Tumgik
#lawful evil
red-dead-sakharine · 3 months
Text
Korrilla insight check
When you speak to Korrilla in Sharess' Caress after taking Raphael's deal, there's an insight check that gets you some rare dialogue if you don't press her on it.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Notables:
"He's as honest as his life is long" - He does not lie to you. His contract might have loopholes, but that's on you for not reading right.
"treats me right and feeds me well" - He's good to his allies as long as they do good work (he notes in one of his journals that Korrilla does a good job)
"he's barely been home since he met you" - Likely why the HoH is in such a state. I doubt a being of order would approve of the rotting dinner table.
"I hope things turn out well for you" - She likes us. Raphael likes us. They like us.
To me, he's not an actual villain. He has a clear liking for the main character. And he only attacks us if we betray him and rob his house. Yes, he's lawful evil. But he's not a villain to our story, unless we become a villain to his.
Tumblr media
Alternative convo path:
Tumblr media
171 notes · View notes
junorsky · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Two unnamed Cambions
Me and my devils again
136 notes · View notes
witchthewriter · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
𝐌𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐀𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝
I thought I should make a post explaining why I add a moral alignment to every character I write for! 
This way of describing characters came about in a 1977 version of the Dungeons & Dragons handbook by Gary Gygax. The alignment system was based on the fantasy stories of Michael Moorcock and Poul Anderson.
It was a way for players to decide how their characters would think and act in the game. And I’ve now integrated it as a part of how I see characters and their motives. 
Here’s a few alignment tests if you’d like to find out for yourself! 
(P.s each test has different questions so one might not give you the same answer as the other. Quite like the Hogwarts House quizzes). 
Comment down below or reblog with your result!
Test One. 
Test Two. 
Test Three. 
Test Four. 
Test Five. 
𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Superman, Brienne of Tarth, Robocop. 
Crusaders
・They’re the protectors, but also seen as morally rigid and stubborn
・Always do the right thing; what’s expected of them by society
・Feel very uncomfortable breaking the rules
・They believe in societal rules and expect everyone to follow those rules. They can be blinded by their righteousneous at times. 
・They get angry when people get away with breaking the rules
・Believe good deeds and behaviours will be rewarded
・This alignment has good intentions; there is no malice in their actions - even if something bad may happen because of them
・They take pride in bringing ‘bad people’ to justice 
・The upside of this alignment is that it combines honour and compassion. 
・The downside of this alignment is that it retricts freedom and criminalises self-interest
・Sees Lawful Good as Honorable & Humane
・Sees Neutral Good as Humane but Unreliable
・Sees Chaotic Good as Humane but Dishonorable
・ Sees Lawful Neutral as Honorable but Apathetic
・Sees True Neutral as Unreliable & Apathetic 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Dishonorable & Apathetic 
・Sees Lawful Evil as Honorable but Ruthless 
・Sees Neutral Evil as Unreliable & Ruthless
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Dishonorable & Ruthless 
𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Jon Snow, Gandalf, Spiderman. 
Benefactors
・Believe in doing what’s right, even if that means going against the law 
・They help others because they have the desire to do so, not because the law or anyone else, tells them to do it 
・They recognise that the law can be unjust. They don’t blindly follow it. 
・Most protagonists embody this alignment. 
・They - usually - don’t kill, even if the villain is right in front of them. 
・The upside of this alignment is that they will do whatever they can to help those in need
・The downside of this alignment is that they can become unpredictable when they think they’re doing the right thing 
・They don’t disregard the law completely, but will break it if it means helping someone
・The difference between Neutral Good and Chaotic Good, is that CG hates authority and the government/leading state. While NG thinks there is a reason for rules. 
・It’s a great alignment because it means doing good without bias for or against order. But can be a bad/dangerous one because it can limit the actions of the truly capable. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Humane but Strict
・Sees Neutral Good as Practical & Humane
・Sees Chaotic Good as Humane but Lax
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Strict & Apathetic
・Sees True Neutral as Practical but Apathetic 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Lax & Apathetic
・Sees Lawful Evil as Strict & Ruthless
・Sees Neutral Evil as Practical but Ruthless
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Lax & Ruthless
𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: the 11th Doctor, Robin Hood, Mary Poppins. 
Rebels
・They don’t care about society’s rules, they care about what’s doing right 
・Freedom is their highest value 
・Detest authority
・This is the best alignment you can be because it combines a free-spirit with a good heart. 
・They believe freedom is the only way a person can feel true happiness
・The upside of this alignment is that they will do absolutely everything in their power not only to help innocence, but bring about change if they can
・The downside of this alignment is that they disrupt the order of society and punish those who do well for themselves 
・CG will keep their word to anyone who isn’t evil
・The difference between Chaotic Good and Chaotic Neutral is that CG is self-aware of their actions. They don’t want other people to get hurt.
・They’re willing to lie, cheat and steal if it’s for the greater good 
・CGs’ don’t put their desires above the greater good; they want to help in every way they can. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Humane but Dogmatic
・Sees Neutral Good as Humane but Conformist
・Sees Chaotic Good as Independent & Humane 
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Dogmatic & Apathetic
・Sees True Neutral as Conformist & Apathetic
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Independent but Apathetic 
・Sees Lawful Evil as Dogmatic & Ruthless
・Sees Neutral Evil as Conformist & Ruthless
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Independent but Ruthless
𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Dwight K. Schrute, Percy Weasley, Judge Dredd. 
Judges
・Lawful Neutrals’ always act in accordance with the law, tradition or code. 
・They behave in a way that matches the organisation they follow. They’re deathly loyal to it. 
・Because they are so emotionless when following their tradition/law, they can come off as Lawful Evil
・The upside of this alignment is that they are reliable and honorable without being a zealot 
・The downside of this alignment is that they seek to destroy choice, freedom, individuality, diversity. 
・They believe in the government wholeheartedly, even if it’s hurting its citizens. Even if it is becoming tyranical. 
・LN have blind loyalty
・They rarely seek things for themselves. Their desires line up with the laws and traditions. 
・The difference between Lawful Good and Lawful Neutral is that LG will question the laws that are hurtful to others. They aren’t completely following blindly. They speak up. 
・Lawful Neutral doesn’t consider morality when abiding by the law
・Sees Lawful Good as Honorable but Idealistic
・Sees Neutral Good as Unreliable & Idealistic
・Sees Chaotic Good as Dishonorable & Idealistic
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Honorable & Realistic
・Sees True Neutral as Realistic but Unreliable
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Realistic but Dishonorable 
・Sees Lawful Evil as Honorable but Egotistic
・Sees Neutral Evil as Unreliable but Egotistic 
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Dishonorable and Egotistic 
𝐓𝐑𝐔𝐄 𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: The Chesire Cat, Lara Croft, Malcolm Reynolds. 
Undecideds
・True definition of ‘on the fence’
・They neither want to hurt nor help others; they only want to keep themselves alive and will do whatever that means to make sure it happens. 
・They don’t uphold the laws but neither do they rebel
・The upside of this alignment is that they act naturally - without prejudice.
・The downside is that they lack conviction and are apathetic. 
・Basically...they are nice to those that are nice to them and hurt those that hurt them. 
・True Neutrals’ are offended by those with big opinions 
・They despise bigots
・And usually avoid philosophical ideals altogether 
・Will keep their word if it’s in their best interest 
・Will never betray a family member, friend or ally unless the situation is dire 
・True Neutral characters stay non-committed to any cause, legal or moral system. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Strict & Idealistic 
・Sees Neutral Good as Practical but Idealistic 
・Sees Chaotic Good as Lax & Idealistic 
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Realistic but Strict
・Sees True Neutral as Practical & Realistic 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Realistic but Lax
・Sees Lawful Evil as Strict & Egotistic 
・Sees Neutral Evil as Practical but Egotistic
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Lax & Egotistic 
𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Han Solo, Captain Jack Sparrow, Catwoman. 
Free-Spirits
・Chaotic Neutrals’ follow their heart, but in comparison with Chaotic Goods’ they won’t self-sacrifice for the greater good. 
・They hate being given orders, and actively go against the law. Even if it’s because of something petty. 
・They can easily slip into Chaotic Good or Chaotic Evil with one step 
・This alignment is the best you can be because it represents true freedom from the law, societal standards and a moral code. 
・They can be a dangerous alignment because they want to destroy authorative figures and structures; even if it’s doing good for the community. 
・They believe there is no order to anything, even their actions. They’re completely unpredictable and may do things on a whim. 
・This alignment is usually the con-mans, the gamblers, insurgent. Aka, the uncomitted free-loader who desires nothing more than self-gratification. 
・CN will keep their word if it serves their self-interest
・These people don’t want people to suffer because of their actiohs - but don’t care if their actions may hurt others. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Dogmatic & Idealistic 
・Sees Neutral Good as Conformist & Idealistic 
・Sees Chaotic Good as Independent but Idealistic 
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Realistic but Dogmatic 
・Sees True Neutral as Realistic but Conformist 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Independent & Realistic 
・Sees Lawful Evil as Dogmatic & Egotistic
・Sees Neutral Evil as Conformist & Egotistic
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Independent but Egotistic 
𝐋𝐀𝐖𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Darth Vader, Dolores Umbridge, Lex Luther. 
Dominators
・This alignment is a tyrant 
・They have no problem with for-going morals in honor of the law. 
・The downside of this alignment is that evil combined with law, means a society-wide regimes. 
・Fannatics, dictators and extremists fall under this alignment
・This alignment cares about traditions, enforcing the law and keeping order
・These people/characters consider themselves the best because they combine ‘honour’ with a dedicated self-interest. 
・However, this is the most dangerous alignment because these people will manipulate the law to suit their desires
・They hold any Lawful alignment as honorable, chaotics as dishonorable. 
・Lawful Evil absolutely hate Chaotic Good people/characters very ... very much. They pose the most threat. 
・Labelled ‘diabolical’, Lawful Evils’ will always use the rules. No matter how evil they are, they will never break the rules. 
・They will do anything; kill, maim, torture - as long as it doesn’t break the law. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Honorable but Self-Righteous
・Sees Neutral Good as Unreliable & Self-righteous
・Sees Chaotic Good as Dishonorable & Self-Righteous
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Honorable but Irresolute
・Sees True Neutral as Unreliable & Irresolute 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Dishonorable & Irresolute
・Sees Lawful Evil as Honorable & Determined
・Sees Neutral Evil as Determined but Unreliable 
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Determined but Dishonorable 
𝐍𝐄𝐔𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: Voldemort, Jabba the Hutt, Milady de Winter.
Malefactors
・Is selfish and has no issue with harming others to get what they want 
・They might follow rules if it serves them, but they do not feel bound to them
・This alignment usually makes alliances with others to further their own agenda, but have no issue with double-crossing their allies
・They don’t see much value in having a moral code 
・They’re feared because they carry out evil for evil’s sake
・They believe themselves the best alignment because they advance themselves without regard for others
・This alignment is only out for themselves; they don’t care about bringing down social structures. Instead, they have a desire and they will do whatever it is to get it. 
・The difference between Lawful Evil and Neutral Evil is that LE still follows the law and its structures. NE may follow the law - only if it works in their favour, then they have no problem going below it to their gain
・The difference between Neutral Evil and Chaotic Evil is that the latter is completely unpredictable. NE will at least have a reason why they’ve allied with someone, or are following the rules in some way. CE will do things for absolutely no reason. 
・Sees Lawful Good as Strict & Self-Righteous 
・Sees Neutral Good as Practical but Self-Righteous
・Sees Chaotic Good as Lax & Self-Righteous 
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Strict & Irresolute
・Sees True Neutral as Practical but Irresolute
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Lax & Irresolute
・Sees Lawful Evil as Determined but Strict 
・Sees Neutral Evil as Practical & Determined
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Determined but Laxed
𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐄𝐕𝐈𝐋
𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒: The Joker, The Night King, James Moriarty. 
Destroyers
・These characters are malevolent 
・Villains vying for revenge usually fall under this alignment 
・One may see this as the most evil as they set out to destroy everything - order, life, tradition, freedom. 
・They think they are the best alignment because they choose freedom and self-interest 
・These people/characters never feel the need to keep to their word 
・They prefer to work alone
・Just like the other Chaotic alignments, they too hate authority, and actively seek to destroy it
・Will kill for pleasure, has no moral code, doesn’t care at all about the wel-fare for others
・They believe self-discipline and honour as restrictive 
・Seen as the most frightening because they are so unpredictable and violent 
・ Lawful Good is the antithesis of Chaotic Evil
・Chaotic Evils’ believe that freedom should only belong to those strong enough to keep it
・Sees Lawful Good as Dogmatic & Self-Righteous
・Sees Neutral Good as Conformist & Self-Righteous 
・Sees Chaotic Good as Independent but Self-Righteous 
・Sees Lawful Neutral as Dogmatic & Irresolute
・Sees True Neutral as Conformist & Irresolute 
・Sees Chaotic Neutral as Independent but Irresolute 
・Sees Lawful Evil as Determined but Dogmatic 
・Sees Neutral Evil as Determined but Conformist
・Sees Chaotic Evil as Independent & Determined 
336 notes · View notes
alethianightsong · 11 months
Text
Across the Spider-verse is 10/10 in animation, story, voice acting, and soundtrack (MILD spoilers)
To all the people who “Spider-Man can’t be black!” in 2018, Imma need y’all to hold that L indefinitely. Due to the concept of the multiverse, Spider-Man is literally all races, creeds, and backgrounds and it’s canon. There’s Indian, Muslima, paraplegic, Latino, and 4 different black Spider-people. The movie is 2hrs and 20-ish minutes, so PLEASE don’t bring your toddler cuz their attention span is gonna plummet an hour in. The plot of this movie is for the people who saw the first movie, so it’s matured with the original audience. Miguel O’Hara wants to preserve the multiverse (saving billions of lives), meaning each Spider-person’s story has to play out the same (get bit by a spider, your uncle dies, police captain dies). Miles Morales was NEVER supposed to be Spider-man (remember his spider came from Universe 42). Miguel’s all like “you’re not supposed to be Spider-Man but since you ARE Spider-Man, your police captain dad needs to die to keep your story consistent with the rest of us.” Miles response is “Hol’ up, you want me to sit back and let my dad die? I know these deaths make us who we are, but if we have the power to save people, then we should do the responsible thing and save them.” Both Miguel and Miles think they’re doing the responsible thing (letting canon play out vs saving lives regardless of canon). Miguel is lawful evil, believing the needs of the many outweigh the few. Miles’s very existence disrupts Spider-man canon, but he IS Spider-Man, whether he was fated to be or not. Also, Miguel keeps saying that the Spot is the huge threat to the multiverse then spends 15 minutes chasing down Miles, diverting a good portion of his resources to capturing him. HELLO, I thought you said the Spot >> Miles so why are you focusing on one kid and not the multiverse-ending superbeing?
166 notes · View notes
la-gay-and-shits · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Idk man I made at 8am with no sleep
110 notes · View notes
thecatslug · 4 months
Text
Who said it: Strahd or the DM?
(I thought I’d share players’ favorite OOC game to play, courtesy of our campaign quote list)
“I tend to be somewhat vindictive when caught on a bad day.”
“Brooding is very important to my self care”
“The world is full of disappointments. But that doesn’t mean I can’t be mad about its inefficacy.”
“What is your deepest fear? […] That’s stupid. Pick again.”
“You can be self destructive in other ways. You simply aren’t thinking creatively.”
“I too get angry at small children, contemplate their doom, and then find them utterly amusing all in the same evening.”
“You underestimate my peerless ability to self-isolate.”
“Personally, sleep deprivation is my drug of choice.”
“The control issues are bad, but I’m far too controlling to give them up.”
“I say this with the deepest kindness I can muster: did you simply lack human contact for an extended period of time? Were you, perhaps, raised by wolves?”
53 notes · View notes
ayyy-imma-ninja · 7 months
Note
So what I’m hearing is the SK bros are lawful evils, right?
I can see why you'd see them as such, but we find them to be more Lawful Neutral, or even True Neutral.
Here's the definition for Lawful Evil according to Google:
A lawful evil villain methodically takes what he wants within the limits of his code of conduct without regard for whom it hurts. He cares about tradition, loyalty, and order but not about freedom, dignity or life. He plays by the rules but without mercy or compassion.
Sun and Moon do take in regard who they hurt; not just the Rulebreakers, but their families too. They care about the freedoms of the abused and mistreated children. They may show no mercy for the Rulebreakers, but their compassion is directed towards the children and anyone else who was hurt by Rulebreakers.
Sun and Moon protect who they can, and hurt who they have to.
69 notes · View notes
officialdashcon2024 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
WHO ARE YOU???
32 notes · View notes
blackfinchart · 3 months
Text
Spent a long time making a silly funny post about seooxs and then I realized I’m an art tumblr my job is to post art
Tumblr media
So have a Thyra (Thyrra? Can’t remember) daughter of the Grand Sorceress and Warrior King!
My last ever DnD character: Lawful Evil literal barbarian princess (her nation worships a meritocratic lightning snake)
She’s come to your lands as a “diplomat” and to show that she’s diplomatic her men have occupied a town that no one seems to care about far to the north east. Oopsie! You’re welcome!
Submit, or die well! 💪⛈️🐍
23 notes · View notes
yourgirlfoe · 10 months
Text
Pillow case? What crimes did the pillows commit?
79 notes · View notes
bugpysforge · 12 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
For the use of her companions in combat, Normal of the Deoxys Party manufactures armour, weaponry, and shields. Their group has a reputation for being unstoppable.
Race: Cyborg Class: Artificer Subclass: Battle Smith Specialist Location: Deoxys Party Alignment: Lawful Evil
View the pokedex of all dungeon pokemon by following the link in the menu.
11 notes · View notes
randomencounters · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Encounter: Evil Pope
89 notes · View notes
nythscribble · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
this is old art but ough,, I've been feeling like drawing them a lot lately
Their name is Drift and they're an antagonist from my story w/ @rain-11
Trying to stop the fantasy industrial revolution, by any means necessary :)
33 notes · View notes
pollsaplenty · 1 year
Text
50 notes · View notes
maspers · 7 months
Text
palm trees are lawful evil and I kind of respect them for that
16 notes · View notes
Text
Found my notes for when I was trying to make sense of alignments
No, you don't need to box your character into a single alignment, and yes, they're silly
But it's always nice to just have a starting point. Like, "you need to know the rules first so you can know how to break them" type of thing (that's paraphrased writing advice I've come across and really love)
Without further ado, H / V = Hero or Villain respectively, but they're just stereotypical hero or villain here. Please feel free to break the norm and mess around :)
LG, H "I do the right thing coz it's the right thing to do"
LN, HV "I'm just following the rules." could be good or bad rules
LE, V "I'm evil but I have a code / standards."
NG, HV "Good =/= Law." sometimes you might have to break the law to do good
TN, V "Eh. I do what I want, but calmly."
NE, V "I'm evil how I want to be."
CG, HV "I'm trying to do good, sometimes it has costs. Or sometimes I go over what's socially acceptable and seem silly but am appreciated."
CN, V "I have fun doing what I want."
CE, V "I enjoy destruction."
43 notes · View notes