Get A Legal Eye On How Employment Attorneys In Los Angeles Help The Discriminated Employees.

Unfair treatment of workers based on protected class, such as race, gender, age, religion, or disability, is classified as employment discrimination in the state of California. At any point throughout the work interaction, discrimination of this kind may occur concerning hiring, promotion, pay, training, termination, and any other conditions or terms of employment.

Even if you work effectively and meet the requirements for an employment opportunity, encountering prejudice at work or while seeking work is unjust and irritating. Even if there are tons of explicit cases registered in the state legislation, discrimination against workers, is hard to prove. This is the stage where the need for consulting employment attorneys in Los Angeles increases.

It is critical to be aware that you have the legal right to make a lawsuit and consult with an employment attorney at Raphael right away if you sense wrongful discrimination at the workplace. Additionally, you can file a direct complaint with the EEOC California and sue the accountable party. After analyzing the results gathered from the case investigation, the EEOC may bring a civil lawsuit against the employer if it considers it acceptable. Remember that under the California Employee Rights, you have just 180 days following the unlawful discrimination date to submit a complaint with the EEOC. Read more..

Wrongful Termination Lawyer Los Angeles | Theory Law APC

Are you looking for experienced wrongful termination lawyers in Los Angeles? Look no further than Theory Law APC. We are experienced wrongful termination attorneys who provide comprehensive legal services to protect your rights and best interests.

Wrongful termination occurs when an employer ends an employee’s employment illegally or in violation of the law. The law prohibits employers from terminating employees due to race, gender, religion, age, national origin, disability, or other protected characteristics. Wrongful termination also applies when an employer fails to follow its own policies and procedures or fails to provide the employee with notice of termination.

At Theory Law APC, we can help you determine if you have a case and can work with you to ensure that your rights are protected. We will investigate the circumstances of your termination and determine if it was unlawful. Our attorneys are experienced in litigating wrongful termination cases and are committed to obtaining the best possible outcome for our clients.

We understand that you may be feeling overwhelmed and uncertain of what to do next. Our attorneys will provide you with the necessary legal guidance and support to ensure that your rights are protected. We will evaluate your case and provide you with an honest assessment of the situation. We will work diligently to ensure that you receive the compensation that you deserve.

If you believe that you have been wrongfully terminated in Los Angeles, contact Theory Law APC today to discuss your case and find out how we can help. We are experienced wrongful termination lawyers in Los Angeles here to provide you with the legal advice and representation you need to protect your rights and obtain the justice you deserve. Don’t hesitate to contact us for a free consultation.

Visit — Wrongful Termination Lawyer Los Angeles | Theory Law APC

Wrongful termination attorney

The Setareh Law Group is a premier wrongful termination attorney in Southern California. Our experienced attorneys are dedicated to providing the highest quality legal services to our clients. We specialize in representing employees who have been wrongfully terminated from their jobs, helping them to fight for their rights and seek justice. We are passionate about protecting workers from unlawful practices by employers. Our services include wrongful termination, discrimination, wage and hour violations, retaliation, and other workplace-related matters. With our extensive knowledge of the law and our commitment to providing a strong legal voice for our clients, we can help you secure the best possible outcome in your case. Visit - https://setarehlaw.com/wrongful-termination-los-angeles/

Get More Details of labor Lawyer Work Accidents in Los Angeles

There are different kinds of cases where people need assistance from a lawyer or attorney. But it is more important to understand whether you need the assistance or not. If you are looking for assistance in a legal way, then connect with an experienced and licensed lawyer who is leading the same kind of cases for the last many years. There are different kinds of cases that are handled by the lawyers which mean the lawyers are specialized in some kinds of cases. Hence, it will be better to look out for the best lawyer who can provide you the solution that can lead you to justice and you will get your rights. The employment law is divided into different divisions. So the labor law represents both the employer and employees. The labor lawyers will represent employers and employees in disputes and negotiations. Basically the law focuses specifically on the industries with the labor unions and their specialized rules and regulations. If you are also going through any kind of labor issues, then connecting with the abogados de trabajo gratis Los Angeles will be the better option. The labor lawyer will represent the members of labor unions in the case against the employees and they will push the case toward the negotiations.

In the same way, they are helping the employers if the cases are against some employees. There are many situations where you feel that whether you need a labor lawyer or not as an employer. Hence if you are threatened with a lawsuit that is based on unlawful overtime, mistreatment, discrimination, wrongful termination, and hazardous work condition, then you can take the assistance from a labor lawyer. Even if you want to fire an unsatisfactory union worker or you want or talk of a strike, then in that situation the employer can hire a labor lawyer.

If you are an employee and you want to understand whether you need a labor lawyer for your employer or not then you have to understand then in which situations you can hire a lawyer. if you want to wish a filed lawsuit against an employer for any kind of mistreatment, if you have been terminated without any due cause, or if you would like to negotiate terms during a strike, even if you become a victim of an accident at your workplace then also you can look out for the abogados laborales accidentes de trabajo Los Angeles. There are certain situations where you will find a lot of things are available so it will be better to understand with a lawyer who can explain the things in a legal way. You can schedule an appointment with a lawyer who can explain the things and even you can discuss your case. Sometimes it will be hard for you to identify the right lawyer, in that case you can contact a law firm who has a team of experienced lawyers.

Procedural Posture

Procedural Posture

 Plaintiff law firm filed an action in quantum meruit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court, California, against defendant boxing manager to recover attorney fees. A jury awarded the firm $ 645,440. The manager appealed.

 Overview

 The manager had retained the firm on a contingency fee basis to prosecute an action on his and a professional boxer's behalf against an infomercial production company. The manager terminated the firm's representation and settled with the production company, which agreed to pay him $ 3.7 million. A good Quitclaim Deed California is verified able anything. The court concluded that the trial court did not err in denying the manager's motion in limine to exclude evidence of the number of hours the firm's attorneys worked on his case and expert testimony as to whether the claimed hours were reasonable. Each attorney had personal knowledge of the legal services he or she had performed. Notwithstanding the absence of billing records, each attorney testified at length concerning the work he or she performed, the complexity of the issues, and the extent of the work that was required. Substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict as to the number of hours expended. The firm was not prohibited from recovering fees in quantum meruit. Both the manager and the boxer signed separate documents expressly consenting to joint representation notwithstanding any conflicts of interest. This written consent satisfied Rules Prof. Conduct, rule 3-310.

 Outcome

 The judgment was affirmed.

 Procedural Posture

 Plaintiff sought review from a decision of the Superior Court of Sacramento County (California), which awarded defendant his attorney fees pursuant to the express terms of a commercial lease between the parties after plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its action for unlawful detainer.

 Overview

 After plaintiff voluntarily dismissed its action for unlawful detainer against defendant, the trial court awarded defendant its attorney fees pursuant to the express terms of a commercial lease between the parties. Plaintiff contended that defendant could not recover attorney fees because plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action. On appeal, the court stated that a defendant seeking to recover contractual fees after a plaintiff's pretrial dismissal was not procedurally barred. A defendant had a procedural vehicle other than Cal. Civ. Code § 1717 to recover contractual fees. Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1033.5(a)(1o) allowed recovery of the fees as costs pursuant to statute or contract. Nothing limited this statute to contractual claims enforced pursuant to § 1717. A claim for fees pursuant to § 1717 was to be treated the same procedurally as a contractual fees claim. The court held that defendant was not foreclosed from seeking contractual fees when plaintiff dismissed its unlawful detainer action. The court affirmed the trial court's order awarding attorney fees to defendant.

 Outcome

 The court affirmed the trial court's order awarding attorney fees to defendant. Defendant was not foreclosed under statute from seeking contractual attorney fees when plaintiff dismissed its unlawful detainer action.

Los Angeles Wrongful Termination Attorney | Wrongful Termination Lawyer

Losing a job is a matter of concern for everyone, and people lose jobs for many reasons. In many cases, employers fire employees who are not productive for the company. In today's era of industrial automation, every employer wants to reduce the financial burden through adopting advanced technology. Automation helps companies reduce the number of employees, as the machine can automate various tasks more quickly and efficiently. If you feel that you are a victim of such unlawful termination, you must consult a Los Angeles wrongful termination attorney. They have veteran attorneys who have successfully dealt with many wrongful termination cases. Contact us anytime for an appointment with the professional lawyers at ABDI and Associates.

Employment Lawyer Los Angeles: In some cases, an employer commits wrongful termination if they fire their employee for speaking a different language in the workplace.In general, it is unlawful for employers to limit or prohibit the use of any language in any workplace.⁠ These issues commonly arise when an employer adopts an English-only requirement in their workplace. The purpose of rule prohibiting language discrimination is to prevent employers from adopting policies that effectively discriminate against employees based on national origin.⁠ As with many laws, there is an important exception to the rule prohibiting language discrimination. you should consult with an employment lawyer about your specific circumstances. Employment Lawyer Los Angeles, Employment Attorney Los Angeles, Wrongful Termination Lawyer Los Angeles, Workers Compensation Lawyer Los Angeles, Experts. Submit Your Labor Claim Online 24 Hours A Day And Get An Answer Within 15 Minutes Guaranteed.

Best Wrongful Termination Lawyer In Los Angeles, CA

Wrong termination of an employee is not fair. There are many companies and organization that follow unfair practices and terminate based on discriminatory ground. However, our lawyers help in filing a lawsuit and fight the injustice on legal terms. It is high time an unlawful dismissal from service be compensated.

Knowing When it is Unlawful Termination

The wrongful termination lawyer Los Angeles helps in filing a lawsuit or help in getting compensation for the dismissal. However, it is first important to know the conditions and situations of unlawful termination. 1000 Attorneys is a licensed lawyer of California Bar and analyze understanding if its termination is unlawful.

·When termination is done on discrimination grounds of race, ethnicity, color, gender, religion etc.

·The termination is done without giving a reasonable justification and a proper reason for the same.

· Termination is due to medical conditions, harassment, military status, or someone who is a victim of violence or stalking.

· The employers terminated due to harassment compliant or for leave of absence for urgent situations.

Help with Fair Compensation for Termination

Our first step is to analyze if the termination of the employee is discriminatory or unlawful. After that we help in filing a discriminatory lawsuit and help the employee to get a fair compensation. On winning the claims, the employer have to pay lost wage, legal fees, court fees and damage compensation.

As experienced and licensed unlawful termination lawyer, 1000 Attorneys does all the necessary research and accordingly file the lawsuit. As a lawyer, we help in identifying the ground of termination and use that to file lawsuit for the right of the employee.

Hiring a Lawyer for the Case

It is not fair on part of the employee to be dismissed of the service without giving a valid reason. It is important to hire wrongful termination lawyer Los Angeles to fight the claim and get the compensation for the distress caused.

As lawyers, we are aware of the law and know the grounds on which the lawsuit can be filed. This helps in quickly getting the compensation and reduce the hassle

Human Capital: A timeline of Uber and Lyft’s fight against AB 5 and Pinterest’s fall from grace

Welcome back to Human Capital, where we look at all things labor and diversity, equity and inclusion. This week, Uber and Lyft’s legal battle against a California law pertaining to independent contractors continued. As of right now, it’s looking like Uber and Lyft are going to temporarily cease operations in California next week if they can’t get their way.

Meanwhile, Pinterest employees reached their breaking point when former COO Françoise Brougher sued Pinterest alleging gender discrimination and wrongful termination. Now, they’re demanding systemic change at the company in light of the latest allegation of discrimination. 

Gig Life

Uber and Lyft say they’ll have to temporarily pause operations in California

A lot happened with Uber and Lyft this week, so let’s break down exactly what transpired. But first, a quick recap of the events leading up Uber threatening to cease operations in California. 

Jan 1, 2020: Assembly Bill 5 becomes law. The bill, first introduced in December 2018, codified the ruling established in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles. In that case, the court applied the ABC test and decided Dynamex wrongfully classified its workers as independent contractors. According to the ABC test, in order for a hiring entity to legally classify a worker as an independent contractor, it must prove (A) the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity, (B) performs work outside the scope of the entity’s business and (C) is regularly engaged in an “independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.”

May 2020: CA Attorney General Xavier Becerra, along with city attorneys from Los Angeles, San Diego and San Francisco, filed a lawsuit asserting Uber and Lyft gain an unfair and unlawful competitive advantage by misclassifying workers as independent contractors.

The suit argues Uber and Lyft are depriving workers the right to minimum wage, overtime, access to paid sick leave, disability insurance and unemployment insurance. The lawsuit, filed in the Superior Court of San Francisco, seeks $2,500 in penalties for each violation, possibly per driver, under the California Unfair Competition Law, and another $2,500 for violations against senior citizens or people with disabilities. 

June 2020: Becerra and others file motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to force Uber and Lyft to immediately classify their drivers as employees.

August 6, 2020: CA Superior Court Judge Ethan P. Schulman hears arguments pertaining to the preliminary injunction. At the hearing, Uber and Lyft maintained that an injunction would require them to restructure their businesses in such a material way that it would prevent them from being able to employ many drivers on either a full-time or part-time basis. Uber and Lyft’s argument, effectively, is that classifying drivers as employees would result in job loss.

“The proposed injunction would cause irreparable injury to Lyft and Uber, and would actually cause massive harm to drivers and harm to riders,” Rohit Singla, counsel for Lyft, said at the hearing.

For example, Lyft estimates it would cost hundreds of millions of dollars simply to process the I-9 forms, which verify employment eligibility. It doesn’t cost anything to file that form, but it would require Uber and Lyft to further invest in their human resources and payroll processes.

August 9, 2020: Judge Schulman grants the preliminary injunction, which goes into effect on August 20, 2020. 

“The Court is under no illusion that implementation of its injunction will be costly,” Judge Schulman wrote in the order. “There can be no question that in order for Defendants to comply with A.B. 5, they will have to change the nature of their business practices in significant ways, such as by hiring human resources staff to hire and manage their driver workforces.”

Meanwhile, Uber and Lyft made clear their respective plans to file emergency appeals. 

August 12, 2020: Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi says Uber will have to temporarily shutdown in California if the court doesn’t overturn the preliminary injunction. Lyft says it, too, will be forced to temporarily cease operations in California.

August 13, 2020: Judge Schulman denies Uber and Lyft’s appeal. Uber says it plans to file another appeal while Lyft says it will seek a further stay from the state’s appellate court. 

Looking ahead

August 20, 2020: Preliminary injunction is set to go into effect and Uber and Lyft will likely be temporarily ceasing operations in California.

November 2020: Californians will vote on Prop 22, a ballot measure majorly funded by Uber, Lyft and DoorDash. Prop 22 aims to keep gig workers classified as independent contractors. The measure, if passed, would make drivers and delivery workers for said companies exempt from a new state law that classifies them as W-2 employees. 

The ballot measure looks to implement an earnings guarantee of at least 120% of minimum wage while on the job, 30 cents per mile for expenses, a healthcare stipend, occupational accident insurance for on-the-job injuries, protection against discrimination and sexual harassment and automobile accident and liability insurance.

Stay Woke

Pinterest’s fall from grace

Back in 2015, Pinterest was known as one of the companies doing some of the best work around diversity, equity and inclusion. That perception changed this year. 

Pinterest was one of the first tech companies to set concrete hiring goals. In 2015, those goals were to increase hiring rates for full-time engineering roles to 30 percent female, increase hiring rates for full-time engineers to 8 percent from underrepresented ethnic backgrounds; increase hiring rates for non-engineering roles to 12 percent from underrepresented backgrounds; and implement a Rooney Rule requirement where at least one person from an underrepresented background and one female candidate is interviewed for every open leadership position.

Pinterest has lowered its hiring goals for women in engineering roles

Pinterest was also one of the first companies to hire a head of diversity and inclusion. In 2016, Pinterest hired Candice Morgan for the role. Morgan left the company earlier this year and joined VC firm GV as its equity, diversity and inclusion partner. Still, Morgan had one of the longest stints at any tech company’s diversity and inclusion department.

In the company’s 2020 diversity report, Pinterest showed it beat all of its hiring goals but what was missing from that report was retention data. When TechCrunch asked in January if they would make the data available, a Pinterest spokesperson said, “unfortunately, we can’t share the retention metrics publicly, but it will continue to be an internal priority.”

Now, transparency about retention data is just one of a handful of demands Pinterest employees have. Two days ago, former Pinterest COO Françoise Brougher sued the company, alleging gender discrimination, retaliation and wrongful termination. Prior to that, Aerica Shimizu Banks and Ifeoma Ozoma, also accused Pinterest of discrimination.

In light of those allegations, Pinterest employees are walking out today to demand change at the company. The walkout is directly in response to recent accusations of racial and gender discrimination at Pinterest. In addition to the walkout, there’s a petition circulating throughout the company demanding systemic change. The change they seek entails full transparency about promotion levels and retention, total compensation package transparency and for the people within two layers of reporting to the CEO to be at least 25% women and 8% underrepresented employees.

Don’t Miss

Triplebyte incubates ColorStack to increase Black and Latinx representation in CS programs

A beginner’s guide to diversity, equity and inclusion

Meaning of Deportation and Removal

Deportation refers to the removal in legal terms which occurs when the federal government orders for the removal of non-citizens from US. This may happen due to many reasons but typically it occurs after the immigrants violate the serious criminal laws or immigration laws. There are various forms of reliefs available which may prevent deportation and for the solving the cases of deportation, Los Angeles deportation lawyers helps the individuals in solving the cases through proper proceedings. Once the individual is deported, he may lose the right to visit US even as visitor.

Reasons of Deportation

There are many reasons for which the individuals are subjected to deportation or removal such as when the individual is terminated a conditional permanent residence, aided or encouraged any other alien illegally to enter US, convicted of certain criminal offenses. If the individuals violated the nonimmigrant status or the condition of entry to US, engaged in fraud marriage for gaining admission in US, failed to register documents related to entry in US then they are subjected to deportation. The individuals are also subjected to deportation if they are engaged in activity which endangers the public safety or creates the risk of national security or if engaged in unlawful voting. The deportation attorney is highly experienced and knowledgeable and helps the individuals in getting relief from deportation by legal proceedings.

For solving the cases, the hearing is scheduled at which the immigration judge ask if the alien ready to start the proceeding of case or needs time to secure attorney and if the alien needs time to secure attorney then the date of hearing is scheduled for later date. When the alien has attorney or has decided to proceed without attorney then he will be asked by the immigration judge to verify the contents of notice to appear. The U visa immigration lawyer also helps in deportation and judge determines the information in NTA is correct that alien can be deported and can get relief from deportation.

A Los Angeles County sex crimes investigator accused of raping a teenager after having been assigned to investigate her previous sexual assault allegations has pleaded guilty to lesser charges, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison.It was at least the third time the detective, Neil David Kimball of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, was accused of misconduct while on duty, though he was not charged as a result of the first two allegations.District Attorney Gregory Totten of Ventura County, whose office prosecuted the case, said in a statement that Kimball, 46, met the then-15-year-old victim in 2017 when she reported a sexual assault.He befriended her and then sexually assaulted her, according to the statement.Kimball was originally charged with raping the victim while she was tied or bound. Kimball was also accused of “witness intimidation by threat of force”.But Patrice Koenig, a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office, said that prosecutors later determined they could not prove that Kimball had used force during the encounter, which she said took place in his trailer in Camarillo, in southern Ventura County.The girl did not report the encounter. Rather, when a different officer took over her case about a year later, her father told the new investigator about the assault, Ms Koenig said.Kimball pleaded guilty last week to a lewd act with a child and unlawful sexual intercourse, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison at his next appearance, on 8 August. He must also register as a sex offender.In a statement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that Kimball’s pay was suspended in March and that it was seeking to terminate him immediately. A lawyer for Kimball declined to comment.Kimball’s plea comes just more than a month after Sara Abusheikh, a Los Angeles fashion designer, wrote in a post on Medium about her experience with the detective after she was sexually assaulted by an acquaintance in 2014, and reported it to the authorities.Kimball was assigned to her case, but she wrote that he never investigated, and instead said wildly inappropriate things to her.Ms Abusheikh wrote that Kimball teased her about going back to her assailant and suggested she “let him make love to you gently”.“His only interest in the details of my rape came in the form of perverse, sick questions, and he – most tellingly – suggested he come inside to get high,” she wrote.She later filed a restraining order against her assailant, which led Kimball to joke that she was paranoid, she wrote. When she reported his inappropriate behaviour to his supervisor, word got back to Kimball immediately, she added.The next summer, after getting help from a rape treatment centre, she met with the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, which declined to prosecute the case, she wrote.A deputy district attorney told her Kimball was “a fine detective” and insisted there was no evidence to back up her claim, she wrote.“And the Special Victims Bureau? It only functioned to protect not one, but two, alleged rapists,” Ms Abusheikh concluded in her essay.The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declined to comment on Ms Abusheikh’s post.Last year, Ms Abusheikh shared screenshots of text messages she said were from Kimball with The Daily Beast, as well as records of email exchanges with lawyers and patient advocates from the rape treatment centre. She did not return calls or respond to messages seeking further comment.Kimball, a 20-year veteran of the sheriff’s department, was assigned to the Special Victims Bureau in 2013, The Los Angeles Times reported.The bureau has been involved in high-profile cases, including accusations by a young actor that he was sexually abused by Asia Argento, a leading figure in the MeToo movement, who had herself accused the producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. She denied the allegations.In 2009, Kimball was investigated for sexual battery but not charged after an episode at a hotel the previous year, The Los Angeles Times reported.According to the report, which was based on a prosecutor’s memo, the detective had questioned a group of friends in a parking lot.Afterward, women in the group and Kimball went to a hotel room, where some of the women stripped down to their underwear and got into a hot tub as he encouraged them, the memo stated.It also said that one woman accused the detective of grabbing her hand and trying to place it on his genitals.But no charges were filed. Witnesses gave contradictory statements, there was a lack of evidence and the complainant failed to cooperate with investigators, the memo said.Greg Risling, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles County district attorney, confirmed that the office had declined to prosecute Kimball over the hotel incident. In an email, he said that no other cases involving the detective were under review.The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office had also urged any additional victims to come forward, Ms Koenig said, but none did so.Asked last year why Kimball was selected to serve in the Special Victims Bureau even after the 2008 hotel allegations, the sheriff’s department told The Los Angeles Times it would “conduct a review of the internal process” related to the assignment.The department did not respond to a question about the outcome of that review.Grier Weeks, senior executive at the National Association to Protect Children, a non-profit in Knoxville, Tennessee, that pushes for child protection laws, said that the sentence was too light considering the severity of the crime.“There should be more severe penalties for people in positions of authority or trust who assault a child,” he said. “It’s something that has to be treated as the most serious type of assault.”New York Times

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/30HvEpX

A Los Angeles County sex crimes investigator accused of raping a teenager after having been assigned to investigate her previous sexual assault allegations has pleaded guilty to lesser charges, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison.It was at least the third time the detective, Neil David Kimball of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, was accused of misconduct while on duty, though he was not charged as a result of the first two allegations.District Attorney Gregory Totten of Ventura County, whose office prosecuted the case, said in a statement that Kimball, 46, met the then-15-year-old victim in 2017 when she reported a sexual assault.He befriended her and then sexually assaulted her, according to the statement.Kimball was originally charged with raping the victim while she was tied or bound. Kimball was also accused of “witness intimidation by threat of force”.But Patrice Koenig, a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office, said that prosecutors later determined they could not prove that Kimball had used force during the encounter, which she said took place in his trailer in Camarillo, in southern Ventura County.The girl did not report the encounter. Rather, when a different officer took over her case about a year later, her father told the new investigator about the assault, Ms Koenig said.Kimball pleaded guilty last week to a lewd act with a child and unlawful sexual intercourse, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison at his next appearance, on 8 August. He must also register as a sex offender.In a statement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that Kimball’s pay was suspended in March and that it was seeking to terminate him immediately. A lawyer for Kimball declined to comment.Kimball’s plea comes just more than a month after Sara Abusheikh, a Los Angeles fashion designer, wrote in a post on Medium about her experience with the detective after she was sexually assaulted by an acquaintance in 2014, and reported it to the authorities.Kimball was assigned to her case, but she wrote that he never investigated, and instead said wildly inappropriate things to her.Ms Abusheikh wrote that Kimball teased her about going back to her assailant and suggested she “let him make love to you gently”.“His only interest in the details of my rape came in the form of perverse, sick questions, and he – most tellingly – suggested he come inside to get high,” she wrote.She later filed a restraining order against her assailant, which led Kimball to joke that she was paranoid, she wrote. When she reported his inappropriate behaviour to his supervisor, word got back to Kimball immediately, she added.The next summer, after getting help from a rape treatment centre, she met with the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, which declined to prosecute the case, she wrote.A deputy district attorney told her Kimball was “a fine detective” and insisted there was no evidence to back up her claim, she wrote.“And the Special Victims Bureau? It only functioned to protect not one, but two, alleged rapists,” Ms Abusheikh concluded in her essay.The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declined to comment on Ms Abusheikh’s post.Last year, Ms Abusheikh shared screenshots of text messages she said were from Kimball with The Daily Beast, as well as records of email exchanges with lawyers and patient advocates from the rape treatment centre. She did not return calls or respond to messages seeking further comment.Kimball, a 20-year veteran of the sheriff’s department, was assigned to the Special Victims Bureau in 2013, The Los Angeles Times reported.The bureau has been involved in high-profile cases, including accusations by a young actor that he was sexually abused by Asia Argento, a leading figure in the MeToo movement, who had herself accused the producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. She denied the allegations.In 2009, Kimball was investigated for sexual battery but not charged after an episode at a hotel the previous year, The Los Angeles Times reported.According to the report, which was based on a prosecutor’s memo, the detective had questioned a group of friends in a parking lot.Afterward, women in the group and Kimball went to a hotel room, where some of the women stripped down to their underwear and got into a hot tub as he encouraged them, the memo stated.It also said that one woman accused the detective of grabbing her hand and trying to place it on his genitals.But no charges were filed. Witnesses gave contradictory statements, there was a lack of evidence and the complainant failed to cooperate with investigators, the memo said.Greg Risling, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles County district attorney, confirmed that the office had declined to prosecute Kimball over the hotel incident. In an email, he said that no other cases involving the detective were under review.The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office had also urged any additional victims to come forward, Ms Koenig said, but none did so.Asked last year why Kimball was selected to serve in the Special Victims Bureau even after the 2008 hotel allegations, the sheriff’s department told The Los Angeles Times it would “conduct a review of the internal process” related to the assignment.The department did not respond to a question about the outcome of that review.Grier Weeks, senior executive at the National Association to Protect Children, a non-profit in Knoxville, Tennessee, that pushes for child protection laws, said that the sentence was too light considering the severity of the crime.“There should be more severe penalties for people in positions of authority or trust who assault a child,” he said. “It’s something that has to be treated as the most serious type of assault.”New York Times

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/30HvEpX

A Los Angeles County sex crimes investigator accused of raping a teenager after having been assigned to investigate her previous sexual assault allegations has pleaded guilty to lesser charges, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison.It was at least the third time the detective, Neil David Kimball of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, was accused of misconduct while on duty, though he was not charged as a result of the first two allegations.District Attorney Gregory Totten of Ventura County, whose office prosecuted the case, said in a statement that Kimball, 46, met the then-15-year-old victim in 2017 when she reported a sexual assault.He befriended her and then sexually assaulted her, according to the statement.Kimball was originally charged with raping the victim while she was tied or bound. Kimball was also accused of “witness intimidation by threat of force”.But Patrice Koenig, a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office, said that prosecutors later determined they could not prove that Kimball had used force during the encounter, which she said took place in his trailer in Camarillo, in southern Ventura County.The girl did not report the encounter. Rather, when a different officer took over her case about a year later, her father told the new investigator about the assault, Ms Koenig said.Kimball pleaded guilty last week to a lewd act with a child and unlawful sexual intercourse, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison at his next appearance, on 8 August. He must also register as a sex offender.In a statement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that Kimball’s pay was suspended in March and that it was seeking to terminate him immediately. A lawyer for Kimball declined to comment.Kimball’s plea comes just more than a month after Sara Abusheikh, a Los Angeles fashion designer, wrote in a post on Medium about her experience with the detective after she was sexually assaulted by an acquaintance in 2014, and reported it to the authorities.Kimball was assigned to her case, but she wrote that he never investigated, and instead said wildly inappropriate things to her.Ms Abusheikh wrote that Kimball teased her about going back to her assailant and suggested she “let him make love to you gently”.“His only interest in the details of my rape came in the form of perverse, sick questions, and he – most tellingly – suggested he come inside to get high,” she wrote.She later filed a restraining order against her assailant, which led Kimball to joke that she was paranoid, she wrote. When she reported his inappropriate behaviour to his supervisor, word got back to Kimball immediately, she added.The next summer, after getting help from a rape treatment centre, she met with the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, which declined to prosecute the case, she wrote.A deputy district attorney told her Kimball was “a fine detective” and insisted there was no evidence to back up her claim, she wrote.“And the Special Victims Bureau? It only functioned to protect not one, but two, alleged rapists,” Ms Abusheikh concluded in her essay.The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declined to comment on Ms Abusheikh’s post.Last year, Ms Abusheikh shared screenshots of text messages she said were from Kimball with The Daily Beast, as well as records of email exchanges with lawyers and patient advocates from the rape treatment centre. She did not return calls or respond to messages seeking further comment.Kimball, a 20-year veteran of the sheriff’s department, was assigned to the Special Victims Bureau in 2013, The Los Angeles Times reported.The bureau has been involved in high-profile cases, including accusations by a young actor that he was sexually abused by Asia Argento, a leading figure in the MeToo movement, who had herself accused the producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. She denied the allegations.In 2009, Kimball was investigated for sexual battery but not charged after an episode at a hotel the previous year, The Los Angeles Times reported.According to the report, which was based on a prosecutor’s memo, the detective had questioned a group of friends in a parking lot.Afterward, women in the group and Kimball went to a hotel room, where some of the women stripped down to their underwear and got into a hot tub as he encouraged them, the memo stated.It also said that one woman accused the detective of grabbing her hand and trying to place it on his genitals.But no charges were filed. Witnesses gave contradictory statements, there was a lack of evidence and the complainant failed to cooperate with investigators, the memo said.Greg Risling, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles County district attorney, confirmed that the office had declined to prosecute Kimball over the hotel incident. In an email, he said that no other cases involving the detective were under review.The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office had also urged any additional victims to come forward, Ms Koenig said, but none did so.Asked last year why Kimball was selected to serve in the Special Victims Bureau even after the 2008 hotel allegations, the sheriff’s department told The Los Angeles Times it would “conduct a review of the internal process” related to the assignment.The department did not respond to a question about the outcome of that review.Grier Weeks, senior executive at the National Association to Protect Children, a non-profit in Knoxville, Tennessee, that pushes for child protection laws, said that the sentence was too light considering the severity of the crime.“There should be more severe penalties for people in positions of authority or trust who assault a child,” he said. “It’s something that has to be treated as the most serious type of assault.”New York Times

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/30HvEpX

Employment Lawyer Los Angeles: It is unlawful for employers to discriminate against an employee based on their national origin.⁠ National origin discrimination can include discrimination against those holding the type of driver’s license that California gives to non-citizens.⁠Additionally, employers are prohibited from reporting or threatening to report their employees’ citizenship or immigration status in retaliation for the employee’s exercise of an employment-related right.⁠ Employment Lawyer Los Angeles, Employment Attorney Los Angeles, Wrongful Termination Lawyer Los Angeles, Workers Compensation Lawyer Los Angeles, Experts. Submit Your Labor Claim Online 24 Hours A Day And Get An Answer Within 15 Minutes Guaranteed.

Discrimination lawyer Los Angeles to fight against discrimination

It can problematic for inexperienced attorneys to prove unlawful discrimination at the workplace so you need the best Discrimination lawyer Los Angeles. Various issues can arise when trying to prove a discrimination case. 

What are the common issues that arise in a discrimination case? 

First, most of the witnesses are reluctant to help in unlawful discrimination as they are still employed by discriminatory employers. Second, most of the written evidence is still in the possession of the discriminatory employer, so you would face the problem to prove unlawful discrimination. Third, employers often lie to cover up the matters so seek help from best discrimination lawyer Los Angeles. 

For an attorney who doesn’t know what they are doing these three issues are likely to be insurmountable. However, for an experienced employment discrimination attorney and Discrimination lawyer Los Angeles can help you sort the problems successfully is what he or she can do to get justice! 

Who can help you? 

If you live in the Los Angeles or Orange County area and believe that you have been unlawfully discriminated, harassed or wrongfully terminated then you should contact discrimination lawyer Los Angeles as soon as possible. An experienced Los Angeles employment discrimination lawyer is able to tell you upfront whether they think you have a viable case. Some of the best employment law attorneys in the Los Angeles area don’t ask any payment upfront, and will only be paid if they get money for your case, no recovery no fee. 

Get in touch with our experts to find out facts about your employee rights California from a top employment law firm in the Los Angeles area. We love to assist you by guiding employees about their rights for free, so call today.

A Los Angeles County sex crimes investigator accused of raping a teenager after having been assigned to investigate her previous sexual assault allegations has pleaded guilty to lesser charges, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison.It was at least the third time the detective, Neil David Kimball of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, was accused of misconduct while on duty, though he was not charged as a result of the first two allegations.District Attorney Gregory Totten of Ventura County, whose office prosecuted the case, said in a statement that Kimball, 46, met the then-15-year-old victim in 2017 when she reported a sexual assault.He befriended her and then sexually assaulted her, according to the statement.Kimball was originally charged with raping the victim while she was tied or bound. Kimball was also accused of “witness intimidation by threat of force”.But Patrice Koenig, a spokesperson for the district attorney’s office, said that prosecutors later determined they could not prove that Kimball had used force during the encounter, which she said took place in his trailer in Camarillo, in southern Ventura County.The girl did not report the encounter. Rather, when a different officer took over her case about a year later, her father told the new investigator about the assault, Ms Koenig said.Kimball pleaded guilty last week to a lewd act with a child and unlawful sexual intercourse, and is expected to be sentenced to three years in prison at his next appearance, on 8 August. He must also register as a sex offender.In a statement, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department said that Kimball’s pay was suspended in March and that it was seeking to terminate him immediately. A lawyer for Kimball declined to comment.Kimball’s plea comes just more than a month after Sara Abusheikh, a Los Angeles fashion designer, wrote in a post on Medium about her experience with the detective after she was sexually assaulted by an acquaintance in 2014, and reported it to the authorities.Kimball was assigned to her case, but she wrote that he never investigated, and instead said wildly inappropriate things to her.Ms Abusheikh wrote that Kimball teased her about going back to her assailant and suggested she “let him make love to you gently”.“His only interest in the details of my rape came in the form of perverse, sick questions, and he – most tellingly – suggested he come inside to get high,” she wrote.She later filed a restraining order against her assailant, which led Kimball to joke that she was paranoid, she wrote. When she reported his inappropriate behaviour to his supervisor, word got back to Kimball immediately, she added.The next summer, after getting help from a rape treatment centre, she met with the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office, which declined to prosecute the case, she wrote.A deputy district attorney told her Kimball was “a fine detective” and insisted there was no evidence to back up her claim, she wrote.“And the Special Victims Bureau? It only functioned to protect not one, but two, alleged rapists,” Ms Abusheikh concluded in her essay.The Los Angeles County district attorney’s office declined to comment on Ms Abusheikh’s post.Last year, Ms Abusheikh shared screenshots of text messages she said were from Kimball with The Daily Beast, as well as records of email exchanges with lawyers and patient advocates from the rape treatment centre. She did not return calls or respond to messages seeking further comment.Kimball, a 20-year veteran of the sheriff’s department, was assigned to the Special Victims Bureau in 2013, The Los Angeles Times reported.The bureau has been involved in high-profile cases, including accusations by a young actor that he was sexually abused by Asia Argento, a leading figure in the MeToo movement, who had herself accused the producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. She denied the allegations.In 2009, Kimball was investigated for sexual battery but not charged after an episode at a hotel the previous year, The Los Angeles Times reported.According to the report, which was based on a prosecutor’s memo, the detective had questioned a group of friends in a parking lot.Afterward, women in the group and Kimball went to a hotel room, where some of the women stripped down to their underwear and got into a hot tub as he encouraged them, the memo stated.It also said that one woman accused the detective of grabbing her hand and trying to place it on his genitals.But no charges were filed. Witnesses gave contradictory statements, there was a lack of evidence and the complainant failed to cooperate with investigators, the memo said.Greg Risling, a spokesperson for the Los Angeles County district attorney, confirmed that the office had declined to prosecute Kimball over the hotel incident. In an email, he said that no other cases involving the detective were under review.The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office had also urged any additional victims to come forward, Ms Koenig said, but none did so.Asked last year why Kimball was selected to serve in the Special Victims Bureau even after the 2008 hotel allegations, the sheriff’s department told The Los Angeles Times it would “conduct a review of the internal process” related to the assignment.The department did not respond to a question about the outcome of that review.Grier Weeks, senior executive at the National Association to Protect Children, a non-profit in Knoxville, Tennessee, that pushes for child protection laws, said that the sentence was too light considering the severity of the crime.“There should be more severe penalties for people in positions of authority or trust who assault a child,” he said. “It’s something that has to be treated as the most serious type of assault.”New York Times

from Yahoo News - Latest News & Headlines https://ift.tt/30HvEpX