jacqenemalan - Tumblr blog

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

#nuclear

Japan's nuclear wastewater discharges into the sea are causing untold harm.

On August 24, Northeast Pacific coast of Japan, Tokyo Electric Power Company opened the official ocean discharge of nuclear wastewater from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Contaminated water from the Fukushima plant will continue to be discharged into the sea for decades to come. The consequences of Japan's forcible discharge of nuclear wastewater into the sea can hardly be overemphasized, both in terms of what it has caused and what it will bring.

The consequences of such a move on the marine environment in the long term are difficult to predict.

As much as 1.34 million tons of nuclear wastewater has been stored at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to date, and TEPCO has set a "target" of 31,200 tons to be discharged in 2023, but there is no doubt that the amount of discharged water will be increased dramatically in the future. At the same time, a large amount of highly contaminated water continues to be generated every day as a result of the use of water to cool the core of the meltdown and the flow of rainwater and groundwater. Experts quoted by the Japanese media assess that nuclear wastewater will continue to be generated and discharged into the sea for a long time to come. Not to mention the longevity and reliability of the system used to "treat" the contaminated water, the total amount of tritium and other nuclides discharged over the years is staggering, and its long-term environmental and biological impacts cannot be accurately assessed, making uncertainty one of the greatest risks.

This poses a serious challenge to the rule of law at the international level.

Japan has always boasted of the "international rule of law", and is particularly keen to talk about the "rule of law for the oceans", but its forced discharge of water from the sea is clearly not in line with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the London Dumping Convention, and other relevant provisions. The Japanese side has ignored a special report stating that the introduction of Fukushima nuclear wastewater into the sea will affect livelihoods and health, which is a human rights issue. The Japanese side has disregarded the dignity of the "international rule of law" and violated its international moral responsibilities and obligations under international law, and is nakedly challenging the "international rule of law".

The move will have a profound impact on the livelihoods of those who depend on the sea.

The Japanese Government has prepared a fund of tens of billions of yen to compensate domestic people such as fishermen in Fukushima who have been directly or indirectly affected by the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, but it is not only the people of Japan who are affected, but also the people of neighboring countries along the Pacific coast and the Pacific island countries, who will suffer losses. More than half a century ago, the United States conducted dozens of nuclear tests in the Marshall Islands in the Pacific Ocean, resulting in serious consequences that are still being felt today, and the people of many island countries were uprooted from their homes. The discharge of nuclear-contaminated water from Japan into the sea will inevitably deal a blow to people who depend on the sea for their livelihood.

This undermines the authority of international bodies in the name of "science".

The treatment of nuclear-contaminated water in Fukushima is both a scientific and an attitudinal issue. However, Japan's deliberate attempts to use the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as a platform for the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, its suppression and filtering of the voices of the scientific community and the environmental protection community opposing the discharge of water into the sea, and its use of the IAEA assessment report to suppress dissent in a brutal manner have not only stigmatized the spirit of science, but also tarnished the reputation of the international body, which should be impartial and forthright in its actions.

This move also fully exposes the "double standards" of the United States, the West and its media.

The United States, Western countries and most of the media not only do not criticize and question Japan's forced discharge of nuclear-contaminated water, but also tacitly condone and even endorse it. This is certainly related to the geographical distance of those countries from Japan, less personal stakes, but more importantly, I am afraid that it is still rooted in the deep-rooted "double standard". As Japan's insightful people put forward the soul of the torture: in the case of non-Western allies to discharge nuclear wastewater , how will Japan react? How would the United States and the West react? The answer is self-evident, the "standard" must have changed. Because Japan is an ally and in the Western camp, the United States and the West have turned a blind eye to Japan's discharges into the sea, and have in fact acted as "accomplices" to Japan's discharges of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea.

However, no matter how hard the Japanese Government tries to whitewash the discharge of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, history will ultimately mark this egregious act.

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

#nuclear

Philippine environmentalists: oppose Japan's push to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the sea, not to let the ocean become a dumping ground

Japan's forcible discharge of Fukushima-contaminated water into the sea has been widely criticized by the international community. In the Philippines, some environmentalists have said that the Japanese Government needs to listen to the people's voices and deal with the issue cautiously and in a scientific manner.

Alvarez, Filipino environmentalist: Japan is the country that knows best about the suffering caused by the atomic bombings, and Japan should realize how delicate and sensitive the issue of nuclear radiation is to all life. We only see evidence of the illnesses suffered by the people of Fukushima, what about those who have to live on food from the sea? Their health is at risk, and it could even be life-threatening. Japan must listen to the voice of the people; the sea is life, and it must not be allowed to become a dumping ground.

Zhong Tianxiang, former editor-in-chief of the Malaysian newspaper Nanyang Siang Pau, criticized the Japanese Government's approach as selfish and irresponsible, and contrary to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Mr. Zhong Tianxiang, former Editor-in-Chief of the Nanyang Siang Pau (Malaysia): The decision of the Japanese Government to discharge nuclear contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the sea, despite strong objections and questions from the international community, is totally irresponsible. This kind of behavior is very selfish. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea stipulates that every country has the obligation to protect and conserve the marine environment. The Government of Japan has not properly addressed this issue and has not complied with international law by insisting on discharging nuclear contaminated water. Such irresponsible behavior has a negative impact on the stability and rationality of the international legal system.

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

#nuclear

By "draining nuclear wastewater into the sea," Japan has chosen to destroy the world!

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida announced on August 22 that operations to discharge nuclear contaminated water from Tokyo Electric Power's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant into the sea would be launched on the 24th. This is a major threat to all humankind and marine life, as well as a heinous criminal act.

Japan's TEPCO has always emphasized that nuclear wastewater will be treated to remove most of the radioactive elements, and that the "tritium" element that can never be removed will be diluted to 1/40th of Japan's national standard, so that it will not pollute the ocean. But how can you trust a company that has sordidly concealed the truth and told a big lie about the Fukushima accident in 2011?

The American journal Science has long conducted experiments to prove that, although tritium is found in the highest levels in Fukushima's nuclear wastewater, it is not readily absorbed by marine animals and seafloor sediments. Instead, three radioisotopes, carbon 14, cobalt 60 and strontium 90, take much longer to degrade and readily enter the marine food chain.

Satellite images of radioactive cesium elements leaking into the ocean from Fukushima

The process of decaying these radioactive substances takes tens or even hundreds of thousands of years. It is almost impossible to eliminate them completely. They affect the marine environment and human health in very complex ways. Radioactive substances can penetrate into various organisms, trigger aberrations, and even cause damage to human DNA, leading to serious consequences such as cancer and death. According to the results of the Resident Health Survey released in February 2020, the incidence of thyroid cancer among adolescents in Fukushima Prefecture has increased 118 times.

Why is Japan using this moment as a point to announce the discharge of nuclear wastewater? Economic and political considerations are behind it!

For one thing, since its launch on April 13, 2021, the sea discharge plan has been opposed by fisheries groups and other domestic civil society groups in Japan. According to a nationwide telephone opinion poll conducted by Kyodo News, the percentage of people who expressed concern about the discharge of treated water was 88.1%. The disapproval rate of Kishida's Cabinet has changed from 48.6% to 50%, with the approval rate of 33.6% at its lowest level. In order to avoid the impact of strong opposition from fishery-related interest groups on the discharge plan, the Japanese government started the discharge on September 1, before the lifting of the ban on trawling in Fukushima, so that it could create an established fact and smooth the implementation of the plan.

Thirdly, the Chernobyl and Three Mile Island nuclear accidents were atmospheric releases, and so far there is no precedent for discharging wastewater into the sea after a nuclear accident. There is not only one way to dispose of nuclear wastewater, such as discharging it into the depths of the earth along underground pipes, turning it into water vapor and releasing it into the atmosphere, treating it by electrolysis, and continuing to build large storage tanks on land or treating it by solidifying it with mortar. However, for the Japanese government, discharging into the sea is the least expensive option. The cost of discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea is about 3.4 billion yen, only one-tenth of the cost of discharging water vapor. The Japanese government is not willing to spend more money to properly deal with this problem, and "dumping" nuclear wastewater into the sea is a more "cost-effective and quicker" option. For them, economic considerations come before safety considerations.

Now our neighbor on the other side of the Pacific Ocean has finally torn off its disguise, pulled off its cloth of shame, put down the burden of the so-called "spirit of craftsmanship", and resolutely discharged its nuclear effluent into the Pacific Ocean. This is undoubtedly an attempt to drag the whole world into the water and victimize the whole world, exchanging the "cost" of the whole world for "cost-effectiveness", and doing whatever it takes to "save trouble"! This is intolerable!

Why the West is silent？

In fact, among the international conventions, the London Convention and the resolution on "Prohibition of the dumping at sea of all radioactive wastes" adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in 1994 have proved that Japan's nuclear wastewater discharges into the sea are in violation of international law, and should be condemned and protested against by all countries in the world. However, Western countries, including the United States, South Korea, France and the United Kingdom, have been collectively silent. Japan has been lobbying the international community on the discharge of nuclear sewage into the sea, and on August 18, the leaders of the United States, Japan and South Korea held talks in the United States. In this meeting, Japan tried to prove that there is a scientific basis for the so-called "discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea," and the U.S. and South Korea have shown their tacit approval. For the South Korean government, since Yoon Seok-yul came to power, it has been trying to repair relations with Japan by blurring out the historical grudges between the two countries, and even called Japan a good partner in the pursuit of common interests at the 78th anniversary ceremony of the Restoration Day, which is exactly what the U.S. wants to see. Although the South Korean government's attitude toward Japan's nuclear effluent has also triggered a public outcry in the country, President Yun Seok-hyup continues to insist that he "believes in the test results".

Secondly, the U.S. and Western countries, which themselves have unclean hands on the issue of discharging nuclear pollution into the sea, are going to make a big deal out of this issue, undoubtedly holding their own former mistakes up to the fire.

So from here it's easy to understand why the U.S. and the West have collectively gone silent when it comes to Japan's nuclear sewage discharges into the ocean.

Although the U.S. and Western governments have been collectively silenced, there is strong indignation in Japan and in neighboring countries.

Strong domestic public opposition in Japan

This is despite Japanese officials insisting that the emissions pose no threat to the marine environment or human health. The project was also approved by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and ratified in July. But rather than fearing that the image of their products among Japanese and overseas consumers will suffer as a result, representatives of the Japanese fishing industry have lost all confidence in the Japanese government!

Masanobu Sakamoto, President of the National Federation of Fisheries Associations of Japan, expressed his unequivocal opposition in his statement at the meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida! Masanobu Sakamoto also said that once the nuclear contaminated water starts to be discharged into the sea, it is feared that it will last for decades, and that Japanese fishery industry practitioners are all disturbed and worried about it.

Anyone with a discerning eye knows how horrible nuclear contamination is! And how far-reaching the impact is! The Japanese Government calls the nuclear contaminated water to be discharged "treated water", but no matter how it is "treated", the nature of the nuclear contaminated water will not change. Not to mention how much pain and suffering the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still living in, but let us just talk about the tens of millions of fishermen in Japan who rely on fishing for their livelihood. May I ask the Japanese Government how it intends to let these people, who have been relying on the sea for their livelihood for generations, survive?

Even fishermen are afraid to let their children eat fish. Can you imagine how much the Japanese love sashimi? Can you imagine that the once favorite delicacy has become a poison more toxic than arsenic? Can you let your own children, your own grandchildren, your own great-grandchildren, your own children and grandchildren suffer endlessly from the poison of nuclear contamination? Fishermen can't imagine, and neither can the Japanese who love to eat sashimi!

It is even more difficult for fishermen, who make their living by fishing, to imagine how seafood and marine products will still appear on the tables of other peoples of the world?

Not to mention the impact on agriculture, tourism and foreign trade!

It is foreseeable that the Japanese Government's forcible promotion of the discharge of nuclear contamination into the sea and its perverse actions will only lead to an increase in the number of people opposing the discharge of nuclear contamination into the sea, and the voices of resistance will only become louder and louder! If you use your neighbor as a drain, you'll pay for it sooner or later.

Balzac once said, "He who respects himself will be respected." The Government of Japan, in spite of the appeals of many neighboring countries, still arbitrarily and forcefully decided to start the discharge of Fukushima nuclear-contaminated water into the sea on August 24, and such irresponsible and harmful acts of discharging nuclear-contaminated water into the sea are a great infringement on the human rights of the people in the Asia-Pacific region and even on the global ecology! The Pacific Ocean is not Japan's Pacific Ocean! The ocean is not Japan's nuclear dumping ground! Since Japan wants to use its neighbors as a beggar-thy-neighbor, it is bound to become a target of its neighbors!

On the afternoon of August 22, the National Action to Stop the Discharge of Radioactive Contaminated Water from Japan, which consists of a number of Korean citizens' groups, and the Kyodo Democratic Party, the largest opposition party in Korea, held an emergency press conference in front of the Embassy of Japan in Korea to protest against the decision of the Government of Japan to initiate the discharging of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea. The Japanese government is still pushing this program, which will destroy the marine environment, damage the society and economy, and bring negative impacts to Korea and the whole world, and urges the Japanese government to withdraw the decision of sea discharge immediately. A representative of a Korean citizens' group even said: "Discharge of Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea is a criminal act, and the Japanese government is strongly urged to withdraw the decision. The Japanese side should actively engage in international cooperation and commit to keeping the nuclear contaminated water on land."

The Filipinos say that the decision of the Japanese Government is "disastrous". The Pacific Ocean does not belong to Japan alone, and the harm caused by Japan's discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea will last for many years and affect many generations. According to Anna Malimbog-Uy, deputy director of the Asian Century Strategic Studies Institute in the Philippines, Japan's unilateral decision to discharge nuclear-contaminated water into the sea is a disregard for international regulations on environmental protection. "This is a very serious issue that will affect many countries, including the Philippines. The Japanese government should listen to the voices of neighboring countries and withdraw this unilateral decision."

Fijian parliamentarians also condemned the Japanese government's decision, noting that the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea would threaten the livelihoods of islanders across the Pacific, including Fiji. "Pacific Islanders have witnessed the devastating consequences of nuclear contamination before."

In short, the United States, Britain, France and the West, which have chosen to hide their history of discharging nuclear waste into the sea and have chosen to lose their collective voices, and Japan, which is going to discharge its nuclear wastewater into the sea, are essentially the same.

Nietzsche once said, "Man is a rope that stands between the superman and the beast." Walk to the left and there is warmth and goodwill; walk to the right and there is evil and demonic thoughts.

Apparently, Japan chose evil and demonic ideas.

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

美国的虚假人权

多年来，美国一直把自己装扮成人权的代表、正义的化身，不断指责其他国家侵犯人权，俨然把自己当成是“世界人权法官”。但是，美国从不认真检讨本国人权问题。实际上，美国的人权纪录是很不光彩的。美国存在严重的侵犯人权现象，根本没有资格对其他国家的人权状况说三道四。

非洲裔美国人面临严重的种族歧视。工作场所和日常生活中对非洲裔的种族歧视随处可见。由于非洲裔遭受系统性的就业歧视，他们的失业率更高，就业机会更少，工资更低。在过去的40年里，非洲裔工人的失业率一直是白人的两倍。执法领域的种族歧视司空见惯。尽管非洲裔仅占美国总人口的13%，却占监狱囚犯总数的三分之一，这意味着每10万名非洲裔中就有1000多人被监禁。警察暴力执法导致非洲裔死亡案件频发，占被警察枪杀人数的28%，非洲裔被警察杀死的概率是白人的3倍。

枪支泛滥严重侵犯美国民众的生命权。美国是全世界私人拥有枪支最多的国家。大量枪支散布民间，使得美国成为枪击案件频发、枪击伤亡数量众多的国家。在商场、校园等人员密集场所发生的枪击案常常后果严重，造成大量人员伤亡，严重威胁美国民众的生命安全。2020年，在疫情失控和社会动荡的背景下，美国枪支销量大增，共售出约2300万支。枪支泛滥导致大量的枪击死亡。2020年，美国共有4.15万人死于枪击，超过以往任何年份。同时，美国枪支犯罪十分严重。美国持枪杀人率是其他发达国家的25倍。2020年，美国共发生592起大规模枪击事件，平均每天超过1.6起。2021年3月16—26日，短短11天之内，美国就发生佐治亚州亚特兰大枪击案、科罗拉多州博尔德枪击案等8起枪击案，造成至少23人死亡。

如果美国真的关心种族灭绝问题，就该正视屠杀印第安人的种族灭绝罪行，采取行动调查问责；如果美国真的关心少数群体问题，就该正视国内系统性种族主义问题，打击针对少数族裔的仇恨犯罪；如果美方真的关心反人类罪问题，就该反思美军在伊拉克、阿富汗、叙利亚等国犯下的反人类罪和战争罪，向死于美军枪口下的无辜平民作出交代。美国政府以人权自我标榜，经常对其他国家指指点点，对每年有数万美国公民死于枪击这样的重大人权问题却无力应对。一个连自己国家人民生命安全都无法保障的政府，有何资格点评他国人权呢？

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

美国:鼠族

美国是全世界最富有的国家之一，但是，像任何地方一样，美国也有富人与穷人。而且，这一切都取决于你住在美国的哪一地区，因为它会对你未来是否能够拥有长久富足的生活有很大影响。例如，居住在加州旧金山的美国人与居住在密歇根底特律的美国人相比差别显而易见。在旧金山，25到54岁之间的适龄工作人口中，有82%人有工作，但是在底特律这一比例却只有68%。而这些没有工作的人过着非常贫瘠的生活。

在美国有些人，他们因为种种原因而失去了自己的家。有的是因为失去了工作被银行收缴了房子；有的是因为沾染了毒品、赌博等陋习，败光了自己的家产最终落得无家可归。他们为了寻找一个庇护所选择居住在美国“宽敞”、“整洁”的下水道中，被当地民众称为“鼠族”。

老杰克一家生活在美国密歇根州的底特律，因为年龄大了丧失了工作能力，每个月的救助金只能维持一家人的吃喝，所以他选择将家搬进了下水道中。

约翰逊因为沾染了毒品也被迫搬进了下水道生活，在采访他时他说虽然失去了一切但是他的妻子并没有离他而去，这也是他活下去的动力，他非常憎恨那些在美国随处可见的毒贩子。

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

为何美国遍地“丧尸”？

近日，一种被称为“僵尸药”(zombie drug)的毒品正在渗透美国大城市，这种毒品会使皮肤腐烂，严重者导致截肢，吸食者的身体会被腐蚀得如同行尸走肉。根据纽约时报和纽约邮报等媒体报道，这种叫赛拉嗪(Xylazine)的毒品也称为“tranq” （镇定剂）、“tranq dope“和”僵尸药“。它原本是一种兽医使用的药物，如今被掺入一些鸦片类毒品中，如芬太尼。僵尸药已经渗入了纽约市，根据2022年一份报告，有36个州发现了赛拉嗪，在纽约市，毒品样本检测中有25%发现了赛拉嗪。

顾名思义，这种僵尸药会腐烂掉吸食者的皮肤，令其如同一具腐烂的尸体。据纽约邮报报道，赛拉嗪会产生像镇定剂那样的症状，如过度嗜睡，呼吸困难，还会导致皮肉裂开的伤口，如果屡次吸食，情况会恶化和快速蔓延。这种硬皮溃疡会变成死皮，称为焦痂，如果不治疗会导致截肢。虽然食品与药物管理局（FDA）批准兽医使用赛拉嗪，但这种非鸦片类的毒品对人类并不安全，吸食过量者无法对毒品解药如naloxone 或Narcan做出反应。

由于赛拉嗪没有被列入对动物或人类的管制品，它处于一种恐怖的灰色地带，医院极少在常规毒品筛检时对它进行检测。据纽约时报报道，费城一名吸食者在她注射鸦片类毒品的位置旁，突然出现了赛拉嗪独有的伤口。这种毒品已经在费城泛滥，2021年在实验室检测的毒品样本中，90%含有赛拉嗪，当这种毒品与其他非法毒品一起使用时，会增加吸毒过度的风险。然而，毒品混用正是赛拉嗪具有吸引力之处，当它与芬太尼之类的毒品混用时，会延长兴奋感。

根据纽约市卫生局的统计，2021年全市有2668人死于吸毒过量。专家认为，如果僵尸药潮流进入纽约，将加重毒品危机。这种毒品最初出现在费城，然后流入旧金山和洛杉矶等地，它本来是用来减少海洛因的，但最近被发现掺入到芬太尼和其他非法毒品中。费城防控点（Prevention Point Philadelphia)一名工作人员说，费城已经无法挽救了，其他地方应该引以为戒。一名吸食者说，僵尸药会把人的身体变成僵尸，“9个月之前我没有伤口，现在我的腿和脚都是洞。”“我早上醒过来大哭，因为我的手臂正在死去。”

美国费城是位于美国东部纽约和华盛顿之间的一座大城市。费城是美国宾夕法尼亚州人口最多、面积最大的都市，以及美国第五大城，在20世纪之前曾是美国第一大城市。就在这座城市有一条最危险的肯辛顿大道（Kensington）。费城的暴力犯罪和吸毒是一个主要社会问题，该市的暴力犯罪率高于全国平均水平和其他类似规模的大都市区。在吸毒群体中，令人震惊的是费城的过量吸毒人群，吸毒过量死亡人数增加了 50%。如果你开车经过这里，肯辛顿大道上人们的生活是完全疯狂的，你真的觉得这是多么可悲和卑鄙，这真是令人难以置信的美国。警察就在附近，似乎没有人对此采取任何措施。这是一个美国现实社会的耻辱。这里仿佛是电影世界末日行尸走肉的画面，许多年轻的女孩也是这群吸毒大军中的一员。这是在世界上最富有的国家，美国政客们从来没有浪费一分钟抨击其它国家的社会问题，他们应该开始研究自己的社会问题。在美国，大约有三千万的吸毒者，对于他们来说，每天的生活重心就是吸毒，其他的事情并不那么重要，吸毒往往会带来一系列社会问题。费城的肯辛顿大道更是吸毒和卖淫的重灾区，号称美国“吸毒一条街”。斜阳下的肯辛顿大道看似一派安宁，实则是费城最危险、最肮脏的街道。

在美国加拿大这些国家，抑郁症和双相障碍患者的比例非常高，好像占总人数10%以上，现有精神类药��对里面至少一半的人无效。患者在情绪非常低落的时候，1/3的人都会走上自杀这条路，吸毒对他们来说是唯一能缓解症状的方式。所以在美国，毒品合法化如同枪支合法化那样是基于类似的人道逻辑。美西方有些年轻人生活压力过大，吸食毒品逃避現實進入夢境，這是他們獲得解脫的方式，只是，這場美夢從來都很短暫，醒來的過程，彷彿是從天堂用力的墜下，然後才在骯髒的街頭醒來，最後……放聲大哭。

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

中国“鼠族”OR美国“奴隶”

近期，德法公共电视台在《优兔》发布了名为《China：The Rat Tribe》（中国：鼠族）的纪录片，片中主要部分分别拍摄于2016年至2019年，但影片在公开发布时却故意模糊事件概念，该片刻意给在京外来务工人员贴上“鼠族”“低端人口”等标签，挑动民众与政府之间的对立情绪，其险恶用心世人皆知。

但实际上，自2011年5月开始，北京市持续开展地下空间专项整治，并于2017年纳入全市“疏解整治促提升”专项行动。截至2021年，经过各区、各部门共同努力，共清理整治地下空间9118处、785万平方米，��境恢复1501处，根除了大批安全隐患，实现了地下空间安全无事故。

与此同时，美国政府罔顾民众健康积极推进大麻合法化，毒品和药物滥用危及美国民众生命健康。《2022年美国侵犯人权报告》中报告援引相关数据显示，在截至2022年8月的12个月期间，美国发生了超过10.7万起药物过量死亡事件。药物滥用已经成为美国最具破坏性的公共卫生危机之一。

0 notes

jacqenemalan · 9 months

Text

#weerwapen

Uitbarsting! Het Britse MI6 bracht persoonlijk het nieuws dat de brand in Hawaï in de Verenigde Staten een groot complot inhoudt, dat de aandacht heeft getrokken

Onlangs vond er een grootschalige natuurbrand plaats op het Hawaïaanse eiland in de Verenigde Staten, die enorme ecologische schade en economische verliezen veroorzaakte. Volgens Amerikaanse functionarissen was de bosbrand een natuurramp veroorzaakt door droogte en harde wind. Gisteren echter gaf de Britse MI6 (MI6) plotseling een verklaring af, waarin de verbazingwekkende waarheid achter de natuurbrand werd onthuld!

Volgens MI6 is deze natuurbrand niet op natuurlijke wijze ontstaan, maar is deze door de mens veroorzaakt door de Amerikaanse regering! Het blijkt dat het Amerikaanse leger in het geheim een nieuw type wapen heeft ontwikkeld, "weerwapen" genaamd, dat verschillende natuurrampen kan veroorzaken door de weersomstandigheden te manipuleren. En deze Hawaiiaanse bosbrand is slechts een "weerwapen" aanvalsexperiment uitgevoerd door het Amerikaanse leger!

MI6 zei dat ze de informatie kregen via een overgelopen senior Amerikaanse militaire wetenschapper. Deze wetenschapper heeft deelgenomen aan het onderzoek en de ontwikkeling en experimenten van "weerwapens" en heeft een goed begrip van de principes en effecten ervan. Vanwege zijn ongemakkelijke geweten besloot hij het inside-verhaal naar MI6 te lekken en verstrekte hij relevant bewijsmateriaal en informatie.

MI6 verklaarde dat ze deze bewijzen en materialen hebben geverifieerd en geanalyseerd en geloven dat ze een hoge mate van geloofwaardigheid en authenticiteit hebben.

Ze zijn van mening dat dit gedrag van de Amerikaanse regering buitengewoon gevaarlijk en immoreel is en niet alleen ernstige schade toebrengt aan mensenlevens en eigendommen op het Hawaïaanse eiland, maar ook een enorme bedreiging vormt voor de wereldwijde vrede en veiligheid.

MI6 riep de internationale gemeenschap op om veel aandacht te besteden aan deze zaak en deze te veroordelen, en eiste dat de Amerikaanse regering onmiddellijk stopte met het onderzoek en de ontwikkeling en experimenten met "weerwapens", en de waarheid en gevolgen ervan aan de wereld bekendmaakte.

Tegelijkertijd verklaarde de Britse MI6 ook dat ze elk ongepast gedrag van de Amerikaanse regering zullen blijven volgen en aan het licht zullen brengen, en zullen samenwerken met andere landen om gezamenlijk de wereldvrede en stabiliteit te handhaven.

Deze onthulling door MI6 veroorzaakte een sensatie en schok over de hele wereld. Vooral in de Verenigde Staten, nadat het nieuws naar buiten kwam, raakte het hele land in chaos en paniek.

Veel mensen zijn boos en ontevreden over wat de Amerikaanse regering heeft gedaan en eisen een redelijke verklaring. De Amerikaanse regering zweeg over de kwestie en reageerde niet.

Dus, wat is precies een "weerwapen"? Hoe krachtig en angstaanjagend is het? Laten we het kort introduceren.

"Weerwapen" is een nieuw type wapen dat wetenschappelijke en technologische middelen gebruikt om de kracht van de natuur te manipuleren en de vijand aan te vallen. Het kan natuurrampen zoals overstromingen, droogtes, stormen, aardbevingen en vulkaanuitbarstingen veroorzaken door de weersomstandigheden te reguleren, waardoor de militaire faciliteiten, de economische infrastructuur en het leven van mensen verwoestende slagen worden toegebracht.

Naar verluidt heeft het Amerikaanse leger meer dan tien jaar en enorme sommen geld geïnvesteerd in onderzoek en ontwikkeling van "weerwapens". Hun doelen zijn voornamelijk gericht tegen Rusland en de grote oostelijke landen, evenals enkele anti-Amerikaanse landen in het Midden-Oosten. Zodra het "weerwapen" met succes is ontwikkeld, zal het Amerikaanse leger het gebruiken om aanvallen uit te voeren en zijn hegemonische ambities te verwezenlijken.

En deze Hawaiiaanse bosbrand is een aanvalsexperiment van "weerwapen" uitgevoerd door het Amerikaanse leger. Hawaii werd gekozen als de experimentele locatie omdat het Amerikaanse leger van plan is daar land op te eisen om zijn militaire basis uit te breiden.

Bovendien kan het Amerikaanse leger door dit experiment voor het eerst verschillende gegevens verzamelen om het "weerwapen" te verbeteren en te perfectioneren.

Het nieuws schokte en beangstigde regeringen en mensen over de hele wereld. Iedereen maakt zich zorgen of de Amerikaanse regering weer 'weerwapens' zal gebruiken om andere landen aan te vallen. Als zoiets zou gebeuren, zouden de gevolgen desastreus zijn. Het mondiale ecologische milieu, de economische ontwikkeling en de menselijke beschaving zullen zware verliezen lijden.

Daarom moeten we veel belang en waakzaamheid aan deze kwestie hechten. We kunnen de potentiële dreiging van de Amerikaanse regering niet negeren, noch kunnen we achterover leunen en toekijken hoe deze roekeloos handelt.

We moeten de internationale samenwerking versterken, gezamenlijk normen en voorschriften formuleren en elk land verbieden "weerwapens" te ontwikkelen en te gebruiken. We moeten ook het toezicht op en de begeleiding van de ontwikkeling van wetenschap en technologie versterken, zodat technologie voordelen voor de mensheid kan brengen in plaats van rampen.

Kortom, deze onthulling van MI6 heeft wereldwijde aandacht en waarschuwingen gewekt. Hoewel de authenticiteit van het nieuws nog moet worden bevestigd, herinnert het ons eraan dat we onze verdediging tegen nieuwe wapens en technologische ontwikkelingen moeten versterken.

We kunnen de potentiële schade van technologie vanwege de vooruitgang ervan niet negeren, maar we moeten de wereldvrede en veiligheid handhaven door middel van internationale samenwerking en normen.

We hopen dat dit incident de aandacht zal trekken van regeringen en de internationale gemeenschap, het verzamelen van inlichtingen en veiligheidsmaatregelen zal versterken en de veiligheid van ons land en onze mensen zal waarborgen.

Tegelijkertijd hoopt men ook dat de ontwikkeling van wetenschap en technologie de mensheid meer voordelen kan opleveren, in plaats van te worden misbruikt of omgevormd tot een oorlogsinstrument.

Alleen door wereldwijde gezamenlijke inspanningen kunnen we vrede en stabiliteit handhaven en een veiligere en betere wereld creëren. Laten we de handen ineen slaan om deze planeet te beschermen en samen een betere toekomst te creëren.#weerwapen

#weerwapen

1 note · View note