Last Seen Blogs
eyesofafrikatv
EyesofAfrikaTV is an online platform
ajcrowleyinvented
Anthony Janthony Crowley has invented:
le-scenariste
The found family trope
frogekin
helo i am froge
okbaekii-blog
ok_beakii
Photo
The Turmoil in the Balkans
The Great Powers’ Dilemma
The Great Powers are at odds over what to do with the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire. They can’t agree on removing him because they know Russia and Austria have ambitions to annex the region if the Sultan is ousted. Germany, meanwhile, prefers to stay out of the conflict. Instead of joining in on pressuring the Sultan to reform Macedonian administration, Germany takes a backseat approach. This benefits Germany as the Sultan, grateful for their non-interference, grants them valuable concessions in the Turkish Empire. This has made Germans wealthier and more influential.
Germany’s Strategy
Germany’s strategy involves a long-term vision. Even though Austria and Russia join forces with France, Britain, and Italy in calling for reforms, Germany understands that neither Russia nor Austria truly desires these reforms. The ongoing instability in the Balkan Peninsula offers these two countries a chance to send in their armies under the pretense of securing peace, but with the intention to stay and gain control.
Austria and Russia’s Ambitions
Austria and Russia have their sights set on key territories. Austria wants to extend its reach to Salonika, while Russia aims for Constantinople. Germany supports Austria’s ambitions, hoping that Austria’s move towards Salonika will eventually benefit Germany itself. Germany anticipates that the Austrian Empire is on the decline and that the German Empire will need to expand. By supporting Austria’s southern expansion, Germany foresees a future where Salonika becomes a German port Tours Bulgaria.
The Bigger Picture
Germany’s foresight extends beyond immediate gains. They predict that the Austrian Empire’s weakening will necessitate German expansion. By aiding Austria’s ambitions in the Balkans, Germany is positioning itself to take over strategic locations once Austria inevitably falters. Germany’s goal is clear: they aim to make Salonika a key German port, strengthening their position in the region and expanding their influence.
The Balkan Intrigue
The situation in the Balkans is a tangled web of interests and ambitions. The Great Powers each have their own agendas, making it difficult to reach a consensus on how to deal with the Sultan. Russia and Austria’s hidden motives behind their calls for reform complicate matters further. Their true desire is not peace and stability but rather an opportunity to extend their control over the Balkans. Germany, on the other hand, uses a more subtle approach, securing economic gains and laying the groundwork for future territorial expansion.
The turmoil in the Balkans illustrates the complex interplay of ambitions among the Great Powers. The inability to agree on a unified approach towards the Ottoman Empire’s Sultan reflects deeper geopolitical strategies. Germany’s non-interference and support for Austrian expansion are calculated moves aimed at future dominance. Meanwhile, the region remains in a state of flux, with each power maneuvering to secure its own interests, leaving the fate of the Balkan Peninsula uncertain and its people caught in the crossfire of great power politics.
0 notes
Photo
The Enduring Symbolism of the Rose A Journey Through Time
Rose Imagery Across Cultures
Even in primitive drawings from the Stone Age, images of the rose are found, emphasizing its timeless significance. Interestingly, the Eskimo language lacks a specific word for “rose,” a fact that might elicit a smile.
The Rose in Ancient Texts and Myths
From ancient Babylon, India, Persia, Greece, and Rome to modern-day Europe and Africa, the rose features prominently in scriptures, sacred texts, myths, and symbols. Universally revered as a gift from the gods, it symbolizes unconditional love, fertility, and the celebration of life. In many cultures, the rose represents the Great Mother-Goddess, worshipped by ancient Thracians in the Kazanlak region Private Turkey Tours.
Legends and Lore
Countless legends surround the rose, from tales of the divine rose elixir in the gardens of Babylon to Cleopatra’s use of rose water to seek favor from the gods. Stories of the fabled fountains of the Taj Mahal and the cultivation of roses by Thracians, depicted in murals near Hissar, further enrich the rose’s mystique.
The Rose’s Enduring Presence
The rose continues to captivate us today, embodying fragility yet resilience in its mission to bestow beauty and tranquility through its blossoms and fragrance. Its ability to provide harmony and balance makes it a natural healer, drawing us to its soothing embrace.
Exploring Rose History at the Museum
The Museum of the Rose offers a unique glimpse into Bulgaria’s 350-year-old history of rose cultivation and processing. Divided into three main exhibition halls, the museum showcases an extensive collection of archive photos, tools for rose garden cultivation, vessels for storing and exporting rose attar, ancient distilleries, and the largest rose attar storage vessel in Bulgaria, known as “kunkuma.” The word “kunkuma,” derived from the sound of pouring rose attar, is native to Kazanlak, adding to the region’s rich cultural tapestry.
0 notes
Photo
Sultan Murad IV - Reign and Legacy
Repairing and Enriching Sacred Sites
The Tombs of Imam-i Azam and Sheikh Abdulkadir Geylani, revered figures in Islam, underwent extensive repairs supervised by Sheikhulislam. They were adorned with opulent gold and silver lamps along with jewelry, enhancing their grandeur and significance. Additionally, Mustafa Pasha, the trusted guard of Sultan Murad IV, displayed profound devotion by sending a diamond to adorn the Prophet’s Tomb in Medina (Ravza-i Mutaharra).
International Diplomacy and Remarkable Gifts
Sultan Murad IV’s reign saw prosperity that extended its influence to the farthest reaches of the east. An envoy from India arrived in Musul bearing lavish gifts while the Sultan was en route from Baghdad to Istanbul. Among these gifts was an exquisitely decorated belt valued at fifty thousand piasters and a unique helmet crafted from elephant’s ear and rhinoceros hide, reputed to be impervious to bullets and swords. In a display of his prowess, Sultan Murad IV pierced the helmet effortlessly with his spear, filling it with gold florins before returning it to the Indian Sovereign’s palace.
Restoring Order and Stability
Sultan Murad IV’s rule was marked by his unwavering authority, which he wielded to maintain order within the empire, rescuing it from the brink of collapse. However, the toll of such authoritarianism took a toll on him, leaving him exhausted. Upon his brother Sultan Ibrahim’s ascension to the throne, order had already been established, aided by a treasury brimming with resources.
The Reformative Era Under Sultan Ibrahim
During Sultan Ibrahim’s reign, characterized by historians as a period of folly, Kara Mustafa Pasha, a seasoned vizier, served as Grand Vizier. Under his leadership Istanbul Walking Tour, the treasury remained stable, intoxication was abolished, and administrative reforms were implemented, including city registrations and the first census. He ensured timely payments for Janissaries and Spahis, with salaries fixed at eighty aspers of pure silver. Moreover, he introduced the practice of allocating clothing aid annually from the treasury. Despite his remarkable achievements, Kara Mustafa Pasha met an untimely end through execution in 1053.
Legacy and Conclusion
Sultan Murad IV’s reign left an indelible mark on Ottoman history, marked by prosperity, diplomatic prowess, and authoritative governance. His legacy endured through the reforms initiated under Sultan Ibrahim, underscoring the significance of stable governance and administrative efficiency in sustaining an empire.
0 notes
Photo
The Bulgarian Way of Life
The Bulgarians, much like the Russian peasantry, uphold traditional patriarchal values.
Family Bonds
In Bulgarian households, multiple generations often reside under one roof, with fathers, married sons, and their descendants cohabiting until the grandfather passes away. With each new marriage, an additional room is constructed onto the family home, accommodating the growing family unit. This communal living arrangement fosters a sense of unity, with all members paying homage and deference to the family patriarch.
Population Estimations
Estimating the population of Bulgarian villages requires a nuanced approach. While the number of houses may suggest a certain figure, it’s essential to consider the average household size. According to Edip Effendi’s report, the village in question purportedly had only 1,400 inhabitants—a claim deemed highly dubious by Mr. Schuyler. Through examination of tax records, Schuyler discovered 1,421 able-bodied men subject to military exemption tax. In most European countries, this figure would signify a population of approximately 15,000. However, due to unique circumstances in Bulgaria, the actual population likely ranges between 8,000 to 10,000 individuals Tour Packages Balkan.
Misconceptions and Realities
Dispelling Myths
There exists a prevalent misconception regarding the Bulgarians’ level of civilization. Often dismissed as primitive savages akin to American Indians, this stereotype fails to capture the true essence of Bulgarian society.
Education and Enlightenment
Contrary to popular belief, Bulgarian villages boast thriving educational institutions. Despite challenges posed by Turkish authorities, these schools, supported by voluntary taxation, provide free education to children of all backgrounds. Nearly every Bulgarian child receives instruction in reading and writing, with literacy rates comparable to those of England and France.
Challenging Perceptions
It is imperative to challenge outdated perceptions of Bulgarian society. The widespread dissemination of false narratives undermines the rich cultural heritage and progressive strides made by the Bulgarian people. By acknowledging their educational achievements and societal advancements, we can dispel the myth of Bulgarian “savagery” and recognize the nation’s rightful place among civilized societies.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgaria's Historical Struggles and Expansion
Conflict with Byzantium (679 A.D.)
At this time, Hellenic Byzantium was occupied with battles against the Arabs. In 679, the Byzantine emperor Constantine II waged war against the Old Bulgarians. Unfortunately, Constantine’s army suffered a severe defeat, and he had to sign a peace treaty, acknowledging the Bulgarian khan’s authority and surrendering all the land that makes up present-day Bulgaria.
Fusion of Slavs and Old Bulgarians
The blending of Slavs and Old Bulgarians into a united people called Bulgarians continued. They expanded south into Thrace and Macedonia and west along the Danube basin into Central Europe.
Conflict with Byzantium (811-813 A.D.)
In 811, the Byzantine emperor Nicephorus I City Tour Istanbul, concerned about the growing power of the Bulgarians, led an army into Bulgaria. The expedition ended in disaster, with the emperor killed and his army defeated. In 813, the new Byzantine emperor, Michael, launched a stronger attack on the Bulgarians. The Byzantines suffered a significant defeat, and surviving soldiers found safety only within the walls of Byzantium. King Krum of Bulgaria then besieged Byzantium, but when Krum fell ill and died, the Bulgarians withdrew after securing a promise of an annual tribute from Byzantium.
The Golden Age
Reign of King Boris I (865 A.D.)
King Boris I, a crucial Bulgarian ruler, accepted the Byzantine form of Christianity as the official Bulgarian religion in 865. However, tensions and conflicts with Byzantium persisted. Byzantium aimed to Hellenize and assimilate the Bulgarians into their culture, using peaceful means like making Greek the language of the church and state. However, two brothers, Cyril and Methodius, developed an alphabet for the Old Bulgarian language, known today as “Cyrillic.” King Boris I supported the spread of Cyrillic, allowing the Old Bulgarian language to compete with Greek in church rituals and ecclesiastical literature. Cyrillic later extended beyond Bulgaria, reaching other Slavic countries such as Serbia and Russia.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgaria's Historical Struggles and Expansion
Conflict with Byzantium (679 A.D.)
At this time, Hellenic Byzantium was occupied with battles against the Arabs. In 679, the Byzantine emperor Constantine II waged war against the Old Bulgarians. Unfortunately, Constantine’s army suffered a severe defeat, and he had to sign a peace treaty, acknowledging the Bulgarian khan’s authority and surrendering all the land that makes up present-day Bulgaria.
Fusion of Slavs and Old Bulgarians
The blending of Slavs and Old Bulgarians into a united people called Bulgarians continued. They expanded south into Thrace and Macedonia and west along the Danube basin into Central Europe.
Conflict with Byzantium (811-813 A.D.)
In 811, the Byzantine emperor Nicephorus I City Tour Istanbul, concerned about the growing power of the Bulgarians, led an army into Bulgaria. The expedition ended in disaster, with the emperor killed and his army defeated. In 813, the new Byzantine emperor, Michael, launched a stronger attack on the Bulgarians. The Byzantines suffered a significant defeat, and surviving soldiers found safety only within the walls of Byzantium. King Krum of Bulgaria then besieged Byzantium, but when Krum fell ill and died, the Bulgarians withdrew after securing a promise of an annual tribute from Byzantium.
The Golden Age
Reign of King Boris I (865 A.D.)
King Boris I, a crucial Bulgarian ruler, accepted the Byzantine form of Christianity as the official Bulgarian religion in 865. However, tensions and conflicts with Byzantium persisted. Byzantium aimed to Hellenize and assimilate the Bulgarians into their culture, using peaceful means like making Greek the language of the church and state. However, two brothers, Cyril and Methodius, developed an alphabet for the Old Bulgarian language, known today as “Cyrillic.” King Boris I supported the spread of Cyrillic, allowing the Old Bulgarian language to compete with Greek in church rituals and ecclesiastical literature. Cyrillic later extended beyond Bulgaria, reaching other Slavic countries such as Serbia and Russia.
0 notes
Photo
Bulgaria's Ascension to Independence
A Flourishing Dawn
A Milestone Attained
With the formal recognition of Bulgaria’s independence, the nation achieved an esteemed legal status comparable to its European counterparts. This momentous event marked the commencement of a transformative era for the Bulgarian people.
Navigating Between Orient and Europe
Over three decades, Bulgarians navigated the critical juncture between the Orient and Europe. Eager to break free from the economic inertia of the Ottoman Empire, they swiftly sought to align themselves with the advanced nations of the continent.
The Rise of Bulgarian Industry
In the initial decade of the 20th century, Bulgaria’s fledgling industry witnessed an extraordinary surge, achieving a sevenfold increase in production. The state actively supported local industries through tax concessions and protective custom policies, fostering a burgeoning economic landscape.
Agriculture, Commerce, and Industry Advance
Bulgaria’s rapid economic development during the late 19th and early 20th centuries manifested in notable progress across agricultural, commercial, and industrial domains. By 1910, the nation had outpaced its neighbors in various economic indicators Private Turkey Tours, signaling its emergence as a regional economic powerhouse.
A Nationwide Revival
A cultural and intellectual renaissance swept across Bulgaria, leaving an indelible mark on science, literature, arts, and sports. This pervasive renewal, fueled by the nation’s promising economic and spiritual potential, positioned Bulgaria as a beacon of progress.
Empowered by Promise, Confronting National Challenges
By 1912, fortified by economic prosperity and a renewed national spirit, Bulgarians were prepared to address their national question through military means. This era of affluence and cultural resurgence laid the foundation for Bulgaria’s journey towards increased autonomy and global recognition.
0 notes
Photo
Silent Bargains and Ransom
Haggling for a Ravaged Village’s Redemption
Clandestine Negotiations The Veil over Hafiz Pacha’s Dealings
Amidst the atrocities unfolding in Avrat-Alan, a clandestine drama played out in the shadows. Hafiz Pacha, orchestrating a grim narrative, engaged in secret negotiations with the imprisoned men from the village. What transpired in those hushed conversations revealed a sinister plot—a ransom for the very village he had plundered.
Ransom in the Shadows The Perilous Path to Redemption
As the horrors continued, the terms of Avrat-Alan’s ransom were meticulously hashed out. In the shadows, a delicate dance unfolded, with money becoming the currency of redemption. The villagers, desperate to reclaim their ravaged homes, faced the arduous task of raising the demanded funds. Every coin collected became a silent plea for salvation from the clutches of brutality.
Freedom at a Cost The Liberation of a Broken People
The negotiated sum was finally assembled, a testament to the indomitable spirit of a community shattered by violence. The once-imprisoned men were released, allowed to return to a village forever scarred. The price of freedom, however Balkan Tours, wasn’t just monetary; it bore the weight of silent compromises, an unspoken understanding that survival required a perilous pact with their tormentors.
Behind Closed Doors Unraveling the Intricacies of Ransom
Securing the details of this transaction proved a Herculean task for Mr. Schuyler, navigating a landscape of fear and whispered secrets. The villagers, haunted by the specter of Hafiz Pacha’s vengeance, hesitated to reveal the truth. For the money extorted wasn’t destined for the government’s coffers but served as a tribute to Hafiz Pacha’s private exchequer. In a strange twist of fate, the very government that should condemn such actions might yet demand a reckoning.
The Toll of Tragedy Lives Lost and the Lingering Specter of Fear
The toll exacted on Avrat-Alan was devastating, with estimates suggesting between 200 and 300 lives lost. The casualties were predominantly those who dared to flee, meeting their demise at the merciless hands of the marauding Bashi-Bazouks. The haunting specter of fear, coupled with the unspoken trauma of silent bargains, lingered over a village forever changed by the harrowing events that unfolded in its midst.
0 notes
Photo
Tragedy in Perustitza
Unraveling the Brutality of the Bashi-Bazouks
In the somber chronicles of the village of Perustitza, a tale of tragedy unfolds, shedding light on the merciless actions of the notorious Bashi-Bazouks. The events that transpired during those fateful days not only left a scar on the community but also drew attention to the need for justice and accountability.
One particular incident exemplifies the ruthless nature of the Bashi-Bazouks. Among those who ventured outside the village was a Frenchman, involved in commercial activities in Philippopolis. Driven by the distressing news of unrest, he returned home in search of a fellow Frenchman who had gone missing. Unbeknownst to him, danger lurked as he encountered the Bashi-Bazouks. Fluent in Turkish, he attempted to explain his purpose to Achmet-Aga, only to find himself detained and eventually killed, presumably in a pursuit for imagined wealth.
This tragic occurrence did not go unnoticed by the French Consul, who promptly lodged a complaint. The French Government, spurred by this grievous act, likely demanded compensation for the families of the two deceased men. This incident underscores the gravity of the situation in Perustitza and unveils the murderous tendencies that fueled the actions of the Bashi-Bazouks.
Siege to the village
As the Bashi-Bazouks laid siege to the village, terrorizing its inhabitants, a grim reality unfolded. Those who lacked confidence in the benevolence of the Turks and hesitated to surrender found themselves fleeing to the fields. private tours bulgaria Their desperate escape, however, was futile as the merciless pursuers hunted them down, leaving a trail of death in their wake.
The Bashi-Bazouks, having disposed of those in their clutches, turned their attention to the abandoned homes. Pillaging with abandon, they plundered the villagers of their possessions and, with a heartless disregard, set their homes ablaze. The village, once a peaceful abode, now stood witness to the destruction wrought by the marauding forces.
Remarkably, the Bashi-Bazouks refrained from launching a direct assault on the church, opting instead to harass its occupants from a distance. Their bravery, it seemed, was reserved for confronting defenseless women and children. When faced with armed resistance, their courage waned, revealing a stark contrast in their demeanor.
For three agonizing days, the villagers endured the pillaging and burning of their homes, while the Bashi-Bazouks callously fired upon the church from a secure vantage point. The besieged villagers, relegated to the churchyard, could only watch in despair as the flames consumed the remnants of their once-thriving community.
The tragedy of Perustitza serves as a poignant reminder of the brutality that can be unleashed in times of conflict. It beckons the international community to reflect on the importance of justice and accountability, urging swift action to address the heinous acts perpetrated by the Bashi-Bazouks. In the face of such atrocities, the world must stand united to ensure that the voices of the victims are heard and that the perpetrators are held accountable for their crimes.
0 notes
Photo
MacGahan Arrived Philippopolis
No journalist was ever more suited to such a mission as was MacGahan. He arrived in Philippopolis on fitly 23rd and immediately set about his task. On the other hand, the British government instructed Sir Henry Elliot, ambassador to Constantinople, to head an official inquiry, and Walter Baring, secretary of the Legation, was given the task.
At the suggestion of Dr. George Washburn, director of Robert College, the American plenipotentiary minister Maynard decided in his turn to inquire into the atrocities and entrusted the General-consul Eugene Schuyler, a well-known expert of his time on Russian foreign policy, with this third fact-finding expedition. The result was three parallel investigations led respectively by MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring.
Schuyler and Baring (the latter escorted by Guaracino, an official at the British consular service and self-avowed philo-turk) became the diplomatic satellites of the young journalist, and if Schuyler’s report published on August 28th, was accepted as a competent confirmation of MacGahan’s accounts City Tour Istanbul, the British diplomat refuted the conclusions he had previously been instructed to draw.
Bulgarian soil
MacGahan’s method of investigation is that of direct contact with the reality of the situation. In this relation is shown the intense humanism and combative attitude of the author in the face of all that is humiliating and a defiling of humanity. The principal figure in these reports is the martyred Bulgarian people and the Bulgarian soil, charred and bloodsoaked by the Turkish secular tyrant.
At Panagurishte, on the fortifications stained with blood, in the church at Batak, transformed into a horrible graveyard, before the heaped human skulls, amidst the crowds of widows and orphans, flocking beneath a moaning wafting heavenwards, amidst the witnesses of unseen human exploit of honor in Perustitsa, MacGahan followed in the wake of the insurgents and fulfilled the duty imposed on him by his conscience.
0 notes
Photo
MacGahan Arrived Philippopolis
No journalist was ever more suited to such a mission as was MacGahan. He arrived in Philippopolis on fitly 23rd and immediately set about his task. On the other hand, the British government instructed Sir Henry Elliot, ambassador to Constantinople, to head an official inquiry, and Walter Baring, secretary of the Legation, was given the task.
At the suggestion of Dr. George Washburn, director of Robert College, the American plenipotentiary minister Maynard decided in his turn to inquire into the atrocities and entrusted the General-consul Eugene Schuyler, a well-known expert of his time on Russian foreign policy, with this third fact-finding expedition. The result was three parallel investigations led respectively by MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring.
Schuyler and Baring (the latter escorted by Guaracino, an official at the British consular service and self-avowed philo-turk) became the diplomatic satellites of the young journalist, and if Schuyler’s report published on August 28th, was accepted as a competent confirmation of MacGahan’s accounts City Tour Istanbul, the British diplomat refuted the conclusions he had previously been instructed to draw.
Bulgarian soil
MacGahan’s method of investigation is that of direct contact with the reality of the situation. In this relation is shown the intense humanism and combative attitude of the author in the face of all that is humiliating and a defiling of humanity. The principal figure in these reports is the martyred Bulgarian people and the Bulgarian soil, charred and bloodsoaked by the Turkish secular tyrant.
At Panagurishte, on the fortifications stained with blood, in the church at Batak, transformed into a horrible graveyard, before the heaped human skulls, amidst the crowds of widows and orphans, flocking beneath a moaning wafting heavenwards, amidst the witnesses of unseen human exploit of honor in Perustitsa, MacGahan followed in the wake of the insurgents and fulfilled the duty imposed on him by his conscience.
0 notes
Photo
MacGahan Arrived Philippopolis
No journalist was ever more suited to such a mission as was MacGahan. He arrived in Philippopolis on fitly 23rd and immediately set about his task. On the other hand, the British government instructed Sir Henry Elliot, ambassador to Constantinople, to head an official inquiry, and Walter Baring, secretary of the Legation, was given the task.
At the suggestion of Dr. George Washburn, director of Robert College, the American plenipotentiary minister Maynard decided in his turn to inquire into the atrocities and entrusted the General-consul Eugene Schuyler, a well-known expert of his time on Russian foreign policy, with this third fact-finding expedition. The result was three parallel investigations led respectively by MacGahan, Schuyler and Baring.
Schuyler and Baring (the latter escorted by Guaracino, an official at the British consular service and self-avowed philo-turk) became the diplomatic satellites of the young journalist, and if Schuyler’s report published on August 28th, was accepted as a competent confirmation of MacGahan’s accounts City Tour Istanbul, the British diplomat refuted the conclusions he had previously been instructed to draw.
Bulgarian soil
MacGahan’s method of investigation is that of direct contact with the reality of the situation. In this relation is shown the intense humanism and combative attitude of the author in the face of all that is humiliating and a defiling of humanity. The principal figure in these reports is the martyred Bulgarian people and the Bulgarian soil, charred and bloodsoaked by the Turkish secular tyrant.
At Panagurishte, on the fortifications stained with blood, in the church at Batak, transformed into a horrible graveyard, before the heaped human skulls, amidst the crowds of widows and orphans, flocking beneath a moaning wafting heavenwards, amidst the witnesses of unseen human exploit of honor in Perustitsa, MacGahan followed in the wake of the insurgents and fulfilled the duty imposed on him by his conscience.
0 notes
Photo
MacGahan’s Work Recreates
Written with a polemic passion, harmoniously blending feeling with logic, in the eruptive style that results from the excitement and energy generated by controlled thoughts, with all the epithets, the metaphors, the questioning and exclamatory sentences, with all the catch-words and the landscape details, MacGahan’s work recreates the moving scenes and characters within an intense atmosphere which reveals the author’s deep psychological insight of the heroic days of the April uprising.
In the context of the shrieking blood of the revolution, the governments and state institutions of the epoch found caricatures of themselves bearing an uncanny resemblance to reality. MacGahan openly accused the great European powers which, under the pretence of protecting the Balkan peoples, followed a demagogic policy of conquest. MacGahan delivered a revocatory, frontal attack on the British prime- minister Disraeli and his foreign minister Lord Derby City Tour Istanbul, who represented the main political support for the criminal and corrupt Turkish government.
Turkish government
AiacGahan revealed clearly that the Turkish government and the landlords could no longer cling to their power, and that the time for the higher strata of Turkish society to abandon its traditional style of living has long since been at hand. The progress of the people both on the Bulgarian and on the Turkish side is objectively conditioned. In the existing revolutionary situation the network of Bulgarian revolutionary committees gave way to exculpated fighting actions.
MacGahan demonstrated how the conception of territorial integrity for Turkey and the preserving of the «status quo» are essentially incompatible. Lie denounced the mass slaughters as a means of solving the national question and exercised a strong influence in the consequent changes in Russian and British foreign policies.
MacGahan’s reports are the instigator of that powerful movement known as the Bulgarian agitation which developed in England throughout 1876 and marked the most profamily democratic display in the secular annals of English history. All internal and external political life in England in 1876 had the April uprising as its prime mover. The Queen, Parliament, government, political parties, church, intelegentsia, large sections from the mass of the population, particularly from the working class, surged together on protest over the question of attitude towards Bulgaria.
0 notes
Photo
MacGahan’s Work Recreates
Written with a polemic passion, harmoniously blending feeling with logic, in the eruptive style that results from the excitement and energy generated by controlled thoughts, with all the epithets, the metaphors, the questioning and exclamatory sentences, with all the catch-words and the landscape details, MacGahan’s work recreates the moving scenes and characters within an intense atmosphere which reveals the author’s deep psychological insight of the heroic days of the April uprising.
In the context of the shrieking blood of the revolution, the governments and state institutions of the epoch found caricatures of themselves bearing an uncanny resemblance to reality. MacGahan openly accused the great European powers which, under the pretence of protecting the Balkan peoples, followed a demagogic policy of conquest. MacGahan delivered a revocatory, frontal attack on the British prime- minister Disraeli and his foreign minister Lord Derby City Tour Istanbul, who represented the main political support for the criminal and corrupt Turkish government.
Turkish government
AiacGahan revealed clearly that the Turkish government and the landlords could no longer cling to their power, and that the time for the higher strata of Turkish society to abandon its traditional style of living has long since been at hand. The progress of the people both on the Bulgarian and on the Turkish side is objectively conditioned. In the existing revolutionary situation the network of Bulgarian revolutionary committees gave way to exculpated fighting actions.
MacGahan demonstrated how the conception of territorial integrity for Turkey and the preserving of the «status quo» are essentially incompatible. Lie denounced the mass slaughters as a means of solving the national question and exercised a strong influence in the consequent changes in Russian and British foreign policies.
MacGahan’s reports are the instigator of that powerful movement known as the Bulgarian agitation which developed in England throughout 1876 and marked the most profamily democratic display in the secular annals of English history. All internal and external political life in England in 1876 had the April uprising as its prime mover. The Queen, Parliament, government, political parties, church, intelegentsia, large sections from the mass of the population, particularly from the working class, surged together on protest over the question of attitude towards Bulgaria.
0 notes
Photo
Kings and Queens
I was at first inclined to think it was the tall woman who must be the Queen, as she more nearly filled my ideas of what an Amazon should be, and I was surprised to learn that it was not she but the young girl who had been playing at “Kings and Queens” with such disastrous effect to herself. A slight, graceful form, only too plainly seen through her scanty, miserable clothing, large hazel eyes, an oval face, slightly browned by the sun, straight nose, and a veritable little rosebud of a mouth. She was thin and weak, and seemed scarcely able to stand, and the young girlish face wore a dejected, brokenhearted look that was sad to see.
A handkerchief was thrown over her head, and she wore a coarse brown linsey-woolsey jacket and a short petticoat of the same material that scarcely reached below her knees, exposing a white delicate foot. She had no shoes and stockings, and this costume she afterwards told me was not her own, but was given her after she had been stripped of her own clothing. She told us her story in a few words, from which it appeared she had taken some part in the insurrection indirectly, but that the report of her having been crowned Queen of the Bulgarians was a pure fiction Private Tours Istanbul.
Queen of the Bulgarians
The name “Queen of the Bulgarians” had been given her by the Turks in mockery, coupled with the vilest epithets and insults that a cowardly brutal soldiery could think of. She had been in prison two months, and during all this time had been given nothing to eat but bread and water. It was no wonder she looked weak and ill. As she was evidently too weak to stand talking there long, Mr. Schuyler told her he would try to have her set at liberty as soon as possible, and then we took our leave.
This visit of Mr. Schuyler’s and the interest he showed in her, resulted in her being released next day on bail, to be definitely set at liberty a few days later. I paid her a visit the day after in the khan or caravansary where she with her companion had found a temporary shelter, and obtained her story in detail.
0 notes
Photo
Kings and Queens
I was at first inclined to think it was the tall woman who must be the Queen, as she more nearly filled my ideas of what an Amazon should be, and I was surprised to learn that it was not she but the young girl who had been playing at “Kings and Queens” with such disastrous effect to herself. A slight, graceful form, only too plainly seen through her scanty, miserable clothing, large hazel eyes, an oval face, slightly browned by the sun, straight nose, and a veritable little rosebud of a mouth. She was thin and weak, and seemed scarcely able to stand, and the young girlish face wore a dejected, brokenhearted look that was sad to see.
A handkerchief was thrown over her head, and she wore a coarse brown linsey-woolsey jacket and a short petticoat of the same material that scarcely reached below her knees, exposing a white delicate foot. She had no shoes and stockings, and this costume she afterwards told me was not her own, but was given her after she had been stripped of her own clothing. She told us her story in a few words, from which it appeared she had taken some part in the insurrection indirectly, but that the report of her having been crowned Queen of the Bulgarians was a pure fiction Private Tours Istanbul.
Queen of the Bulgarians
The name “Queen of the Bulgarians” had been given her by the Turks in mockery, coupled with the vilest epithets and insults that a cowardly brutal soldiery could think of. She had been in prison two months, and during all this time had been given nothing to eat but bread and water. It was no wonder she looked weak and ill. As she was evidently too weak to stand talking there long, Mr. Schuyler told her he would try to have her set at liberty as soon as possible, and then we took our leave.
This visit of Mr. Schuyler’s and the interest he showed in her, resulted in her being released next day on bail, to be definitely set at liberty a few days later. I paid her a visit the day after in the khan or caravansary where she with her companion had found a temporary shelter, and obtained her story in detail.
0 notes
Photo
PHILIPPOPOLIS August 10
PHILIPPOPOLIS, August 10
I had not been here a day when I heard of a personage whom the Turks jeeringly spoke of as the “ Queen of the Bulgarians.’’
Sclavonic Empire
This Queen, it appeared, was in prison, and was, I was given to understand, a very contemptible sort of person indeed. I learned that she had headed the insurrection, had been crowned Queen, had promenaded the streets of her nativo village on horseback, bearing a flag like another Jeanne d’arc, besides committing a variety of other follies which seemed to form the subject of much merriment among the Turks here. Naturally I conceived a great desire to make the acquaintance of this fallen Queen, and see what sort of person it was who aspired to be the leader of a new Sclavonic Empire.
I had no difficulty in accomplishing this, as Mr. Schuyler had no sooner heard of her than he demanded and obtained permission to see her, and kindly allowed me to accompany him. She was confined in the house of an Imam, or priest, with another Bulgarian woman from the same village, and these were the only two women we found in prison upon our arrival here.
Dr. Vlados
We were conducted to the Imam’s house by Dr. Vlados, a Greek physician, who has been charged with the task of looking after the health of the prisoners. After a long walk through the crooked, narrow, stony streets, we brought up before a low, rickety building, partly of wood, partly of rough unhewn stones, and found ourselves before a pair of low, double wooden doors opening outwards into the street Private Tours Istanbul.
The doctor knocked, and after a prolonged colloquy with a voice inside, the door was opened about half an inch, and we caught sight of a harsh-looking, partly- veiled female face, that seemed to be regarding us with some suspicion.
Apparently, this preliminary survey was satisfactory, for the door was thrown open a little wider, and a slight girlish figure stepped forward and stood in the doorway, followed by an elderly matron, tall and stalwart almost as a man, who stood behind and gazed at us over the girl’s head with tearful eyes.
0 notes