"Kishimoto make sasuke and naruto gay intentionally and not on accident" Okay then so why did he go on multiple interviews insisting that naruto and sasuke's relationship is brotherly and is inspired from his twin brother and that people shouldn't interpret their bond as romantic but platonic?? Source : https://twitter* com/uchihassasusaku/status/1419104011265974275?

If a writer writes homoerotic subtext in his material and expects people to read the material as romantic, he doesnt go around calling the characters "siblings" and asking people to not interpret their dynamic as romantic because then people wont read into his queer subtext like he wanted to

Ship what you want to ship. But stop acting like everyone should buy into your delusions. Kishimoto never said or implied that he wanted naruto and sasuke to be seen as gay but he did say many times that their relationship is brotherly

Ah, another shipper who ships a ship where creator implied twice they never kissed. And whose couple never had a meaningful conversation in a 700 chapter manga. And linking me to some SS stan who gave Elon Musk money for bluecheck mark. 🤣 A good ground to stand on. Okay, I will guide you by the hand since you don't seem to understand. It's okay, illiteracy is a common problem these days. I will put this in easy sections for you, with added links.

Also you and your "queer" nonsense... we are talking about gay, homosexuality. Not slurs.

About the interviews:

The Kizuna thing isn't even written by him, it's an article by another person. These books aren't written by the mangakas ever, they do not have the time nor is the article written from Kishi's pov. Shocker, people write a lot of things in anime merchandise that the creator isn't even involved in. [link] If it were written by Kishi, then an interviewer wouldn't have had to ask Kishi years later whether brotherly relationship was what he was going for with Naruto and Sasuke's bond, and Kishi wouldn't have had given such a cryptic answer where he mulls over it. Because he would have given the answers years back already. Also the fact that he's asked to define their relationship shows how weird it is to the readers. He NEVER told people to not interpret their relationship as romantic. And personally, I have seen movies and a comic where two characters referred to each other as brothers, and their creator referred to them as "soul brothers" but later revealed them to also have romantic feelings.

But I don't expect your mind to be able to comprehend things like this, it does require a little bit of 1+1=2 math. The interview about Seishi is about the feeling of empathy, not that they are literally Naruto and Sasuke's characters. It is one aspect. Kishi has joked about how Naruto and Sasuke are him and his editor too, because he will try to impress his editor. So? And he has said Kushina is based on his wife. So Naruto is him and Kushina is his wife? Why aren't you freaking about this freudian stuff? I know why. I also remember someone saying if Kishi REALLY saw his relationship with his brother as the exact same as Naruto and Sasuke, his brother would need a restraining order against him. It was funny and accurate.

I have wrote about the inconsistencies in his interviews and what shows that he definitely didn't write their dynamic as the same as with his brother despite having one aspect of it [link] and here is another post talking about it more deeply (they also linked my post I just mentioned) [link]. This post also explains how Kishimoto wrote Naruto constantly to do what Sakura can't for Sasuke, and she also included many links to my other posts where I talk about how Kishi wrote Sakura and Sasuke's dynamic, which you can also read if you feel like it. Unless you are scared of being proved wrong, you will read those right, or at least the linked post itself?

About how the audience perceives their dynamic:

The thing is, you and SS fandom don't understand how stories are written. Authors don't do stuff randomly. They use narrative and literary devices to tell their story. Kishi himself has remarked on it many times how careful he is about writing characters, how much he does research, how careful he is about angles etc. [link] If Naruto and Sasuke's relationship was written as brotherly in the text, in the manga, it wouldn't make a bunch of people uncomfortable. There wouldn't have been meltdowns after specific chapters nor would we have people saying when the manga was going on that they are annoyed by the "gay stuff". [link] [link] [link] (there are many more, but here's some collections for an example). Here's one more talking about the Japanese fandom. [link]

When Luffy was saving Ace in Impel Town/Marineford arc, no one in the dudebro community was uncomfortable nor saying it was gay. Eventhough it was a touching and dramatic storyline that showed us how much the two cared about each other. When Alibaba and Cassim were having their past and relationship unravelled in Magi, no one was uncomfortable. Eventhough it was tragic and dramatic and touching yet again. Because despite neither of these pairs being blood-brothers, they were WRITTEN to have a brotherly dynamic/development/relationship in the text, in their behavior. Which is why this also translated to the audience successfully.

If Naruto and Sasuke were written to be brotherly, they would refer to each other as such, including in Boruto, and would tell other people such as well. Hell, they would be proud to tell other people that this person they respect and admire the most is like a brother to them. But they don't. Naruto even told Hagoromo they aren't siblings, but friends. Sasuke said he has only one brother and that is Itachi. If they were brotherly, Kishi wouldn't make Naruto kiss Sasuke, even if accidentally, and have that to be their first interaction. He wouldn't say he wants to be the first one to have rivals kiss in shounen. Not a single brotherly relationship in media is written like this. You know, tropes matter. He wouldn't have Sasuke think fondly about the kiss as one of his most precious memories when he is dying, while years later implying more than once Sasuke never kissed Sakura lol. He wouldn't say Sakura had her first kiss stolen by her rival Naruto. He wouldn't make Sakura be jealous of Naruto's importance to Sasuke, while also giving her zero importance in saving Sasuke. He would not constantly make fun of Sakura by having her be thirsty/desperate for Sasuke's attention, any little crumb from him, while Sasuke ignores her and focuses on Naruto. Kishi knows how his writing comes off. Plenty of people, both men and women who weren't shippers, made jokes about Sasuke going "where's Naruto? hey Naruto" whenever Sakura speaks. Because Kishi made it such a constant dynamic with the three of them. People who have the basic amount of media literacy will get it, and thus all those jokes and memes were born. [link] [link] [link]

If they were brotherly, the anime studio wouldn't have them make eyes at each other while lyrics "please kiss me all night" play in the background, aside from all the other gay ops/ends with romantic lyrics to them. And since Kishi watches the anime, he would have probably point out it's weird. That's what I would do if I wrote about my relationship with my brother and people did that. Magi anime didn't have Alibaba and Cassim in romantic endings...

Kishi wouldn't put this in the movie he made if he wanted them to appear as brothers. Everyone was saying this looked gay/homoerotic when the movie dropped. I saw men on forums say "lol this looks so homoerotic, why did he have to catch Sasuke like that" and even in Chinese theaters people were giggling during this scene. Because it's so in your face fanservice. And Kishi said he cares about angles a lot in his story and that he redraws them if they aren't good enough to drive the message home. So what exactly does that tell you?

People usually aren't sexual about their brother

He wouldn't sexualize and put so much homoeroticism surrounding Sasuke's character, if Sasuke was solely inspired by his brother. You know, unless he had a questionable obsession with his brother. [link]

He wouldn't make Naruto literally get sexually excited when about to fight Sasuke lol [link] [link] that's so obvious Japanese men got amused, uncomfortable and even angry about it, if Sasuke and Naruto were him and his brother.

Romantic tropes/brotherly tropes are not the same

The fact Kishimoto's het couples parallel Naruto and Sasuke's dynamic is very evident. If "brotherly" relationship resembles romantic couples by the same author instead of the other brother dynamics he has written, guess what, it's not written as a brother dynamic lol. Again, proof that he didn't write their dynamic as brotherly. Both Mario/Saori [link] [link] and Minato/Kushina [link] [link] parallel Naruto/Sasuke and have the same tropes as them.

Raikage/Killer B is written as a normal brother relationship. Itachi/Sasuke is written as a complicated brother relationship with a lot of tragedy. Shikamaru/Choji is written as a normal friendship. Kakashi/Obito is written as a complicated friendship with a lot of tragedy. Naruto/Sasuke resembles the romantic relationships Kishimoto wrote, instead of these ones I mentioned. Even in their world, Naruto's actions are seen as irrational and obsession, and the weirdness of it all is constantly pointed out, by Sai, Kabuto, Sakura, Raikage, Itachi. This is a choice Kishi made when he wrote them. [link]

He also made a homage to Devilman and Akira/Ryo relationship that even people in the Japanese fandom noticed. [link] He specifically picked the chapter where Ryo admits having romantic feelings for Akira, and the fight (which parallels Vote2) ending with Ryo realizing how deep his feelings for Akira lie. Kishimoto would not do that if Naruto and Sasuke were based on him and his brother. Why would he pick a character famous for being gay for his best friend/enemy in a chapter where we finally get to see inside Sasuke's head?

Aside from paralleling Hinata's feelings towards Naruto in the Pain arc with Naruto's feelings towards Sasuke in the very next arc, he also foreshadowed a romantic double-suicide with Naruto and Sasuke during said arc. ROMANTIC. [link]

Sasuke on the other hand, was never satisfied with Naruto calling him brother or friend. If their relationship was strictly brotherly, they wouldn't need to ponder about the nature of their relationship, because that's not how any brotherly relationship is written in media. [link]

Kishimoto dislikes SS and talks about Sakura's "love" negatively more than once. [link] Sakura's love is selfish, toxic... yet this doesn't mean anything. Sakura wanted to save Sasuke, yet the one Sasuke said saved him was Naruto.

Now think hard. Use the modest intellect you possess. So aside from Kishimoto having Naruto show sexual attraction towards Sasuke to the point it made Japanese men uncomfortable, he also used romantic tropes (one of them being double-suicide which a writer Kishimoto admires is famous for because he mostly wrote romantic plays ending in that) and romantic parallels to show Naruto's feelings towards Sasuke multiple times, which he did not use for other male friendships in the manga. To the point many Japanese men wondered why Kishimoto "has to push homosexual agenda with Naruto's character", despite the fact he's supposed to be " a normal/good guy". All of these things somehow do not mean anything, nor do the multiple other things I have pointed out on my blog.

I'm not asking you to "buy" into anything, because understanding Naruto is a love story between Naruto and Sasuke and that Kishimoto does not even like Sakura let alone SS would require a little bit of reading comprehension and common sense. Which you and the person you linked sacrificed at the pink altar of Sakura worship, because to you not having anything in common with your partner nor having anything meaningful to talk about nor knowing anything about each other is somehow love. To you having someone else help and understand the person you love because you can't somehow makes an ideal relationship. You mistake Sakura's onesided melodrama for love. She has never said anything meaningful about Sasuke's character, neither has Sasuke said anything meaningful about her. Yet you believe Kishi wrote some deep relationship between them. How am I supposed to reason with someone like that? But your gaslighting doesn't phase me, I have seen all this before many times, it's old news by now. You can call me delusional all you want, but I trust my own understanding thank you very much. It's not like that much is even required, as proven by how many people, even the ones that don't have any need to (casual viewers, straight men, etc.) see it, still see it. Because it is that obvious that only desperate need to not see it blinds someone like you from seeing it.

I'm actually working on another post about Narusasu and Kishi's writing tools regarding it, so stay tuned 🩷

the jump shop changed sakura's age from 17 to 16 in the war https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku/status/1694437115403067409?s=20 source below. they said japanese fans complained and they changed sakura's age in the games too. but databooks are written by kishimoto right? how did he not change it form the get go? everyone in sakura's class graduated at 12. shino and hinata are from january and december respectively and they're always the same age in databooks except 4th because it ends in october. why did they do that? they also changed obito's age. does it mean kishimoto is stupid and never realized the mistake or jump is trying to change his own version of the events?

Kishimoto didn't make a mistake, he and Shonen Jump had plenty of time to fix any errors regarding the character ages if they existed, but the manga and the databooks remained consistent with them. I'm therefore definitely gonna take their word for it over some random online merch company. Kishi is Japanese; he obviously knows how their school system works, and people should really know by now that the Konoha Academy doesn't follow the same rules.

I mean, in addition to the obvious Databook 4 evidence proving that Sakura is older, all of the Konoha Rookie 9 graduated when they were 12 years old, including Shino (whose birthday is January 23rd), and Hinata (whose birthday is December 27th). Therefore, the Rookie 9 must have all turned 12 in the year prior to their graduation, meaning Sakura is among the older ones, not the younger ones.

This is Databook 1 stuff we're talking about here, and there was a 12 year gap between the releases of Databooks 1 and 4. You'd think that if there was a mistake somewhere with the character ages, Kishimoto and Jump would fix it, but they didn't because there was no mistake, and the databooks and manga remained consistent in that regard.

https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku/status/1419079683136708611

When and where Gaara said that

Gaara has never said anything of the sort. I bet they are misinterpreting how Gaara in his novel said medical ninja are a rarity on the front lines cause their Taijutsu can't compare to other ninja and saying Sakura was a rare exception to the rule.

big sakura account (uchihassasusaku) on twitter: minds her own business, creates posts and threads about sakura and ss, blocks antis and ignores them, stays away from toxic sakura stans

naruto fandom: !!look at her so insecure always making everything about sakura!! so obsessed!

big hinata account (peachimom) on twitter: friends with harassers of sakura/ss fandom, post bait tweets about sakura, accuses minors and instigates drama w the sakura/ss fandom, blocks and stalks sakura stans and tweets about them

naruto fandom: kween shit!! we love u kween stay unbothered !! sunshine family the best !!

ME AGIAN ASKING FOR SOMEBODY TO REDRAW SAKURA PARENTS BECAUSE THERE NO WAY THIS

CREDIT TO SASUKE RETSUDEN MANGA!!❀ ◓

@uchihassasusaku

@uchihassasusaku

And

Rumi

@Gxagle

For this collage on twitter.

This beauty

Sasuke’s Brazilian VA’s recorded a special audio for Sakura’s Birthday. He calls her the sunshine in spring, the flowers blooming at the end of winter, his love. 💘

source: kumode & uchihassasusaku

GUYS!!!! GO AND REPLY TO THIS NEW OFFICIAL TWEET OF DIRECTOR OF BORUTO ABOUT ANIMATING SASUKE RETSUDEN IN TWITTER.

(LINK PROVIDED BELOW)

*Shonen Jump Twitter released its most popular novel list and Sasuke Retsuden was in it.*

And the DIRECTOR of Boruto asked a fan which scenes of Retsuden do we want to be animated.

I have provided the link. Go and ATTACK!!! 😂😂

Increase the no. of replies, retweets and likes.

Who knows they might actually animate it. 😂

SASUKE RETSUDEN HITS 3.5 MILLION VIEWS ON SHONEN JUMP JAPAN THIS IS CRAZY!!!

Link to read the chs!! (Manga+ app or website!!)

SASUKE RETSUDEN MANGA CH 3 IS OUT‼️‼️

READ IT FOR FREE WITH THIS LINK

Not really Maddy , Sakura Stans are always the ones saying they ship sasusaku , then multishipping her with everyone with a pair of balls , not only that , they get mad at sasuke ships with hinata and karin , the way they talk about karin is disgusting

A popular sasusaku stan account "uchihassasusaku" made a joke about how

"Naruto and sakura have sleepovers in the office " and the comment section was filled with their hentais , this was a hardcore "sasusaku " stan. Imagine if someone even mentions karin or talk about how sarda looks like karin or karin shares a platonic friendship with sasuke , they will GO nuts and prove Sakura and Naruto are best friends and have sleepovers and their bonds are deeper than husband and wife .

Not only that they get soooo mad at sasuke 's ships and claim he was in love with her forever , acting like he treated karin very badly , but he also treated Sakura very badly and sasuke didn't love her forever , he liked her after 699.

They are not ss shippers they are Sakura self inserts and sasusaku fandom is infested now with Stans who don't give a shit about sasuke

A lot of sasuke Stans Obviously who liked sasusaku at first , stopped liking this fandom and ship .

That Sakura stan talking shit about sasuke Stans is just lying to you because even you know how weird her Stans are. They even hate sarada cause of the karin mother claims

These are just narusaku Stans who turned into sasusaku after the ships became final . They make and retweet edits of Sakura hitting sasuke and make narusaku cheating jokes . Hate on naruhina ,

Ik naruhina Stans aren't saints , but trust me , these people are the problem, naruhina Stans would most probably support Sakura if they did the same .

Sakura Stans are always the ones saying they ship sasusaku , then multishipping her with everyone with a pair of balls , not only that , they get mad at sasuke ships with hinata and karin , the way they talk about karin is disgusting

I agree with that 100%, I've called out many Sakura stans and people calling themselves "SS fans" for that very reason, but the Anon I had responded to made it clear that they were referring to Sakura stans who did not ship SS. Or at least, didn't pretend to ship it.

Hi friends!!! I’m @uchihassasusaku on Twitter I decided to make a tumblr in case twitter shuts down bc #sasusaku

Link to my twitter ⬇️

https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku?s=21&t=zfIyFzii9lYyswlzkfP_Cw

DONT FORGET TO READ SASUKE RETSUDEN ON MANGA+‼️

Hello Madara, Last year you got a few asks telling you that Ino and Shino are jonins and I explained the contents of the settei here https://at.tumblr.com/madara-fate/about-the-ino-is-a-jonin-madara-hi-by-the-way-i/2xuttbamw0a2

It has already been debunked officially. The screenshot comes from a Russian tv program that interviewed SP. They also claimed that Tenten and Rock Lee were divorced.

https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku/status/1335695801960583168

Both Shino Aburame and Ino Yamanaka are chunin rank shinobi.

Yeah I never believed that Ino and Shino were Jonins in the first place, because as far as I'm concerned, information that isn't made readily available to the public, is not reliable information. Which is why I'll also not believe that Rock Lee and Tenten are divorced, because nowhere does it say that in any canon material.

Do you remember that

https://at.tumblr.com/narhinafan/what-do-you-sai-about-that-for-the-record-rei-is/qafgbjr30135

https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku/status/1345998873811181568?t=0uWRVLT13Zx7H15EUW7J2w&s=19

https://twitter.com/naruhinaluvrx/status/1346118090682208256?t=ZIAI6Zo6SI-POnjy7Y8Ajw&s=19

Also, according to what Kishimoto mentioned in an interview in 2010, he said that Hinata has more heroism than Sakura, and the issue of Hinata's love for Naruto has nothing to do with this because Kishi did not say that and even on the way to b he would not say that the reason is Hinata's love for Naruto . Fanfan is also a fan of Sasusaku himself, who admitted this

Plus, there's an interview where Kishi said he won't write Sakura as a heroine

Yeah you know what is ironic cause if Hinata being the heroine cause she is Naruto's love interest would have made it clear that NaruHina was going to happen since then so NaruSaku have no right to complain about the ending that came four years later. It funny how the very translate that did those admits they were bias cause of their ship, good to know they had a chance of heart though.

I know the interview you are on about the cinema today one.

Really Hinata has always had more of heroine vibe back since her Neji fight and her proud failure speech only cemented that. Then the Pain fight and war just made it clear she was the heroine.

https://twitter.com/uchihassasusaku/status/1721677482510749830

Sakura fans are fools boruto is not spin off and ritsuden is not canon

Yeah Boruto is a sequel not a spin off. And as you said Retsuden can't be considered canon with how much it contradicts it.