If there’s a dragon in cr you know I’m gonna turn it into a cookie. I like the idea that their attire would reflect dark cacao kingdom culture/maybe be the inspiration for it? Kinda wanna draw baby black and white dragon too

👩‍❤️‍💋‍👩my cuties

silly old man ⁉️

I won’t stop talking about the fact that this is a cacaonilla song

derealization again

I hate this feeling

OLD MAN YAOI!!!! 🐛

my hyperfixation on the Dragon Lotus is gone, but the drawings remain

dude you really changed

(on the right is a very old drawing)

we must know the ethics of art in general, and understand what an artist is and what his art is. these concepts must be separate from each other if we evaluate only the artist’s work, and not the artist himself

/I hope that I correctly understood the message of your message..

it really really sucks how we consider art as a way to determine our moral compass. i know other posts have discussed it before but i HATE how when we discover an artist is a controversial or “bad” person we immediately denounce their art, saying their art is automatically bad. and that’s not what art is supposed to be. when you like an art piece, that doesn’t mean you support the creator and everything they stand for, it doesn’t even mean you Support the intention behind the piece itself. the entire POINT of art is to interpret it for yourself, taking context clues from the intention/message behind it. and sometimes the message/intention of a piece is “good” sometimes it’s “bad”. that doesn’t mean you as a viewer is “bad” for interpreting a “bad” piece. that’s like….. getting rid of the meaning of art… it sucks how we think that “good” art can only be made by “good” people and “bad” art can only be made by “bad” people. when you say “oh this artist turned out to be Bad, that means their art is bad now” what does that say about about “good” people? that their art is only good because they’re good? that their art is measured by the moral compass behind it and that value can be changed very quickly because they have the capacity for doing “bad”? news flash, we’re all human, and none of us are inherently good or bad. and the things we create can mean ANYTHING, and denouncing art based on the artist’s character gets rid of the entire purpose of art in the first place.

lets think about pablo picasso, he was a fantastic and influential artist, but he was also a misogynist. liking picasso’s art or acknowledging his place in the art history absolutely doesn’t mean you think he was right for dehumanizing women. not once does that imply that you hate women for appreciating his work, technique, and contribution to our culture. does his actions outside of being an artist make his art bad? are you really going to look at Guernica and think “well, i’m not allowed to acknowledge or discuss this message about the horrors of fascism and war, because the artist behind it thought women were doormats, therefore i’m a bad person for not immediately viewing this painting as ‘bad.’ so…” how does that make us sound?

you’re allowed to acknowledge that, unfortunately, bad people make good stuff. that doesn’t make you a bad person. and we NEED to realize this if we don’t want art as a culture and as a human instinct to lose its worth

Spoiler💅💅💅

Draw something, not sexual nudes🙅‍♀️🙅‍♀️🙅‍♀️only sketches of women’s beauty

I love your art so much i look forward to seeing more from you ( i eat up all your cookie run oc's)

🥹🥹🥹 thank you for your pleasant words, it’s motivating me to not give up🙏🙏

i’ll do more later second oc belongs to @filthymysterymeat

I decided to remake the dragon designs based on certain cultures and mythologies......

Gentle sketch

i can’t finish them😭

they’re funny best friends