athenawasamerf
Women Will Save The World
M.D. ♈️ LGB
24226 posts
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
thesupremerabe
And Yes, She Matters To You.
allaboutthatlace
Sweet Lolita Detailing
the60s70s
The 60's & 70's
ju5tcur1ous
Admirin'
nicacoola
NicaCoola
Text
In World War II, Nazi Germany established brothels in the concentration camps (Lagerbordell, Sonderbauten or Freudenabteilungen "Joy Divisions") to increase productivity among male inmates.
In the end, the camp brothels did not produce any noticeable increase in the prisoners' productivity levels, but instead, created a market for coupons among the camp VIPs.
Here's a few of the locations where this happened:
Mauthausen/Gusen, Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Neuengamme, Dachau, Dora-Mittelbau, Sachsenhausen, Flossenbürg and others
The women forced into these brothels came mainly from the women-only Ravensbrück concentration camp, except for Auschwitz, which "employed" its own prisoners.
In combination with the German military brothels in World War II, it is estimated that at least 34,140 female inmates were forced into sexual slavery during the Third Reich.
The brothels form the subject of "Das KZ Bordell" (The Concentration Camp Brothel) by Robert Sommer, a book that has been hailed as the first comprehensive account of a little known chapter of Nazi oppression in World War Two.
It explores the origins, structure and impact of the "Sonderbauten" (special buildings) run by Heinrich Himmler's SS in Germany and Nazi-occupied Europe.
"In the collective memory and written history of World War Two, the camp brothels were for a long time taboo," the 35-year-old Berliner told Reuters. "The former prisoners didn't want to talk about it: it was a difficult subject to handle."
"It didn't fit so easily into the postwar image of the concentration camps as monuments to suffering."
According to concentration camp survivors the women in those brothels were replaced every 6 months and the women who got replaced were killed in gas chambers.
It is important to note that we distinctively speak of sexual slavery here and of rape.
I wanted to point this out especially because I have been seeing liberal feminists talking about this topic, calling it "forced sex-work", "forced sex-labour" etc.
It is beyond disrespectful to call these female victims "sex-workers" or "employees" when their sexuality was brutally exploited, their diginities taken, their health was sacrificed, they were raped repeatedly and then executed after 6 months, even though they were promised to be released after those months. But those promises of course were never honored.
Liberal feminism and radical feminism differs a lot when it comes to views on the topic of prostitution but this does NOT excuse labeling victims of abuse and rape as "sex-workers" or calling their suffering "forced sex-labour."
422 notes
·
View notes
Text
I guess this is an unpopular opinion, but I think the label "pick me" is being used wayyy to frequently now.
Calling a girl a pick me when she simply says (without shaming anyone) "I don't wear makeup", "I don't sleep around", or "I don't party" is a reflection on how you view your own lifestyle.
If you feel the need to call a girl a pick me because she can proudly say she doesn't wear makeup or she doesn't participate in hookup culture you're showing that you are insecure about your lifestyle and how you present yourself. Calling a girl a pick me because she can proudly live life as your opposite is a reflection on you. Maybe reflect on why you are so threatened by women who don't wear makeup and are proud of it before you call anyone a pick me.
56 notes
·
View notes
Text
if you’re unwilling to cleanly cut off rapists from your social group i think you have no business calling yourself a feminist or claiming solidarity with other women. it’s really the bare minimum action in supporting other women and if you won’t do it you aren’t shit.
169 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's crazy how ppl hate on Rowling, and praise Stephen King for speaking against her, when only one of them has written a child orgy in their books and it wasn't her
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm blocked but huh... sounds familiar...
First image is righteous indignance but second image is a hate crime. That's male hypocrisy for you.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
“girls support girls” no. girls protect girls. I could hate a girl to death and I still wouldn’t take my eyes off her drink at a party, I could hate her like she was the devil but still I wouldn’t make her go back to a man that was beating her.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
if you’re unwilling to cleanly cut off rapists from your social group i think you have no business calling yourself a feminist or claiming solidarity with other women. it’s really the bare minimum action in supporting other women and if you won’t do it you aren’t shit.
169 notes
·
View notes
Text
291 notes
·
View notes
Text
Quote from a friend.
"In Canada, if a man assaults, rapes, murders a woman, it's just a regular crime.
But if a woman tries to remove a man from the womens change room so she can have bodily privacy while she's naked, she will be charged with a hate crime.
Let that info marinate as long as it needs to."
671 notes
·
View notes
Text
breaks my soul when a woman defends men against an angry woman. like babe they’re not smiling at you because they think you’re kind or a good person. they are ecstatic that you put them first. they think they’ve found good prey. they don’t give a fuck for your kindness. they think you’re fuckable and will probably be submissive in bed. they are thinking the most degrading things abt you. you are not defending them, you are HUMILIATING yourself and all of us in front of them please stop 😫😫😩
64 notes
·
View notes
Text
I find it really upsetting when leftists sexualize Abby Shapiro for having big boobs. Like Vaush going on about how she should show off her cleavage on twitch for money or how Xanderhal kept going on about her "milkers" in his streams about her. Like she's a judgemental self righteous douche* but she makes it a point that she does not want to be sexualized, so antagonistically mocking her and pushing that boundary just to spite her is incredibly misogynistic. Because what's funny about it? The joke is just "LMAO woman doesn't like being sexualized and I'm doing it anyways!!XD" it just cements the fact that a lot of left wing people only care about progressive values so long as they can weaponize it. It's just really fucking disheartening. Just because a woman is conservative does not give you a free pass to sexually harass and objectify her. Focus on her shitty politics, not her body.
[TERFS/RADFEMS DNI THIS ISN'T FOR YOU]
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Males wouldn't achieve shit if women weren't there for them. And yet, it's women who are considered inherently incapable.
287 notes
·
View notes
Text
Right wing Republican politicians and even some Democrats are frothing at the mouth in outrage over pro-Palestinian student protests. Some are calling for arrest, others for the National Guard to suppress these protests. The central rationale is equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism, a false equivalence intended to shut down the protests.
But where was the outrage on the right over decades of christofascist demonstrations at Planned Parenthood clinics? Why was no one calling for the arrest of the mobs of hateful, screaming zealots who inspired bombings and murder? Why today are LGBTQ event organizers forced to arrange their own security as protection from actual Nazis threatening their existence?
Hate speech is hate speech no matter if the target is black or gay or Jewish or fat or trans. No one of these groups deserves more protection than the others.
Protesting for changes in government policies is NOT hate speech. Policies don’t have feelings. Policies can’t be traumatized. In the USA we have a right to protest peacefully.
850 notes
·
View notes