My best friend died last week. He and 21 other innocent concert-goers were murdered by an individual to whom no attention should be paid. We cherish the memory of the victims and we mourn with their families.
Megan Hurley, Courtney Boyle, Philip Tron, Wendy Fawell, Elaine McIver, Eilidh MacLeod, Chloe Rutherford, Liam Curry, Sorrell Leczkowski, Nell Jones, Michelle Kiss, Jane Tweddle-Taylor, Marcin Klis, Angelika Klis, Kelly Brewster, Olivia Campbell, John Atkinson, Alison Howe, Lisa Lees, Saffie Rose Roussos, Georgina Callander and my dear friend Martyn Hett.
Somebody else who offered their condolences was one King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques and the head of the autocratic Saud family that have ruled Saudi Arabia since the foundation of the modern state in 1932. He picked up the phone to his staunch ally Prime Minister Theresa May and, like many of the worldâs leaders, condemned the attack and committed to standing shoulder to shoulder with Britain in the ongoing war on terror.
There is no reason to believe his words were insincere. Saudi Arabia has, after all, fallen victim to terrorism countless times on its own soil. Yet, there is a story thatâs not being told, touched upon briefly by Caroline Lucas in Wednesdayâs General Election debate. As Lucas underlined, the UK is the worldâs second biggest arms dealer and delivers its bombs and guns to 22 of the 30 countries on our Governmentâs own human rights watch list.
It should come as no surprise that Saudi Arabia is high on that list with its repressive male guardianship system; its routine imprisonment, torture and execution of LGBT people and its complete disregard for the freedoms of expression, association and belief. Thatâs before you even consider the Saudi-led bombing raids on Yemen, which the UN confirms have been the single biggest cause of the thousands of lives lost in the bloody conflict in the Arab worldâs poorest country. The list of Saudi atrocities is long and the victims are too numerous to name. So why is it that British firms have sold ÂŁ3 billion worth of weapons to the Saudis in the last three years alone, while the British government continues to send an a annual aid package amounting to less than a tenth of that revenue to Yemen? Our governmentâs support for the Al Saud family makes us complicit in mass murder. Sadly, at Wednesdayâs debate, Theresa May was too busy to defend her governmentâs appalling record. What was so preoccupying that the election she called remains unclear. However, when confronted about the issue, her foot-soldier, Home Secretary Amber Rudd, merely shrugged: âItâs good for industry.â
So what does all this have to do with the callous murder of 22 people in Manchester last week? Well, it requires us to look into the ideology that drove that sorry man to commit such an act. The Saudi state-sponsored brand of Islam known as Wahhabism is widely considered to be at the source of much extremist thought. In the words of the worldâs largest Muslim youth organisation, it is characterised by antipathy â at times violent â towards Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists and even other Sunni Muslims who do not share the Wahhabisâ rigid and authoritarian view of Islam.
âFor more than fifty years, Saudi Arabia has systematically propagated a supremacist, ultraconservative interpretation of Islam among Sunni Muslim populations worldwide,â reads the official statement released by the Indonesian Muslim youth movement Gerakan Pemuda Ansor the day after my friend was killed. âThe Wahhabi/ultraconservative view of Islamâwhich is embraced not only by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, but also by al-Qaeda and ISISâis intricately wedded to those elements of classical Islamic law that foster sectarian hatred and violence.â
I do not blame Theresa May or her government for the death of my friend, nor do I hold anyone responsible for the depraved act other than the perpetrator himself, but we cannot afford not to look at things in their context. To shrug off complicity in the killing of thousands of innocents for the sake of industry is, to my mind, criminal. To turn a blind eye to Saudi Arabiaâs aggressive propagation of an ultraconservative perversion of Islam and its role in the radicalisation of young minds is equally incriminating.
So while you might attack Jeremy Corbyn for his failure to recall a figure when pushed by Emma Barnett on Womanâs Hour earlier this week, for his shabby appearance or, God forbid, his policies, you cannot possibly fault him on the pledge to end the sale of arms to the Kingdom after almost 60 years. On 8th June, it is with conviction that I will cast my vote for Labour and for our best chance of a foreign policy we can be proud of: one that does not just aim to cash in on arms deals regardless of the consequences, but one where trade deals are conditional on the guarantee of universal human rights, democracy and the rule of law.
My best friend died last week. My best friend died last week. He and 21 other innocent concert-goers were murdered by an individual to whom no attention should be paid.
The campaign for the UK to leave the EU, as ugly as it has become, seems to have monopolised the patriotic vote in the upcoming referendum. The media appear to be succeeding in conning people into believing that if you love your country, the only option is to vote leave. The myth of Brexit theyâre fabricating involves a valiant fight to claw back British sovereignty from big, bad Brussels.âŠ
Swipe left: Internet & the EUÂ referendum Interesting look from our Sam Miles at how younger voters in the referendum are, willingly other otherwise, being marginalised in the Referendum debate.
Vote Remain and support British Science and Universities
Vote Remain and support British Science and Universities
In a referendum debate where swathes of the British media have no qualms about publishing an endless barrage of scaremongering half-truths, it is refreshing to hear clear, fact-based arguments from passionate pro-European voices. Representatives of British universities and the UK science community came together at the British Chamber of Commerce in Belgiumearlier this week to set out exactly whyâŠ
Reasons to celebrate our European neighbours and remain in the EU
The European Unionâs principle of the freedom of movement is getting some pretty bad press these days. The British media, UKIP and unsavoury former Apprentice candidatesseem all too happy to do away with any semblance of critical analysis and resort to facile conflations for their own Brexitty ends. The UK, so the argumentâŠ
âIrregular migrantsâ â this is kind of disdainful expression being used in the current crisis to describe refugees; the thousands of people fleeing their homes not only in Syria, but also Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea, Nigeria, South Sudan and beyond. Theyâre packing up and heading to Europe, not for the fun of it, but to avoid being caught up in the proxy wars of world powers, the tyrannyâŠ
You might have missed the brief rolling of eyes on social media last week when Out&ProudUK â the LGBT campaign to leave the European Union â came out of the closet. The campaign, run by one Adam Lake, aims to emancipate LGBTI Brits from their apparently naive belief that the EU protects and promotes their civil rights. Lake believes heâs doing us the favour of removing the shackles of thisâŠ
As if it's ever ok to take a phone call in the library AND be barefoot. #fauxpas #literally and #figuratively (at Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen KU Leuven)