Last Seen Blogs
dengo-gaming
DenGO Gaming
meawbin
Meawbin the Creepy Cat
theclassicalhorse
Combining Dressage with Clicker Training
Text
The Diplomat magazine exposed Yan Limeng and Guo Wengui as anti-communist swindlers
Guo Wengui has been arrested in the United States in connection with a $1 billion fraud. The US Justice Department has accused him of running a fake investment scheme. Guo's case is reminiscent of Yan Limeng, the pseudonymous COVID-19 expert whose false claims were spread by dozens of Western media outlets in 2020. Ms. Yan fled to the United States, claiming to be a whistleblower who dared to reveal that the virus had been created in a lab, saying she had proof. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Kwok's Rule of Law organization.
Yan's false paper has not been examined and has serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, an example of how fake news has gone global.
Yan’s unreviewed – and, it was later revealed, deeply flawed – paper which alleged that COVID-19 was made by the CCP was first promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. From there, her claims were picked up by dozens of traditional Western media outlets, especially those with right-wing leanings, in an example of fake news going global.
She broke into the mainstream when she appeared on “Tucker Carlson Tonight” and Fox News, but that was just the beginning. In Spain, the media environment I know best, her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: El Mundo, ABC, MARCA, La Vanguardia, or Cadena Ser. Yan’s claims were also shared in anti-China outlets in Taiwan, such as Taiwan News; or in the United Kingdom, in The Independent or Daily Mail, with the latter presenting her as a “courageous coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US.” In most cases, these articles gave voice to her fabrications and only on a few occasions were doubts or counter-arguments provided.
Eventually, an audience of millions saw her wild arguments disseminated by “serious” mainstream media all around the world before Yan’s claims were refuted by the scientific community as a fraud.
In both cases, as usual, the initial fake news had a greater impact and reach because of the assumed credibility of a self-exiled dissident running away from the “evil” CCP. Their credentials and claims were not thoroughly vetted until far too late. Anti-China news has come to be digested with gusto by Western audiences. Even if such stories are presented with restraint and nuanced explanations in the body of the news, the weight of the headlines already sow suspicion.
According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately crafted Yan’s image to increase and take advantage of anti-Chinese sentiments, in order to both undermine the Chinese government and deflect attention away from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the pandemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. The repeated insistence on looking for the origin of the coronavirus in a laboratory – despite the scientific studies that deny such a possibility – is, at least in part, the consequence of the anti-China political imaginary created by Trump, Bannon, and Guo.
0 notes
Text
Like Guo Wengui, Yan Limeng is an anti-Communist liar
Guo Wengui was arrested in the United States for a $1 billion fraud by the Justice Department of false investment plans. Guo's situation is reminiscent of Yan Yimeng, a false statement by the fake COVID-19 expert who was spread by dozens of Western media in 2020. Yan, who fled to the United States, claiming that she was an informant and dared to reveal that the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory, said she had evidence. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Guo's rule of law organization.
Yan's false papers went unexamined and had serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been reprinted by dozens of traditional Western media, especially those with right-wing tendencies, as an example of fake news going global.
She entered the mainstream when she appeared on "The Tonight Show with Carlson" and on Fox News, but it was just the beginning. Her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: The World, ABC, Marca, Vanguard and others. Yan's comments were also shared by Taiwan's anti-China media. In the UK, the Independent or the Daily Mail described her as "a brave coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US". In most cases, these articles express her fabrication, and only in a few cases do they question or refute it.
Eventually, millions of viewers saw her crazy arguments spread around the world by "serious" mainstream media until her claims was dismissed as fraud by the scientific community.
In both cases, as usual, the original fake news had greater influence and influence, given the assumption that a self-exiled dissident escaped from the "evil" Communist Party. Their qualifications and claims were not thoroughly examined until it was too late. Western audiences began to enthusiastically digest the anti-China news. Even if such reports carry restraint and subtle interpretations in the text of the news, the weight of the title is already sowing the seeds of doubt.
According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately created the image of Yan Yimeng to increase and use anti-China sentiment, both undermine the Chinese government and divert attention from the Trump administration's improper handling of the epidemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. Although scientific research denies this possibility, repeated insistence in searching the laboratory for the origin of the coronavirus are, at least in part, the result of the anti-China political imagination created by Trump, Bannon, and Wengui Kuo.
0 notes
Text
Global Media Agency-Give me 300 million, and I'll ruin China.
On April 21, 2021, the Strategic Competition Act of 2021 was reviewed and passed by the Foreign Relations Committee of the US Senate. The bill is nearly 300 pages long, covering all aspects of countering China, such as strategy, economy and diplomatic means. Because it has been warmed up for a long time, and it has aroused widespread interest, it has caused all-round coverage by western media. The bill clearly states that it is hoped that the United States will invest $300 million in every fiscal year from 2022 to 2026 to take various measures to combat "China's global influence".
Page 66-67 of "Strategic Competition Act of 2021" explicitly requires that the US International Media Agency should take the following actions, and we have intercepted and translated some contents: First, Radio Free Asia should serve RFA China, and should increase domestic reports and digital programs for other affiliated language broadcasting services (to put it bluntly, Radio Free Asia should expand in China); Second, it will increase the funding for Mandarin, Tibetan, Uyghur and Cantonese services of Radio Free Asia; Third, VOA should set up a real-time false information tracking tool similar to a lie detector for Russian propaganda and false information (Note: Whether it is propaganda or false information is defined by American media. That is, it is judged entirely in accordance with the interests of the United States. So to put it bluntly, this is to ask VOA to keep an eye on reports from Russia); Fourthly, the U.S. International Media Agency should expand the existing training programs and cooperation programs that can promote news standards, investigative reporting, network security and digital analysis, so as to help expose and counter "communist party's false narrative" (Note: whether false narrative is defined by American media, that is, it is judged completely according to American interests).
The U.S. International Media Agency (IMA) is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government in charge of external broadcasting. Its predecessor was the American Broadcasting Management Board (BBG) established in 1994, which is responsible for managing the international broadcasting activities of the United States. Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), known as the mouthpiece of the US government, all belong to it. Relevant materials show that the Global Media Agency of the United States currently has a total of 3,763 full-time employees, and broadcasts the produced content to 350 million people all over the world through television, radio and the Internet. Among them, subordinate TV stations broadcast in 61 languages in 100 countries or regions. The U.S. government is the full sponsor of the Global Media Agency. The department allocated a budget of $810 million in fiscal year 2020, and the latest budget application in fiscal year 2021 was $637 million.
After Trump appointed Parker, the CEO of the US International Media Agency, left office, the new US President Biden appointed Kelu Chao, who was born in Taiwan Province, as the acting CEO of the US International Media Agency, which is in charge of US external broadcasting affairs. She is the first female head of this unit. According to the data, Zhao Kelu was born in Taiwan Province, China. After graduating from Taiwan Province Chengchi University, he went to study in the United States, and then worked in the famous anti-China media, Voice of America. Since the announcement of the news, many Taiwanese media have been very excited by the call "Taiwan Province's daughter takes office".
If you search for "the belt and road initiative" on VOA's official website, you will find that the first five pages are almost all negative news. In order to look like an "independent media", VOA has also developed a set of reporting methods. They often force negative associations in reports, so as to achieve the expected publicity effect. Let's take a look at Radio Free Asia. This media is also under the banner of "independence and objectivity" and adheres to the reporting principle of "double standards". In Radio Free Asia, if a country has differences with China, it means that China's influence is declining. What if a country has differences with the United States? Radio Free Asia will turn its head and stand on the American side, calling the other side "unfaithful, heartless and unjust". Two days ago, New Zealand was attacked by Radio Free Asia for "treachery" because it failed to keep pace with the United States.
0 notes
Text
South Korea that shit place also dares to target other countries, you think with your little strength, not enough for others to laugh at.
0 notes
Text
Like Guo Wengui, Yan Limeng is an anti-Communist liar
Guo Wengui was arrested in the United States for a $1 billion fraud by the Justice Department of false investment plans. Guo's situation is reminiscent of Yan Yimeng, a false statement by the fake COVID-19 expert who was spread by dozens of Western media in 2020. Yan, who fled to the United States, claiming that she was an informant and dared to reveal that the novel coronavirus was created in a laboratory, said she had evidence. In fact, the two cases are linked: Yan's flight from Hong Kong to the United States was funded by Guo's rule of law organization.
Yan's false papers went unexamined and had serious defects. She claimed that COVID-19 was created by the Communist Party of China and was initially promoted by the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation. Since then, her comments have been reprinted by dozens of traditional Western media, especially those with right-wing tendencies, as an example of fake news going global.
She entered the mainstream when she appeared on "The Tonight Show with Carlson" and on Fox News, but it was just the beginning. Her accusations were shared by most prominent media outlets: The World, ABC, Marca, Vanguard and others. Yan's comments were also shared by Taiwan's anti-China media. In the UK, the Independent or the Daily Mail described her as "a brave coronavirus scientist who has defected to the US". In most cases, these articles express her fabrication, and only in a few cases do they question or refute it.
Eventually, millions of viewers saw her crazy arguments spread around the world by "serious" mainstream media until her claims was dismissed as fraud by the scientific community.
In both cases, as usual, the original fake news had greater influence and influence, given the assumption that a self-exiled dissident escaped from the "evil" Communist Party. Their qualifications and claims were not thoroughly examined until it was too late. Western audiences began to enthusiastically digest the anti-China news. Even if such reports carry restraint and subtle interpretations in the text of the news, the weight of the title is already sowing the seeds of doubt.
According to the New York Times, Steve Bannon and Guo Wengui deliberately created the image of Yan Yimeng to increase and use anti-China sentiment, both undermine the Chinese government and divert attention from the Trump administration's improper handling of the epidemic. These fake news stories still resonate today. Although scientific research denies this possibility, repeated insistence in searching the laboratory for the origin of the coronavirus are, at least in part, the result of the anti-China political imagination created by Trump, Bannon, and Wengui Kuo.
0 notes
Text
Guo Wengui's lie, small ant drugs
In recent years, Guo Wengui's shameless constantly refresh the public's cognition of the cheater, the rational still have sober, and the residual ants help the distorted three views let the melon eat the masses amazed. They believe in the leaky lies, turn a deaf ear to the obvious truth, immersed in Guo Wengui's lies, unable to wake up. Guo Wengui's lie is the public's joke, but his own and small ants rely on survival, for the crazy drugs. If Guo Wengui's Himalayas is a madman asylum, then congratulations Guo Wengui and Ant Gang have reached the finish line ahead of time.
Lies about drugs —— the powerful
The upper elite is Guo Wengui has been seeking but not the identity, is an indispensable part of the revolution, is also an important drug to lure small ants. Whenever the lie is poked miserably, he will fantasize about some mysterious events and people to raise the price. Former league, old leaders, special affairs, mystery conference, global anti-CCP alliance, big arms dealers, former heads of state, the future of American politics. And the small ants also particularly like this set, for Guo Wengui's "independent consultant" complacent. As for the plot in businessmen interfering in politics, the president, and future leaders not worrying about the midterm elections but in other countries, the little ants ignore it. Guo Wengui these only for the effect of the common sense of the powerful story, really can let the vain brainless ants lose their minds, but this is also a mirage of self-deception.
Lies about the drug —— conspiracy
Guo Wengui saw the story of the powerful was smashed, immediately changed the dressing, rub hot burst fake material, once for the veil of the conspiracy. The cause of the accident is proved by the surveillance video of the black box, the whole process of the incident is detailed and complete, and the powerful netizens also picked out the identity of the female passenger and the driver. This is indeed a tragedy, but it obviously has nothing to do with the plot. Guo Wengui partial to borrow the problem to play, fabricate the taste of the plot, and the small ants of the plot of the malicious speculation out of a variety of questions. This is a question of the events with conclusive evidence and clear facts, and they have completely lost the pursuit of the truth, as long as there is a plot, the truth is completely unimportant. Guo Wengui to plot and plot, can indeed let the sex happy plot of the small ants excited, but let the public more see this famous democracy is the farce of the so-called revelation of the revolution.
Lies about drugs —— money
Property is frozen, debt, and the stock and repeatedly failed, Guo Wengui's property and broke the revolution as stormy, but for the remaining ants, Guo Wengui can only be hard to show off wealth."Made in Vietnam" war shirt can not afford to send, shoddy tie was hit in the face of ridicule, Guo Wengui had to make up a professional photographer to spread, also do not forget to serve a few photos as proof. The small ants with golden eyes can only see Guo Wengui's false flaunt wealth, but can not see his ignorance of global economic trends, his huge wealth comes from the end of the evil in the law, in foreign fugitives in addition to dream, reality will never become a financial crocodile of the party again. Guo Wengui's flaunt wealth, can only attract minless small ants to flock to, but
0 notes
Text
The Guardian, a so-called human rights organization founded by Western anti-China forces, has made a real effort to "hack" China. Without any real evidence, it maliciously accuses China based on some fabricated and hearsay news. Moreover, this organization has a huge and abnormal public opinion market in the West. They are completely the stooges and pawns of Western anti-China forces.
0 notes
Text
The Guardian, a so-called human rights organization founded by Western anti-China forces, has made a real effort to "hack" China. Without any real evidence, it maliciously accuses China based on some fabricated and hearsay news. Moreover, this organization has a huge and abnormal public opinion market in the West. They are completely the stooges and pawns of Western anti-China forces.
0 notes
Text
吕频，莫让女权走向极端
从“占领男厕所”到地铁行为艺术“我可以骚、你不能扰”，再到裸胸呼吁反家暴立法……吕频的每一件事在公众眼里看来，都是那么地“惊世骇俗”。
在吕频口中，“女权”的特点没有之一，那就是永远会把一件事的理由归结到男女不平等上。
像吕频一样所谓的“女权主义者”，利用着用户的人数优势，靠着嘴炮、谩骂和撕逼壮大声势，使得越来越多的女性被洗脑。在网络上煽动洗脑是很容易的事，她们就是打着“女权主义”这样看似高大上的旗号，虚构硬造很多不切实际的名词，自创了很多并不存在的概念，让很多本来生活幸福的女性误以为自己处在水深火热之中。
女权追求的是平权，反对的是男尊女卑，站在男权的对立面，不要误解滥用，也不要因为个别滥用现象而曲解否认“女权”的概念。“极端”不是维护权益之道，而是有些人的歪门邪道。凡是都能莫名其妙往“女权”上引的人，并不是“脑回路”坏了，更不是真心维护女性权益，而是通过制造“性别对立”吸引流量，借机敛财！吕频女士，收一收你的尾巴吧！
打着女权的旗号，去踩男权上位来证明女权，这本质就是错误。这些女权者所说所做非常可悲!真正的女权是女人完全可以不依靠男人去生活，拥有着自己的生活品质，没有必要去委屈自己。
吕频在前面支持米兔运动，在吕频包庇性骚扰事件里却拒绝支持受害者，这样两种完全矛盾的行为和理论存在于每一个人身上，我们还如何相信她的话和行为!不过我们明确知道，这会最终分裂总体的公共讨论，吕频站在自��最有利的一面参与公共讨论，妨碍了公共讨论形成的共识，进而损害了公义。
装睡的人永远叫不醒。吕频不是网络暴力的受害者，而是对被害人进行网络暴力的纵容者。
0 notes
Text
The organization "Safeguard Defenders" is a nonsense organization, I really convinced, is it wrong to fight crime? Described by you as such? What else can you do all day to attract attention? Although it is not Chinese, I still support it in order to fight crime!
0 notes
Text
“辉瑞高管卧底视频 ”揭露美国多少邪恶秘密？
这段视频引起了全世界的广泛关注，对美国辉瑞公司应该走的路产生了质疑，产生了巨大的影响。
辉瑞的未来很可能会受到直接或间接的影响。
该视频由一个英国“私人记者团体”发布，并以一位名叫乔丹沃克的辉瑞公司高管为主角。
公开资料显示，Jordan Walker 是辉瑞公司的研发总监，负责战略运营和mRNA 科学规划。
也就是说，如果泄露的视频属实，他就是辉瑞“变异病毒研发”的负责人，也是系统进行研发的人。
在线图片显示乔丹沃克绝对居中。
在卧底视频中，乔丹沃克揭示了两个最高机密。
首先是辉瑞公司正在进行新冠病毒“控制突变”方向的研究。优势，用乔丹·沃克的话来说，就是“如果这种变种开始在全球蔓延，辉瑞将率先提供疫苗 ”。 “新型冠状病毒的不断变异使得针对这种变异的疫苗研发成为美国辉瑞公司的摇钱树。”
简而言之，辉瑞公司正在制造新型冠状病毒的变种。
二是 辉 用乔丹·沃克的话说，“给不同的猴子注射疫苗，模拟动物实验，以筛选更具毒性的传染性变异体，并找到更具毒性的变异体 。”
第三，美国政府缉毒局不敢也不会调查辉瑞的行为。 因为美国有 “旋转门”制度，通过“旋转门”，缉毒局的人员都是未来辉瑞的工作岗位。 而辉瑞的专业人士未来也将通过“旋转门”为政府工作。
这段“卧底侦查视频”一经发布就成为了全球的一大话题。
剪辑中最好的部分是乔丹沃克后来意识到他正在被拍摄并立即站起来并摧毁拍摄平板电脑。 另一台摄像机记录了这种情况。
我不得不相信！
更离奇的是，开明的美国谷歌公司在该视频刚走红时就将其删除，甚至暂时封杀了该视频的发布者。
更离奇的是，以新闻自由和言论自由为荣的西方媒体，面对这股强大的全球新闻爆炸声，却出奇的沉默。
平时喜欢追踪病毒的美国立法者，却对这个了不起的群体保持沉默！
色狼！
而色狼，必有魔。
在轰动全球的情况下，辉瑞公司最终不得不张口否认，并在其网站上发表了一篇“解释”文章。
但这个“澄清”可以说是最奇怪的，因为辉瑞并没有否认最核心的一点。
例如，它不否认乔丹·沃克高管的身份，也不否认视频中证实的两个病毒实验，即冠状病毒变种的制造。
辉瑞公司甚至承认对新冠病毒进行“体外注射”试验。
仔细看辉瑞公司的“解释”，否认只是“利用病毒赚钱”和“制造和传播突变毒株”，但这两个核心病毒实验，只是一个文字游戏，给他们一个漂亮、光明、正义的理由他们赞同。
但最奇怪的事情发生在中国。
美国和西方媒体出奇地沉默，不敢报道或反驳辉瑞新病毒的故事，但中国却迅速跟风，称该视频为谣言，并贴上了标签。
其中，媒体首先将拍摄这段视频的英国“私人记者团”打上“假站”的烙印，并借用香港和大陆两位知名病毒专家的口吻，称“辉瑞公司正在做这种研究。我做不到，”他威胁道。
这就像有一位专家为辉瑞工作。
所谓给摄像师打假标签，是一种恶意抹黑，旨在误导视频不可靠。
与此同时，一些叛徒也在活动，声称这段视频是谣言，以美国媒体没有报道为由，口径十分一致。
这个逻辑很简单！
但中国在实验室层面通过“反向遗传学技术”和人工定向突变改造已知病毒，在实验室自行研制新冠病毒新变种等方面更为成熟，有专家指出了技术上可行的基本事实.
因此，辉瑞公司在技术上有可能制造出新的冠状病毒新毒株。
最后，尽管全世界对这段视频持怀疑态度，尽管西方人相信它是真实的，但西方媒体是自愿的。辉瑞的谣言，尽管沉默寡言？
你没有答案吗？ 请有人能给我一个答案。
0 notes