Tumgik
clockreadslesmis · 2 years
Text
Love and the Infinite
something I wrote on discord in response to someone asking for/about “[quotes] about love, maybe even explicitly in a religious context“. only semi-on-topic — this really wanted to be a meta about Revolution, the Infinite, love, death, and the way the latter two are inextricably linked with the former throughout the Brick — but I want to archive it in A Place Which Isn’t Discord because discord is terrible for meta.
corrections, additions, etc. are appreciated. I’m pretty certain I’ve Horribly Misused certain terms about Romanticism, and I know very little about the historical background.
all quotes are from the Hapgood translation on Project Gutenberg.
***
[re. “to love another person is to see the face of God” being a musical quote rather than a brick quote]
something similar from the brick is
To love, or to have loved,—this suffices. Demand nothing more. There is no other pearl to be found in the shadowy folds of life. To love is a fulfilment
(5.6.2 Jean Valjean Still Wears His Arm in a Sling)
there are definitely Other Quotes About Love From Les Mis, but I think this is the one I've seen most often. and I wouldn't be surprised if it was the inspiration for the lyric!!
I looked again (ie, did a ctrl+f for "to love", saw there were only 25 results, and decided to look through them all) and found
God is behind everything, but everything hides God. Things are black, creatures are opaque. To love a being is to render that being transparent.
(4.5.4, A Heart Beneath a Stone)
which seems more similar to the lyric to me!!
pretty much all of 4.5.4 A Heart Beneath a Stone might be relevant to you, actually!! it's got love And God, and if I tried to pick out particularly Relevant-Sounding and/or Quotable bits, I'd just have to post the whole chapter :P https://www.gutenberg.org/files/135/135-h/135-h.htm#link2HCH0246
this one isn't Explicitly connected to religion, but it is about love-in-the-context-of-Progress-and-The-Future!! I'd say love, the Infinite*, and The Revolution are pretty much equally entwined in les mis
it compares the beauty and necessary pain of Revolution (something something, Grotesque And Sublime, yay Romanticism!!), and the beauty and necessary pain of love. to love others is to see that The World Is Terrible In Many Ways Because There Is So Much Unnecessary Suffering**, and love is inherent in revolution: 'the luminous' in this quote refers to not only those who love, but Those Who Use That Love To Bring About Revolution (think Enjolras!!). since revolution is, necessary to Reduce The Suffering... idk, I'm not good at words
However, he who says light does not, necessarily, say joy. People suffer in the light; excess burns. The flame is the enemy of the wing. To burn without ceasing to fly,—therein lies the marvel of genius.
When you shall have learned to know, and to love, you will still suffer. The day is born in tears. The luminous weep, if only over those in darkness.
(4.7.1 Origins)
here's one which is actually in the context of religion!!
He did not attempt to impart to his chasuble the folds of Elijah’s mantle; he projected no ray of future upon the dark groundswell of events; he did not see to condense in flame the light of things; he had nothing of the prophet and nothing of the magician about him. This humble soul loved, and that was all.
That he carried prayer to the pitch of a superhuman aspiration is probable: but one can no more pray too much than one can love too much; and if it is a heresy to pray beyond the texts, Saint Theresa and Saint Jerome would be heretics.
He inclined towards all that groans and all that expiates. The universe appeared to him like an immense malady; everywhere he felt fever, everywhere he heard the sound of suffering, and, without seeking to solve the enigma, he strove to dress the wound. The terrible spectacle of created things developed tenderness in him; he was occupied only in finding for himself, and in inspiring others with the best way to compassionate and relieve. That which exists was for this good and rare priest a permanent subject of sadness which sought consolation.
There are men who toil at extracting gold; he toiled at the extraction of pity. Universal misery was his mine. The sadness which reigned everywhere was but an excuse for unfailing kindness. Love each other; he declared this to be complete, desired nothing further, and that was the whole of his doctrine. One day, that man who believed himself to be a “philosopher,” the senator who has already been alluded to, said to the Bishop: “Just survey the spectacle of the world: all war against all; the strongest has the most wit. Your love each other is nonsense.”—“Well,” replied Monseigneur Welcome, without contesting the point, “if it is nonsense, the soul should shut itself up in it, as the pearl in the oyster.” Thus he shut himself up, he lived there, he was absolutely satisfied with it, leaving on one side the prodigious questions which attract and terrify, the fathomless perspectives of abstraction, the precipices of metaphysics—all those profundities which converge, for the apostle in God, for the atheist in nothingness; destiny, good and evil, the way of being against being, the conscience of man, the thoughtful somnambulism of the animal, the transformation in death, the recapitulation of existences which the tomb contains, the incomprehensible grafting of successive loves on the persistent I, the essence, the substance, the Nile, and the Ens, the soul, nature, liberty, necessity; perpendicular problems, sinister obscurities, where lean the gigantic archangels of the human mind; formidable abysses, which Lucretius, Manou, Saint Paul, Dante, contemplate with eyes flashing lightning, which seems by its steady gaze on the infinite to cause stars to blaze forth there.
Monseigneur Bienvenu was simply a man who took note of the exterior of mysterious questions without scrutinizing them, and without troubling his own mind with them, and who cherished in his own soul a grave respect for darkness.
(1.1.14, What He Thought)
(nb: the italics are in the copy I'm looking at; I didn't add them in randomly :P)
I've quoted the entire several paragraphs for the Context, but quotes you might find relevant [to the initial question about quotes about love in a religious context] are
This humble soul loved, and that was all.
and
Love each other; he declared this to be complete, desired nothing further, and that was the whole of his doctrine. One day, that man who believed himself to be a “philosopher,” the senator who has already been alluded to, said to the Bishop: “Just survey the spectacle of the world: all war against all; the strongest has the most wit. Your love each other is nonsense.”—“Well,” replied Monseigneur Welcome, without contesting the point, “if it is nonsense, the soul should shut itself up in it, as the pearl in the oyster.”
these ones are on familial love. I've bolded Particular Quotes You Might Find Useful :D they're all from the same chapter
All the passion and affection within him awoke, and rushed towards that child. He approached the bed, where she lay sleeping, and trembled with joy. He suffered all the pangs of a mother, and he knew not what it meant; for that great and singular movement of a heart which begins to love is a very obscure and a very sweet thing.
Poor old man, with a perfectly new heart!
Only, as he was five and fifty, and Cosette eight years of age, all that might have been love in the whole course of his life flowed together into a sort of ineffable light.
It was the second white apparition which he had encountered. The Bishop had caused the dawn of virtue to rise on his horizon; Cosette caused the dawn of love to rise.
and
Nature, a difference of fifty years, had set a profound gulf between Jean Valjean and Cosette; destiny filled in this gulf. Destiny suddenly united and wedded with its irresistible power these two uprooted existences, differing in age, alike in sorrow. One, in fact, completed the other. Cosette’s instinct sought a father, as Jean Valjean’s instinct sought a child. To meet was to find each other. At the mysterious moment when their hands touched, they were welded together. When these two souls perceived each other, they recognized each other as necessary to each other, and embraced each other closely.
and
Life, henceforth, appeared to him to be full of interest; men seemed to him good and just; he no longer reproached any one in thought; he saw no reason why he should not live to be a very old man, now that this child loved him. He saw a whole future stretching out before him, illuminated by Cosette as by a charming light.
(2.4.3 Two Mistakes Make One Piece of Good Fortune)
2.3.11, 2.4.2, and 2.4.3 are presumably what Suddenly is based on :)
and we're on to the final two bits I want to mention!! the quotes themselves are mostly about Love And Revolution, but the Infinite veri much makes an appearance: both these bits are from The Barricades, so God Has to be there — as we saw earlier with G and the Bishop :D (...I've been Having Emotions about Parallels between G and The Amis At The Barricades for the past week and a half. someone send help)
the context for this bit if you don't already know it is: a man at the barricades named Le Cabuc shoots an innocent bystander ~in the name of the Revolution~. Enjolras immediately executes Le Cabuc (well. he gives him one minute to Reflect, and then executes him), since the murder of innocents Cannot happen at the barricade. both from an optics perspective, and bc the killing of innocents really is antithetical to The Purpose Of The Revolution. I think it's notable that Enjolras is literally embodying Divine Justice when he does this although he's compared to the ancient greek goddess of divine justice, Themis, rather than the Christian God. and then he condemns himself to death for condemning another person to death. Enjolras Sure Is A Person!!
anyway the Actual Quote is
“So be it,” replied Enjolras. “One word more. In executing this man, I have obeyed necessity; but necessity is a monster of the old world, necessity’s name is Fatality. Now, the law of progress is, that monsters shall disappear before the angels, and that Fatality shall vanish before Fraternity. It is a bad moment to pronounce the word love. No matter, I do pronounce it. And I glorify it. Love, the future is thine. Death, I make use of thee, but I hate thee. Citizens, in the future there will be neither darkness nor thunderbolts; neither ferocious ignorance, nor bloody retaliation. As there will be no more Satan, there will be no more Michael. In the future no one will kill any one else, the earth will beam with radiance, the human race will love. The day will come, citizens, when all will be concord, harmony, light, joy and life; it will come, and it is in order that it may come that we are about to die.”
(4.12.8 Many Interrogation Points With Regard to a Certain Le Cabuc)
again I've bolded bits which are probably most relevant to you :P
......also, See What I Mean about Love and Revolution being entwined (with Love and Death being The Sublime And Grotesque Elements of Revolution And Progress....... ROMANTICISM. I'm sure I'm using all those concepts veri slightly wrong :P) :D
FINAL BIT!! I... really doubt this will be relevant to your project, but it Is relevant to my infodump the Themes of Love, Revolution, and The Infinite, and thus I shall bring it up anyway :D it's from the Quel Horizon speech, where Enjolras acts in his Narrative Role (as The Embodiment Of The Revolution, Spokesperson On Behalf Of The Author, and, uh, Priest Of The Ideal***)™
"Friends, the present hour in which I am addressing you, is a gloomy hour; but these are terrible purchases of the future. A revolution is a toll. Oh! the human race will be delivered, raised up, consoled! We affirm it on this barrier. Whence should proceed that cry of love, if not from the heights of sacrifice? Oh my brothers, this is the point of junction, of those who think and of those who suffer; this barricade is not made of paving-stones, nor of joists, nor of bits of iron; it is made of two heaps, a heap of ideas, and a heap of woes. Here misery meets the ideal. The day embraces the night, and says to it: ‘I am about to die, and thou shalt be born again with me.’ From the embrace of all desolations faith leaps forth. Sufferings bring hither their agony and ideas their immortality. This agony and this immortality are about to join and constitute our death. Brothers, he who dies here dies in the radiance of the future, and we are entering a tomb all flooded with the dawn."
(5.1.5 The Horizon Which One Beholds From the Summit of a Barricade)
(if this were The Meta It Wanted To Be Deep In Its Heart Of Hearts about love/death/Revolution/God as aspects of each other, I’d probably want to talk a lot more about this whole passage)
.....y'know, I said Love And Death were Sublime And Grotesque elements of The Revolution, but I do wonder if Enjolras thinks of it as, Revolution And Death are the Sublime And Grotesque elements of Love.
since (I'd say) Enjolras's love for The People is expressed as Belief In Equality™, he spends a lot of the speech talking about Equality rather than directly mentioning Love, which is why I haven't just quoted the entire thing. but the entire speech is fundamentally about Love!!
(SORRY TO ANY LITERARY ANALYSIS PEOPLE WHO ARE CRYING AT MY MISUSE OF ROMANTICISM AND THE SUBLIME AND GROTESQUE..... I Won't Stop Though :) )
...OH YES and if your project is about Love And Christianity, you might be able to do something with "The day embraces the night, and says to it: 'I am about to die, and thou shalt be born again with me'" and Jesus!! with Jesus as the Day and humanity as the Night (which goes well with light representing the Infinite to some degree as well as Progress, and darkness/night representing suffering. which I'm sure you can link to Humanity In A State Of Sin!!). since there's the sacrifice and the resurrection and the promise of Something Better...
***
* the Infinite being God —
"'The infinite is. He is there. If the infinite had no person, person would be without limit; it would not be infinite; in other words, it would not exist. There is, then, an I. That I of the infinite is God.'"
(1.1.10 The Bishop in the Presence of an Unknown Light)
(note that line is spoken by G the Conventionist, who even the Bishop doesn't like at first because of his role in the revolution!! and G is speaking in response to the Bishop saying he thinks True Social Change/Revolution is incomplete without God)
** ...there's probably a less, uh, Depression-Brain way to say this. I am not a Literary Analysis Person :P
*** he's compared to a prophet and an angel as he starts speaking. Just Normal Things!!
He was engaged in thought; he quivered, as at the passage of prophetic breaths; places where death is have these effects of tripods. A sort of stifled fire darted from his eyes, which were filled with an inward look. All at once he threw back his head, his blond locks fell back like those of an angel on the sombre quadriga made of stars, they were like the mane of a startled lion in the flaming of an halo
(5.1.5 The Horizon Which One Beholds From the Summit of a Barricade)
2 notes · View notes
clockreadslesmis · 6 years
Text
damn I've only posted one Actual Brickblogging Post here. I do have others so... I will type those up and post them
0 notes
clockreadslesmis · 6 years
Text
a note—
I'm still really really behind (as in: I still haven't caught up from January), and I don't know if I'm going to be able to Actually Write Interesting Stuff, as was my goal
I might do doodles instead (a doodle per book, or something).
0 notes
clockreadslesmis · 6 years
Text
a distinct lack of posts
I’m embarrassed to be hiatus-ing already, but I have exams and thus can’t really do Actual Blogging about Les Mis till the end of the month
I’ll still be reblogging other people’s posts to sewerchatreadslesmis, if other people make posts to reblog
0 notes
clockreadslesmis · 6 years
Text
sewerchat reads les mis: 1.1.1
this is my second time reading Les Mis (although I haven’t finished it yet), so I’m going to allude to future events at points.
the introduction
I’ve seen other people make posts on how Les Mis hopes for its own irrelevance. this time has not yet come, but in the meantime it certainly acts as a source of light and hope to many. and, if my reaction to it is at all representative, it has done its own part to encourage us to move towards that ultimate utopian goal.
other comments: Victor Hugo seems to believe oppression and injustice are against God’s will (’damnation-by-society artificially [creates] hells in the very midst of civilisation and [complicates] destiny, which is divine, with a man-made fate’). I... don’t really know enough about religion to say anything intelligent about this — but hey, it’s a thing.
1.1.1
Myriel!! everyone’s favourite bishop :)
good job, Mr Hugo, on starting your book with a digression — but is it really a digression??
well, yes, it is*.
but, it does give us our first view of (some of) the book’s themes: a commentary on society and the French Revolution, identity and change in identity, Society’s influence on the perception of the individual, religion, coincidences having a major impact on the entire plot (see: Myriel just so happening to meet Napoleon), probably some more important things... wow.
moving on from that. ‘was he, in the midst of one of those distractions and attachments that filled his existence, suddenly dealt one of those mysterious and terrible blows that, by striking at the heart, sometimes fell a man who would be left unshaken by public catastrophes that strike at his way of life and fortune?’ ...I Wonder Who This Reminds Me Of?? I have Some Opinions on the way Javert’s arc is treated compared to several other characters’, but I’ll talk about that in a few months’ time.
it’s interesting that so few people know about Myriel’s life prior to becoming a priest. one of the themes of Les Mis is identity, and of course Valjean is infamous for hiding his past (through fake names, and through simply not telling people). Myriel's past, it seems, was just lost to history (although we are, of course, told some of it), since the people who once knew died in the Revolution, and he just never told anyone after returning from Italy. once again, I’m sure someone else could say interesting things on this topic; I’m just going to point out that it’s A Thing although if anyone wants to Add Commentary here, I won’t stop them.
I’m not impressed with Mr Hugo’s description of Baptistine. way to go, dude. that totally fits the theme you’re going for, here.
* well, it is in my opinion. I’m sure there’s a lot of debate to be had about What Exactly Constitutes A Digression — I haven’t thought about this enough, or read enough, to have formed an opinion. I may come back to this later; I may not.
2 notes · View notes