Tumgik
#kink positive
fucktoyfelix · 2 days
Text
Does anyone know where kinky people in Japan socialize online? I'm going to be living in Kyoto for four months and would love to have some hook ups there
25 notes · View notes
hussyknee · 1 year
Text
Shout-out to the brazen AO3 smut crankers posting the nastiest, most unholy filth I can only save in private bookmarks. Y'all's cojones are solid brass. The international sexual deviant community thanks you for your service
12K notes · View notes
fixing-bad-posts · 14 days
Text
Tumblr media
everybody wants to see kink at a pride parade
898 notes · View notes
xx-slug-xx · 2 months
Text
“Your fantasies equal your real life desires”
I’m fucking asexual? I have no desire to do anything I fantasize about irl. Same with a shit ton of other people who are aspec?
Tbh, I think it’s just queerphobic, specifically aphobic but other shit too, to say “your fantasies are what you want irl.
It’s not just aspecs either. I know a fuck ton of lesbians who fantasize about fictional men. They are not any less lesbians because of their fantasies though.
I could go on with more about how it’s a stupid argument, and even how it’s ableist in certain contexts, but I’ll save that for other posts lmao
440 notes · View notes
Tumblr media
Credit: insta @/acedadadvice
[there was no image description on Instagram or Facebook, I would welcome if someone wrote one into a reblog]
Obviously these terms aren’t set in stone, these definitions aren’t gospel, use whatever definition/ term you are most comfortable with!
I’m sharing this because I went “oh hey, it me!” when I saw this.
I have made it a point to call myself averse to sex consistently and I will keep using sex-aversion to describe my views. It’s nice to see this info-graphic mention aegosexuality in context of that :)
Because yea, I’m a sex-averse aego-ace
EDIT FOR CLARIFICATION: Aegosexual as a sub- / micro-label for asexuality is not inherently connected to being sex-averse. The mention of aegosexuality in this context refers to an aego-ace being comfortable with the fantasy/ idea/ imagination of sex without necessarily wanting to participate in those sexual acts. Many aegosexuals use the label because we prefer sexual fantasies and things we can remove ourselves from (aego literally meaning “without self”). Not all aego-aces are sex-averse. Which is precisely why I said “mentioned in the context of that” since aegosexuality is not inherent to being sex-averse and sex-aversion is not inherent to aegosexuality.
Also, please keep in mind this is about personal feelings towards sex and towards participating in sex. Most asexuals are sex-positive which means we support that everyone has the right to have as much or as little sex, as vanilla or as kinky, as they want to have.
Sex is not shameful, sex is simply something people can do with their bodies. Sex is exactly as meaningful/ intimate as the people participating want it to be. A bodily activity or the most intimate act to share with your chosen partner – it’s as important as you make it out to be, nothing more, nothing less.
386 notes · View notes
catgirl-catboy · 3 months
Text
"Murder is okay to glorify because nobody is getting off on it."
You sweet summer child. Everything is somebodies kink, write that down. I've met many people that enjoy gore and murder in a sexual way (and most of them were lovely people, but not relevant)
and I think its very telling that the worst thing you can fathom is somebody getting off to shit you hate, and not, you know, a real person being hurt.
383 notes · View notes
fucktoyfelix · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
88K notes · View notes
starrycollaredboy · 6 months
Text
Btw if u have ocd and u have weird taboo kinks im here to reasure you that ur intrusive thoughts abt doing things because of those kinks do not make u a bad person and do not mean that you "secretly want to act on them".
You are not going to hurt anyone.
263 notes · View notes
thefollow-spot · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Kink at pride!
4K notes · View notes
cosmileech · 11 days
Note
there is a huge debate on Twitter where someone suddenly started caring about sexualizing religious figures (nuns in this case) and that not even trauma is an excuse to do this
and you guessed it, the post gathered a ton of likes, puriteens agreeing that it’s bad, radfems agreeing with them and it let Nazis flock to the post who called queer people bad things (and OP didn’t care, they just “wanted to make a statement”)
The thing is though, I agree that sexualizing people who don’t want to be sexualized is bad. However:
no one was talking about irl nuns, people sexualize the concept of putting a character into a costume and they do this definitely not because they hate Christianity
Nuns often don’t become nuns out of free will, there are often personal things involved that force women into becoming chaste and modest
This forced chastity and modestity religion imposes on women is already objectification
funnily enough sex and divinity are more connected than these people believe
the worst isn’t someone drawing a sexy nun but the church demonizing BIPOC, abusing, children and women, covering up said abuse, erasing the language to help victims, and tbh they also largely fund and or promote anti LGBTQ+ legislations.
The fact that this is all overlooked for the sake of protecting the boundaries of entirely fake characters and having antis (both young and old) agree or play dumb when you tell them that THESE are bigger issues makes me mad. Like there wasn’t a single real nun who objected, they were all mad about the boundaries of people that weren’t involved at all
also assuming that women choose to become nuns because they don’t want to be sexualized is already the core belief of radical feminists. So much for progressiveness!
and my god so many people agree that trauma victims are also less worth than the chastity of a fake nun
Honestly, the sexualization of nuns is so funny to me because... I mean, why do they care? Promise you guys that most nuns aren't scrolling twitter r34 and getting personally offended by Alastor in religious cloaks. And also, nuns aren't going to have sex anyway, so the kink stays completely in fiction whether that's writing or roleplay.
81 notes · View notes
xx-slug-xx · 2 months
Text
Pup hood discourse is fucking stupid imo. If people are just wearing them, and not acting like complete fools, who fucking cares?
“Bluh it’s kink gear!”
Yeah. They CAN be. So can fursuits in general. Some fursuits are murrsuits, but not all of them are. A chain necklace can be kink gear. So can leather boots. A LOT of things CAN be used as kink gear. But a lot of things can also just be a form of expression. Hell, there’s a shit tone of things out there that were a HUGE part of the kink community that, over time, just became part of normal fashion in the modern day. Croakers, leather, chains, and a ton of other things all have a huge role to play in kink. But I can go to most places in public and probably see people wearing things like that.
Unless I see someone in a pup hood who is obviously engaging in kink in public, I don’t care. It’s about the person and the way they behave in a public setting, not the accessory they are wearing.
Pup hoods are cool and so is the pup community! Never had a bad experience with anyone in that community and I’ve only had positive interactions!
96 notes · View notes