Tumgik
#saint jerome
illustratus · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
(Details) Saint Jerome and Saint Catherine of Alexandria
Unknown artist from Bruges or Brussels, ca. 1480-90
7K notes · View notes
Text
The Bible is a Catholic book I am very sorry to have to be the one to tell you this
332 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Jusepe de Ribera (Spanish, 1591-1652) Saint Jerome and the Angel of Judgement, 1626 National Museum of Capodimonte
216 notes · View notes
koredzas · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Nicolas Frances - Saint Jerome Translates the Gospels. Detail. 1450
116 notes · View notes
apenitentialprayer · 9 months
Text
Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ.
Saint Jerome, Prologue to his Commentary on Isaiah.
If you want Jesus without the Bible, you end up getting neither.
Mike Winger
126 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Madonna mit Kind, dem heiligen Hieronymus, dem heiligen Bernhardin und Engeln, um 14601470. von Sano di Pietro (Undatiert, )
47 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
‘Saint Jerome in Meditation’ by Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, c. 1606.
124 notes · View notes
canterai · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Antonello da Messina, details of San Girolamo nello studio; 1474, oil on lime, 45,7x36,2 cm, Londra, National Gallery
25 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Saint Jerome by Caravaggio, 1605-1606.
57 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
I was going to say it’s nice to see that even as late as the 15th century we’re still getting the undying motif of the sad lion, but I enlarged this painting so you could really see St. Jerome removing the thorn from the lion’s paw and
Tumblr media
This lion isn’t just sad, he’s traumatized. 
[ID: Two images; top image is a painting of St. Jerome removing a thorn from the lion’s paw in a portico of a church; the painting advances narratively to the right, where it shows the lion returning a donkey and two camels laden with goods after the donkey was stolen by thieves. Bottom image is a detail close-up of Jerome and the lion; the lion is drawn rather figuratively, with a massive mane of hair, a frowning mouth, and huge staring eyes.]
56 notes · View notes
Text
SAINT OF THE DAY (March 22)
Tumblr media
March 22 is the liturgical memorial of Saint Lea of Rome, a fourth-century widow who left her wealth behind, entered consecrated life, and attained great holiness through asceticism and prayer.
Though not well-known as a figure of devotion in modern times, she was acknowledged as a saint on the testimony of her contemporary Saint Jerome, who wrote a brief description of Lea's life after she had died.
Jerome, a scholarly monk best known for his Latin translation of the Bible (the Vulgate), is the Church's only source of information on St. Lea, whose biographical details are unknown.
St. Jerome eulogized her in a letter written during the year 384 to his student and spiritual directee Marcella, another Roman consecrated woman who had left her aristocratic life behind after being widowed.
It is clear from his letter that Lea was a mutual friend to both Jerome and Marcella.
Jerome states that his account is written to “hail with joy the release of a soul, which has trampled Satan under foot, and won for itself, at last, a crown of tranquility.”
Jerome also contrasts the life of “our most saintly friend” with that of the late pagan public official, Praetextatus, held up by Jerome as a cautionary example.
“Who,” Jerome begins, “can sufficiently eulogize our dear Lea's mode of living? So complete was her conversion to the Lord that, becoming the head of a monastery, she showed herself a true mother to the virgins in it, wore coarse sackcloth instead of soft raiment, passed sleepless nights in prayer, and instructed her companions even more by example than by precept.”
Jerome describes how Lea, in her great humility, “was accounted the servant of all … She was careless of her dress, neglected her hair, and ate only the coarsest food. Still, in all that she did, she avoided ostentation that she might not have her reward in this world.”
Jerome's letter goes on to compare her fate to that of Praetextus – who died in the same year as Lea, after spending his life promoting a return to Rome's ancient polytheistic pagan religion.
The monk retells Jesus' parable of Lazarus and Dives, with Lea in the place of the poor and suffering man.
Lea, Jerome says, is “welcomed into the choirs of the angels; she is comforted in Abraham's bosom.
And, as once the beggar Lazarus saw the rich man, for all his purple, lying in torment, so does Lea see the consul, not now in his triumphal robe but clothed in mourning, and asking for a drop of water from her little finger.”
Thus Lea, “who seemed poor and of little worth, and whose life was accounted madness,” triumphs in salvation.
But the punishment of infidelity falls on the consul-elect — who had led a triumphant procession just before his death and had been widely mourned afterward.
Jerome ends his letter by urging Marcella to remember the lesson of St. Lea's life:
“We must not allow … money to weigh us down, or lean upon the staff of worldly power. We must not seek to possess both Christ and the world.
No; things eternal must take the place of things transitory; and since, physically speaking, we daily anticipate death, if we wish for immortality we must realize that we are but mortal.”
6 notes · View notes
Text
Just remember, we think of the fruit in the garden because of Saint Jerome’s wild and uninhibited love of puns
16 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Alonso Cano (Spanish, 1601-1667) The penitent Saint Jerome, ca.1660 Museo Nacional del Prado
70 notes · View notes
koredzas · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Bartolomeo della Gatta - Saint Jerome. 1492 - 1493
59 notes · View notes
apenitentialprayer · 4 months
Note
two silly questions for your scholarly mind, if it pleases firstly: do you think it is more likely that Paul was married but separated or widowed, or that Paul never married? and secondly: based on what we know of Paul's life, what do you think was the thorn in Paul's side that he mentions in 2 Corinthians 12?
I'm going to start with the second question, because this was something that had interested me. The Church Fathers seem split as to whether the "thorn in [Paul's] flesh" refers to a disability (Anselm of Canterbury, Bede the Venerable, Jerome), a serious temptation of some kind (Hugh of Saint-Cher), or the persecutions he faced on behalf of the Gospel (John Chrysostom, Ambrose of Milan, Theophylact of Ohrid).
I don't really have a strong argument for one of these possibilities over the other, but I will say that emotionally, I have an attachment to the disability interpretation; my "born again" moment roughly coincided with my own diagnosis of a chronic auto-immune disease, and so I often read 2 Corinthians 12:9-10 through the lens of my illness.
As for whether Paul was married, I don't know. It was normative for Pharisees, and is normative for Rabbis, to be married; while it was not universally required, there were at least some times and places where ordination would not be granted to unmarried men, studying certain forms of theology was limited to married men, and membership in the Sanhedrin required one to be married. Given Paul's adherence to the Law and his being "a zealot for [his] ancestral traditions," (Galatians 1:14) it would make sense that he was married. I don't know, though.
7 notes · View notes
cmonbartender · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
St Jerome and the Lion - Scott Gustafson
5 notes · View notes