SARAH POLLEY
Best Adapted Screenplay, “Women Talking”
95th Annual Academy Awards
March 12, 2023
610 notes
·
View notes
This costume was probably created for the 2008 television miniseries John Adams, where it was worn by Sarah Polley as Abigail Adams Smith. It was reused in 2016’s Love & Friendship on Morfydd Clark as Frederica Vernon.
Costume Credit: Cecil
Follow: Website | Twitter | Facebook | Pinterest | Instagram
247 notes
·
View notes
Women Talking (2022)
965 notes
·
View notes
"It's been amazing to have this evidence that we didn't sabotage the movie by creating a more humane working environment. It helps me make that case. People say, 'We don't need to reinvent the wheel.' Actually, most of the time, you do."
-- Women Talking director Sarah Polley, on the film’s awards success. Due to its traumatic content, Polley implemented regular breaks, an on-set therapist, and 10-hr days (6 fewer than a typical Hollywood shoot day). [People, 3/13/23]
435 notes
·
View notes
tw: rape
gyns I wanna be clear that I’m not out here to hate on Women Talking because it was a really really really great film and I love Sarah Polley and wish her nothing but the best. And even though I was confused by Toews’ choice to make so much of the book about August, I still love her writing and enjoyed the book. and I really think y’all would really like the movie and the book and you should definitely go see it if you have the chance
but we gotta talk what happens to Nettie/Melvin in the film adaptation!!
breif overview of the concept: Women Talking is loosely inspired by the events of the Manitoba Mennonite Colony in Bolivia - women were repeatedly drugged and raped in the night. they were told that they were making it up or that they’d been attacked by the devil as punishment but in reality it was the men of the colony. this happened between 2005 and 2009 but probably continued even after the men were caught and arrested
so in the book Nettie is attacked and she is impregnated and later loses her child. this is obviously traumatic. she changes her name to Melvin and begins dressing as a man. (obviously because she’s living in a traditional mennonite colony, she can never fully take on the role of a man - her job becomes caring for the children) it is very clear in the book that this (as well as her no longer speaking to adults) is a trauma response and Toews refers to this character as Nettie, Nettie/Melvin, and Melvin but settles on Melvin at the end though she ALWAYS calls Melvin ‘she’
the movie however, within like thirty seconds of introducing Nettie/Melvin the film explicitly says (via narration. like when I say explicit, I mean explicit!) that Melvin is not living as a man as a result of trauma. It was something along the lines of “Melvin was a man all along. He just couldn’t hide it any more after it happened.” So instead, being raped and losing a child act as catalyst events that make Melvin’s life as a woman untenable
and I just hate that they’ve taken the easy way out with this! it’s so much more interesting and truthful (!) to be like this character is living in an overtly hierarchical, misogynist society and on top of that she experiences a series of distinctly sex-based trauma in addition to living amongst this growing collective trauma that the women are experiencing and so she attempts to live as a man for her safety! like how can you not see that that is what’s happening
252 notes
·
View notes
Women Talking (2022)
327 notes
·
View notes
Sarah Polley
22 notes
·
View notes