Tumgik
#hypocrisy illegal immigrants
odinsblog · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Neoliberals were rightfully performatively enraged when Trump enacted his racist Title 42 policy, but they want us to believe it’s somehow a different story now, when Biden does the exact same thing.
Biden is fundamentally altering the asylum seeking process so that it favors European refugees and asylum seekers, while punishing people from Haiti, Mexico and South & Central America.
To be clear: This is an unequal and deeply racist policy.
Joseph Robinette Biden is the undisputed Deporter-in-Chief (of Black and Brown people).
Tumblr media
(source)
Additionally, blocking non-European asylum seekers does not and has never had anything to do with the evergreen, conveniently racist trope of “refugees bringing diseases.” That was racist when Trump did it, and it’s still racist when mainstream media and the Biden administration echo those exact same sentiments—if it were at all true, Biden wouldn’t have relaxed the Title 42 restrictions for Ukrainian war refugees, even as he was turning away thousands and thousands of Haitian war refugees.
Tumblr media
Liberals told us, don’t worry they would push Biden left after the election. But they just went back to brunch, and now they’re the hypocritical sycophants telling us that we are “hurting” Biden by holding him accountable and reminding him of all his broken campaign promises.
Make no mistake: this is Biden tracking to the right before an election. He’s seeking the votes of “moderates” (aka slightly less racist Republicans) by showing that he can be every bit as tough on non-white immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers as any Republican. The only problem here is, Republicans are tracking Right and so are Democrats… so until this dynamic changes, it means we will always shift ever rightward on our immigration policies.
This is racist and it is wrong.
90 notes · View notes
madame-helen · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
Text
Circle Enjoys Their Policies
Tumblr media
0 notes
megashadowdragon · 2 years
Video
youtube
when you have literally zero self awareness
comments on youtube
"If you move to a place you should speak the language!" "You're talking about the people crossing in the USA right?" "... SHUT UP!"
Pot calling the kettle. Delicious when the shoe is on the other foot. Kind of like sanctuary cities not wanting illegal immigrants to settle there. Hypocrisy at its finest. Know what is ironic about all this? Having self-awareness is something my African American ancestors who have actually been through oppression tried so hard to gain, and in turn, allow us to have. You can't call yourself a free, intelligent person if you're not allowed to know anything about yourself.
0 notes
mariacallous · 4 months
Text
‘I don’t like it when a comedian just spouts his own political views and relies on the audience agreeing with him to get a round of applause,’ announces Ricky Gervais in his new Netflix Special Armageddon. For 60-minutes Gervais, clad in his usual black t-shirt and jeans get-up, tells jokes about dwarfs, gay people, ‘disabled creatures’, African babies with AIDs, Chinese people eating dogs, people pretending to be asylum seekers, people pretending to have ADHD, students taking micky mouse degrees, Greta Thunberg, homeless people (‘fucking horrible’) and the fragile and narcissistic ‘woke’ youth. Which is to say that Gervais just spouts his own political views and relies on the audience agreeing with him to get a round of applause.
Gervais’s portrayal of David Brent in mockumentary The Office (2002) was a work of comic genius. Brent, a hapless white-collar middle manager who desperately wants to be popular, cuts a pathetic but ultimately sympathetic figure. The viewer didn’t so much hate Brent as feel sorry for him; he was an uncalibrated fool but a well meaning one, hence the happy ending written for him in the Christmas Specials that brought the curtain down on the story in 2003. Gervais foolishly resurrected Brent in 2016 for a feature length spin-off, Life on the Road (2016), this time without the grounding influence of his original co-writer on The Office Stephen Merchant. All of a sudden the charm had gone out of the franchise and Brent had morphed into something genuinely tragic and repulsive, trucking in boring jokes about gays and fat people.
Expressing any form of reservation or note of disapproval about anti-woke comedy nowadays is to get oneself marked down as an invertebrate. For those of us who possess a strong enough constitution to sit through jokes that poke fun at the shibboleths of political correctness - provided they are actually funny - retorts like this don’t hold much water. But I’ve come to realise that such humour is increasingly sustained by a section of the audience being reliably ‘offended’ by it and kicking off. How else to keep the lucrative conceit going which says that rich middle aged white men telling rollicking jokes about asylum seekers are heroic truth-tellers saying the unsayable? These days Gervais’s adoring fanbase seem more enthusiastic at the prospect of upsetting their political opponents than about the material itself. And who could blame them: most of the jokes in Armageddon are hackneyed and stale - ‘Doctor, Doctor, I keep thinking I’m a pair of curtains’; ‘You are then’. Heady stuff that is indeed guaranteed to ‘annoy all the right people’.
Netflix describes Armageddon as ‘controversial takes on political correctness and oversensitivity in a taboo-busting comedy special about the end of humanity’. Yet those on the receiving end of Gervais’s barbs are hardly considered off limits by the wider culture: illegal immigrants, the homeless and transgender people are all regularly subjected to invective from government politicians and Britain’s overwhelmingly right-wing media. By all means make an off-colour joke about those groups if you wish: I’m a big boy and I know how to use the remote control. But you won’t convince me that publicly flogging these tabloid bête noires makes one a gutsy truth teller. It’s true that a disability charity condemned Armageddon before it was released on Christmas Day for a joke Gervais makes about terminally ill children. But it’s also true that Gervais is still on Netflix telling the joke, which perhaps gives a good indication of just how risqué this style of humour really is.
One of the biggest cheers from the audience during Gervais’s performance in Armageddon erupts in response to a fatuous joke about mobs pulling down statues originally put up to honour slave traders - another example of woke hypocrisy apparently. ‘He was a slave trader, pull down the fucking statue.’ ‘He built the hospital, should we pull that down too?’ ‘No, leave the hospital’. It’s certainly true that wealthy people have historically (and not just historically) tried to launder their reputations through philanthropy (and on this note Gervais enjoys boasting about how wealthy he is and how much money he donates to animals, who he prefers to humans). But you needn’t take a course in critical race theory to recognise that those who became uncontrollably rich from the slave trade might have set aside some of their tainted money for similar ends. ‘Pride and vanity have built more hospitals than all the virtues together,’ wrote the Dutch physician Bernard de Mandeville in The Fable of the Bees, his eighteenth century polemic against philanthropic hypocrisy.
It isn’t for me to tell a comedian who the ‘correct’ target of his humour ought to be - comedy is subjective after all. But then Gervais’s current shtick is of a piece with right-wing populism more generally, characterised as it is by a servility to the very power it ostensibly rails against. I’m no more required to accept Gervais’s assessment of himself as a brave heretic saying the unsayable than I am obliged to join in with the hysterical blue pencil-wielding critics who really do want to see him cancelled. As to who is currently coming out on top, Armageddon is apparently the highest grossing single stand-up performance ever, bringing in £1,410,000 for a recent show at the Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles. Cancel culture indeed.
At one time conservatives and reactionaries would doggedly stand athwart history yelling Stop. Nowadays they need constant reassurance that they are still the plucky countercultural underdogs they imagined themselves to be in the halcyon days of their youth. Which is understandable I suppose. Nobody wants to be the angry young man whose waistband has inexorably expanded along with his list of blimpish grievances. ‘I think I am woke, but I think that word has changed,’ says Gervais. In other words it’s not him, it’s us. ‘No-one likes a white middle aged man anymore,’ laments Gervais at another point in the show. I’ve heard that one before too.
I used to enjoy Ricky Gervais but when I think of him today I always imagine some braying face demanding to know how ‘triggered’ I am by something puerile he’s said. This ‘type’ is seemingly ubiquitous at the moment: everything is geared toward getting a rise out of the libs and sticking it to the man in a way that doesn’t threaten one’s status as a servant of power (am I still allowed to say “man”? hehe - you get the gist).
The role of humour according to Gervais is ‘to laugh at bad shit to get us through it’. Which isn’t a terrible definition, though I suppose it depends on what one considers the ‘bad shit’ to be. I found much of the material in Armageddon indistinguishable from the endless bleating we hear in some quarters about the country going to the dawgs because of foreigners and queers and the young with their trendy ailments and political correctness et cetera. I can’t say I feel hysterical or offended by jokes about that stuff - soporific is more the word that springs to mind. Perhaps I should just be grateful that Gervais didn’t make an ‘Orange man bad’ joke. Maybe he’s saving those gags for his next Netflix Special when Donald Trump is President of the United States again. Important to laugh at the truly bad shit first though right.
66 notes · View notes
saywhat-politics · 3 months
Text
One word can describe Republicans' views on undocumented immigrants: dehumanizing. Not too long ago, Republican “religious” voters justified��Trump’s horrible family separation policy for migrants, sometimes referred to as “kids in cages.” Trump had an obsession with harming migrants fleeing with their families who were trying to declare asylum at the Southern border. He openly suggested violent ideas:
Privately, the president had often talked about fortifying a border wall with a water-filled trench, stocked with snakes or alligators, prompting aides to seek a cost estimate. He wanted the wall electrified, with spikes on top that could pierce human flesh. After publicly suggesting that soldiers shoot migrants if they threw rocks, the president backed off when his staff told him that was illegal. But later in a meeting, aides recalled, he suggested that they shoot migrants in the legs to slow them down. That’s not allowed either, they told him.
31 notes · View notes
ukrfeminism · 11 months
Text
3 minute read
Anti-slavery charity Unseen says it is receiving record numbers of calls to its helpline, with significantly more reports of forced labour, domestic servitude and people being trafficked for sex.
Unseen saw a “huge increase” between 2021 and 2022 in the number of calls to the UK Modern Slavery & Exploitation Helpline reporting potential victims of forced labour in care homes or private residences, and is calling for proposed legislation that criminalises victims to be shelved. 
“To be serious about tackling modern slavery in the UK we need much more awareness of the true size of the problem, better support for victims, and many more resources going into targeting the criminals behind the exploitation”, said Justine Carter, director of Unseen.
“Instead, the UK is bringing in new migration laws that criminalise some victims of modern slavery, forcing them underground and keeping them vulnerable to traffickers.”
The news comes as Prime Minister RIshi Sunak is expected to tell a Council of Europe meeting in Iceland that policing human trafficking is “not working”.
“It is very clear that our current international system is not working, and our communities and the world’s most vulnerable people are paying the price,” Sunak said ahead of the trip “We need to do more to co-operate across borders and across jurisdictions to end illegal migration and stop the boats.”
But Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper accused the PM of “hypocrisy” and “trying to make it easier for trafficking gangs in the UK” with the Illegal Immigration Bill.
“If he really believes countries should tackle trafficking he should stop pushing through legislation at home which will make it even harder to prosecute traffickers,” Cooper said in a statement.
The Illegal Migration Bill currently being pushed through parliament seeks to “prevent and deter unlawful migration” but campaigners say it will ban support for victims of human trafficking and other forms of modern slavery.
Under the law, genuine victims of human trafficking who arrive in the UK on small boats won’t be allowed to enter the government’s framework for identifying victims of modern slavery and referring them for support, called the National Referral Mechanism (NRM). This means that a vulnerable person who arrives in the UK to seek asylum but is then trafficked into slavery will themselves be criminalised, rather than the traffickers. 
The helpline reported a 134 per cent rise in the number of cases of labour exploitation in sectors including hospitality, construction, farming and retail they received. 
A call to the helpline in 2021 led to the discovery of nine vulnerable Indian students who were being exploited in care homes in north Wales. They were found sleeping on mattresses in cramped and unsanitary conditions and were described as appearing to be always hungry.
More than 6,500 potential cases of of human trafficking were made to the helpline in 2022, a 116 per cent increase on the year before, but this is just “the tip of the iceberg”, with Unseen estimating that around 100,000 people in the UK are in modern slavery.
“It’s encouraging that more people are contacting us so that we can help them out of a life of misery,” said Carter, however, every call the charity receives is “one too many as slavery should not exist today.”
The helpline reported 479 cases of sexual exploitation, where people are forced into sex work, an increase of 66 per cent. 
Cases of domestic servitude, a form of forced labour where people working as cleaners, nannies, cooks or carers in private homes are unable to leave, rose by 75 per cent. 
In April The Big Issue reported on the case of Joanna – not her real name – who was brought to the UK as a domestic worker with a wealthy family from Dubai. She was forced to care for an elderly man for 12 hours a day, after which she was locked in a hotel room each night. 
“I didn’t think to run because I am honest. I had done nothing wrong, why should I run?” she told The Big Issue, “I have an employer, they should pay me.” But after weeks of forced labour in the UK she’d been paid just £20. 
She escaped after British police arrived at the hotel and advised her to run away. After a lengthy process, Joanna was identified as a victim of human trafficking by the government referral system.
Kalayaan, a charity supporting migrant domestic workers, is campaigning for a change to visa rules to make it easier for those from overseas to change employers. This would give them a legitimate escape route out of domestic servitude if their employer is being controlling, exploitative or abusive. 
Avril Sharp, who works on policy, campaigns and case work at Kalayaan, said that the rise in numbers of calls to the helpline aligns with the fact that the number of referrals to the NRM is currently the highest since it was established in 2009. 
“The NRM [is] nearing breaking point”, she told The Big Issue. 
“Kalayaan has been contacted by many survivors reporting difficulties in trying to access a referral to the NRM, and who have been advised by some to approach either the police or the helpline for further assistance.”
She argued that more organisations must be trained and allowed to refer potential victims of slavery to the NRM. 
“The government must acknowledge that the increase in numbers of survivors coming forward wanting to access advice, information and support means that there needs to be an increase in the numbers of trained and specialist non-statutory first responder organisations”, she said. 
65 notes · View notes
rtrixie · 10 months
Text
Over 400000 legal immigrants on top of doing basically nothing about illegal arrivals. Meloni is the biggest political fraud I’ve seen on the right in my lifetime.
Immigration is the core issue, no “based” talking points RW parties make on any other topic will matter if they don’t deliver on this.
36 notes · View notes
the-daily-tizzy · 1 year
Text
The wisdom of Ben Stein:
I never dreamed that I would have to face the prospect of not living in the United States of America, at least not the one I have known all my life. 
I have never wished to live anywhere else. 
This is my home and I was privileged to be born here. 
But today I woke up and as I had my morning coffee, I realized that everything is about to change. 
No matter how I vote, no matter what I say, something evil has invaded our nation, and our lives are never going to be the same. 
I have been confused by the hostility of family and friends. 
I look at people I have known all my life--so hate-filled that they agree with opinions they would never express as their own. 
I think that I may well have entered the Twilight Zone. 
We have become a nation that has lost its collective mind! 
You can't justify this insanity:
If a guy pretends to be a woman, you are required to pretend with him.
Somehow it’s un-American for the census to count how many Americans are in America.
Russians influencing our elections are bad, but illegals voting in our elections are good.
It was cool for Joe Biden to "blackmail" the President of Ukraine, but it’s an impeachable offense if Donald Trump inquires about it.
Twenty is too young to drink a beer, but eighteen is old enough to vote.
People who have never owned slaves should pay slavery reparations to people who have never been slaves.
People who have never been to college should pay the debts of college students who took out huge loans for their degrees.
Immigrants with tuberculosis and polio are welcome, but you’d better be able to prove your dog is vaccinated.
Irish doctors and German engineers who want to immigrate to the US must go through a rigorous vetting process, but any illiterate gang-bangers who jump the southern fence are welcome.
$5 billion for border security is too expensive, but $1.5 trillion for “free” health care is not.
If you cheat to get into college you go to prison, but if you cheat to get into the country you go to college for free.
People who say there is no such thing as gender are demanding a female President.
We see other countries going Socialist and collapsing, but it seems like a great plan to us.
Some people are held responsible for things that happened before they were born, and other people are not held responsible for what they are doing right now.
Criminals are caught-and-released to hurt more people, but stopping them is bad because it's a violation of THEIR rights.
And pointing out all this hypocrisy somehow makes us "racists"?!
Nothing makes sense anymore - no values, no morals, and no civility. 
People are dying of a Chinese virus, but it's racist to refer to it as Chinese even though it began in China. 
We are clearly living in an upside down world where right is wrong and wrong is right, where moral is immoral and immoral is moral, where good is evil and evil is good, where killing murderers is wrong but killing unborn babies is A-OK! 
Wake up America, the great unsinkable ship Titanic America has hit an iceberg, is taking on water, and is sinking fast. Speak up!
Even if this isn’t Ben Stein... it still makes sense...
113 notes · View notes
originalleftist · 1 month
Text
I despise the proposed immigration bill, wish Biden wouldn't support it, but he's 100% right to blast the Republicans for their hypocrisy on it.
Also full credit to him for:
a) Rebuking the Republican hecklers and their lynch mob propaganda, noting that more violence is committed by those who are not illegal immigrants than those who are.
b) For explicitly calling out Trump's literally Nazi rhetoric on the issue.
c) Reminding people that his predecessor threw little kids in cages.
The disruptors have mostly shut up, and Republicans are visibly stewing. They know he's hitting them hard.
11 notes · View notes
colorcodedbeanies · 1 year
Text
S2 E5-"Breakage
Sorry about the long posting gaps, new job+sick+RDR2+L+ratio etc. Favorite line from this episode is "why don't you stop being such a freak about everything" I think I should be paid to say that to Walt once an hour.
TW: Racism, police brutality, addiction, alcoholism
Tumblr media
So I've always been really unsure what to make of the cold opening of the two illegal immigrants crossing the Rio Grande. With the analytic frameworks I've applied until this point I think I'm choosing to understand it as complicating the idea that violence is sneaking up into the US across the Mexican border. Two scared, shivering men cross the river, and on the other end find an artifact of state-sanctioned violence. It never had to be imported from "lawless Mexican hell", as Marie describes it. We grow it just fine right here.
The cigarettes Walt finds jammed in the toilet act in visual parallel to Jesse's meth that he tried to flush down the toilet last season. The scene where he confronts Skyler about them is chockful of hypocrisy. Smoking while pregnant is bad for the baby's health. So is being a meth dealer trading with people who will shoot your whole family. Beyond that, though, there's one line from Skyler that stands out to me: "I'm sure you'll be very glad to hear that yes, I feel ashamed." She's accurately calling out what Walt's actual priority is. It's not determining the health of their child, or trying to help her so she doesn't feel the need to seek out a narcotic to cope. It's punishing her for needing an escape in the first place. Exactly the attitude he spends all of last season directing at Jesse.
Speaking of more socially acceptable addictions. I have never once seen anyone draw a connection between the fact that Walt cooks meth and Hank brews beer. Both manufacture substances that have heavy ties with addiction, and that can destroy lives. Both seem to seek out the crafting process as an escape from their day to day stress (Hank taking a day off to try and self-therapize with it). Only difference is Hank operates under the banner of legality, something the two of them talk about indirectly in 1x07.
We're getting in this episode to how Walt tends to mythologize the brown men around him into figures of ultimate violence, but also ultimate power. His disdain for Tuco is pretty explicitly racialized when he disparagingly asks Jesse if "you['re] gonna beat your 'homies' to death when they 'diss' you?" However, later in this episode he criticizes Jesse for not being ENOUGH like Tuco. "You think Tuco had 'breakage'? I guess that's true. He broke bones." This is of course, factually inaccurate. Beyond what we see in BCS that establishes Tuco had some clear problems in his organization that went way beyond some product theft, it's also just actually impossible to run any kind of business without experiencing any kind of skimming. Like Jesse says, J.C. Penney's gets breakage. How much more so when you're dealing with a substance that inherently manufactures dependence? None of those realities matter to Walt, though, who is chasing after his idea of what a kingpin is like. Tuco doesn't live on in his memories as a unstable guy with an uncle he looks after and poor long-term planning. Instead, he's transformed into an unstoppable killing machine, brutal and (you should read the full racial implications into this word) savage, but also untouchable. The kind of man Walt secretly longs to be and is currently using Jesse as a proxy to try to achieve
This is further doubled down on when, after an argument with Skyler where Walt feels unmanned by his inability to control his wife's behavior, he goes right to Jesse's house and demands he take care of business. Its him trying to imitate Tuco again, though this time not by his own hands.
Jesse is also doing some imitation here. It's not Tuco he acts like at the meeting though. It's Walt.
Hank can't glorify the Tuco fight with his usual bravado. He can, however, provide unique insight into a cop's view of a criminal when he describes them as functionally subhuman. Cockroaches. Your first instinct is to step on them. Drug dealers, addicts, gangsters, Mexicans they aren't people like you and me. If you saw one, you would immediately know you had to crush it to preserve yourself. This is going to get sooooo beautifully subverted next episode.
The Skyler-Marie conflict continues to act in parallel to the Skyler-Walt conflict, with Skyler refusing to proceed until Marie does her the basic service of respecting her with the truth. Marie tantrums like Walt does, asking "why are you punishing me" and seemingly frustrated that the consequences can't just evaporate because she doesn't want to deal with them. At the end of the day though. The distinction is that Marie loves her sister more than her pride. Walt...remains to be seen.
57 notes · View notes
marinaiguess · 10 months
Text
if you wanna know about what happened to that sunken ship carrying 750 immigrants (of which around 100 survived), i can tell you but i cannot promise you i can keep my cool.
i’m gonna start biting ohmygosh okay. 
immigrants. refugees is probably the better word. those people took a ship from libye heading to italy. they were trying to leave their country to go to a better place, right? to live under better conditions. but you cannot do that “legally”. i hope you know how it goes. people from that area would travel on road, from turkey and then from greece to wherever they wanted to go. but as of recently, right at the borders of greece and turkey there was a wall built (wish this was a bad joke) by the greek government. the reason: to deter immigrants to pass the borders (since there are a lot of them in our country but that’s no fucking excuse since the EU literally funds the governement for this). and it worked, unfortunately. 
refugees had to find a different means to leave. so? travel overseas. it’s riskier but when you have no other option left, you take what you have. and it’s not the first time this has happened. it’s not the first time refugees have drowned and their bodies were found in greece’s coasts. we’ve mourned many people, many children. 
this time? this time it was different because this is the biggest ship the greek government has ever found “trespassing” their sea borders. (there could be others that were never found you know). the biggest ship with the most people on it. never before have there been 750 people abroad. and never before has a ship like that sunken. 
so what happened? based on what i know and not what the greek media claims, based on the survivors’ and the residents’ claims, the coastguard sinked that overcrowded fishing boat. yeah you heard me right. they towed their ship to that boat, probably in hopes to get it out of the greek sea borders so that malta would have to deal with it. malta’s sea borders weren’t that far away and keep in mind that towing in this case is illegal because it could be fatal (and it was).
so, the coastguard firstly claimed that they hadnt approached the boat until it was near sinking. after the survivors’ spoke their truth, they had to change their initial statement. and they did that quite fast. they said they approached them hours before it sunk in order to maintain their safety and supply the boat with food and water. according to them, the reason why the boat sunk was due to the people who were moving too much and tried to shake off any help given to them. it was dark and it wasn’t windy, no waves big enough to disrupt the boat. 
the greek authorities have lied, twice now, and their claims oppose those of the survivors’. survivors who lost their parents or their children. because governments make their lives harder and harder and when the people try to escape their fate, they realize they dont have the upper hand on the matter. and those humans who dont deserve to be called that, act like they care, announcing a 3-day national mourning. that happened a week ago. i havent seen any government officials talking abt the matter since then. (and ofc the only reason they pretend they care so much is because it’s elections season)
i am so done with the hypocrisy. we know the truth and we want justice to be served. but i really really wish it hadnt come down to this, i wish we didnt have to mourn for all the lost ones.
it isn’t the first time it happened. it isn’t the first time in this year that we have lost people thanks to our government’s incompetency. im tired of this. and im tired of people who vote for them, who back them up and excuse their actions. my heart hurts. it really does. as a kid of immigrants who had to go through hell to move across countries, who risked their lives to have a chance of living peacefully and under better conditions, it hurts. and it hurts even more to know that even if there’s a very very very slight possibility jsutice will be served, those people will never be the same again. justice wont be enough to bring their loved ones back. it fucking hurts. 
25 notes · View notes
mightyflamethrower · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
When the progressive woke revolution took over traditional America, matters soon reached the level of the ridiculous.
Take the following examples of woke craziness and hypocrisy, perhaps last best witnessed during Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution.
The Biden administration from its outset wished to neuter immigration law. It sought to alter radically the demography of the U.S. by stopping the border wall and allowing into the United States anyone who could walk across the southern border.
Over seven million did just that. Meanwhile, Biden ignored the role of the Mexican cartels in causing nearly 100,000 ANNUAL American fentanyl deaths.
Then border states finally wised up.
They grasped that the entire open-borders, “new Democratic majority” leftwing braggadocio was predicated on its hypocritical architects staying as far away as possible from their new constituents.
So cash strapped border states started busing their illegal aliens to sanctuary blue-state jurisdictions.
Almost immediately, once magnanimous liberals, whether in Martha’s Vineyard, Chicago, or Manhattan, stopped virtue-signaling their support for open borders.
Instead, soon they went berserk over the influx.
So now an embarrassed Biden administration still wishes illegal aliens to keep coming but to stay far away from their advocates—by forcing them to remain in Texas.
That means the president has redefined the US. border. It rests now apparently north of Texas, as Biden cedes sovereignty to Mexico.
Precivilizational greens in California prefer blowing up dams to building them.
They couldn’t care less that their targeted reservoirs help store water in drought, prevent flooding, enhance irrigation, offer recreation, and generate clean hydroelectric power.
Now an absurd green California is currently destroying four dams on the Klamath River. In adding insult to injury, it is paying the half-billion dollar demolition cost in part through a water bond that state voters once thought would build new—not explode existing—dams.
The Biden administration is mandating new dates when electric vehicles will be all but mandatory.
To prove their current viability, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm led a performance art EV caravan on a long road trip.
When she found insufficient charging stations to continue her media stunt, she sent a gas-powered car ahead to block open charging stations and deny them to other EVs ahead in line.
Only that way could Granholm ensure that her arriving energy-starved motorcade might find rare empty charger stalls.
In some California charging stations, diesel generators are needed to produce enough “clean” electricity to power the stalls.
The state has steadily dismantled many of its nuclear, oil, and coal power plants. It refuses to build new natural gas generation plants.
Naturally, California’s heavily subsidized solar and wind plants now produce too much energy during the day and almost nothing at night.
So the state now begs residents to charge their EVs only during the day. Then at night, Californians may soon be asked to plug them in again to transfer what is left in their batteries into the state grid.
Apparently only that way will there be enough expropriated “green” electricity for 41 million state residents after dark.
One of the loudest leftist voices to defund the police, and decriminalize violent crimes in the post-George Floyd era, was Shivanthi Sathanandan, the 2nd Vice Chairwoman of the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.
She was recently not shy about defunding: “We are going to dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. Say it with me. DISMANTLE.”
But recently the loud Sathanandan was a victim of the very crime wave she helped to spawn.
Four armed thugs carjacked her automobile. They beat her up in front of her children at her own home, and sped off without fear of arrest.
The reaction of the arch police dismantler and decriminalizer on her road to Damascus?
The now bruised and bleeding activist for the first time became livid that criminals had taken over her Minneapolis: “Look at my face. REMEMBER ME when you are thinking about supporting letting juveniles and young people out of custody to roam our streets instead of HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.”
Andrea Smith was an ethnic studies professor  at the University of California, Riverside. But now she has been forced out after getting caught lying that she was Native American.
Prior to her outing, she was well known for damning “white women” (like herself) who opted to “become Indians” out of guilt, and (like her) for careerist advantage.
The common theme of these absurdities is how contrary to human nature, impractical, and destructive is utopian wokism, whether in matters of energy, race, crime, or illegal immigration.
There are two other characteristics of the Woke Revolution.
One, it depends solely on its advocates never having to experience firsthand any of the nonsense they inflict on others.
And two, dangerous zealots with titles before, and letters after, their names prove to be quite stupid—and dangerous.
Tumblr media
10 notes · View notes
bwhitex · 2 months
Text
Democrats Project
It is unmistakably clear that Democrats caution about the potential of a reelected Trump misusing the Department of Justice and FBI to target his adversaries. Yet, according to Davidson (2024), in his article, Democrats, not Trump or his supporters, are the real extremists, it is the Biden administration that, for the last three years, has been relentlessly pursuing Trump, his legal team, and adherents. The legal actions against Trump are a blatant use of the DOJ's power to subjugate a politically inconvenient former president.
This strategic misuse and abuse of power traces back to before Trump's ascension to the presidency. In the final phase of the Obama era, Democrats manipulated the FBI and intelligence agencies against Trump's campaign and persisted in their attacks post-election, sustaining the baseless Russia-collusion narrative with the help of an enabling mass media. It's the Democrats, not Trump, who are exploiting governmental apparatus to target their opposition.
The hypocrisy of the Democrats is pervasive. Cities were engulfed in flames during Black Lives Matter protests, yet these were dismissed as "mostly peaceful," while the full severity of the law was imposed on individuals who entered the U.S. Capitol on January 6, leading to over a thousand arrests and prosecutions on dubious grounds.
The recent arrest of Blaze Media's Steve Baker by the FBI underscores the duplicity. Democrats express indignation over Russia's arrest of a Wall Street Journal journalist while simultaneously endorsing the Biden administration's arrest of journalists on the conservative spectrum.
This pattern of deception is consistent across contentious issues. Democrats disseminate false information on Covid, then condemn contradistinctive perspectives and evidence as misinformation to be silenced by Big Tech. They label any challenge to their electoral narrative as "election disinformation."
Their tactics are universal. In the abortion debate, they advocate for late-term procedures and then disparage states that align with global norms for imposing restrictions. They support children's rights to irreversible gender-altering decisions, yet they criticize measures to restrict such practices as abusive. By allowing unrestricted entry across the southern border, they invite a deluge of illegal immigration, yet they attack those who declare a crisis and call for border security. They undermine law enforcement and decriminalize disruptive behavior, fueling a surge in theft and assault, and then brand calls for public safety as racially motivated.
The Democrats' positions on these issues are not just extreme; they are the very epitome of extremism. Their vocal condemnation of Trump and his supporters is directly proportional to their own radical agenda. Projection is their strategy, a simplistic rhetorical ploy designed to deflect attention from their actions. It is critical to see through this facade.
Davidson, J. D. (2024, March 5). Democrats, not Trump or his supporters, are the real extremists. The Federalist. https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/05/democrats-not-trump-or-his-supporters-are-the-real-extremists/
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
andysouldancer · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The *F* Word                                                                                                           I have repeatedly stated over the years that global politics has and still is moving more and more right wing. Events in this country continuously show this to be the case. But sadly too many do not notice or care to ignore this, I do not understand why...or perhaps I do ?                                                                          The thing is, as we move and to the right politically , politics and thus our country – the world we live in – can only end up in one place. I repeat my warning…      “We are reversing in to fascism !”                                                                           I will share Michael Rosen’s warning from a decade ago :                                    Fascism: I sometimes fear...      I sometimes fear that       people think that fascism arrives in fancy dress       worn by grotesques and monsters       as played out in endless re-runs of the Nazis.       Fascism arrives as your friend.       It will restore your honour,       make you feel proud,       protect your house,       give you a job,       clean up the neighbourhood,       remind you of how great you once were,       clear out the venal and the corrupt,       remove anything you feel is unlike you...      It doesn't walk in saying,       "Our programme means militias, mass imprisonments, transportations, war and persecution."                                The following is from the famous poster in the Washington Holocaust Museum, with notes by myself...                                                                                                       These are 14 early warning signs of fascism – it should concern each of us      1 - Powerful and continuing nationalism Just look at the attached photo, the primacy of the national flag, this is new in our political arena. Extolling the need for patriotism and calling thus who disagree, unpatriotic. The growing talk of the nation being alone and threatened. That our national problems were created outside the nation and national patriotism is fix them. (Rather than the truth that almost all this nations problems are self-inflicted!)      2- Disdain for human rights      Look at the campaign to leave the European Convention of Human Rights. New laws against protests and striking.       3- Identification of enemies as a unifying cause      A growing list, migrants, and ‘illegals’, to unions and strikers.       4- Supremacy of the military      The ‘sudden; need to increase ,military spending and upgrade equipment.       5- Rampant sexism     Where do we start, just look at their private behaviour never mind their lack of policies to support for woman and child care etc and the removing sexual discrimination rules.       6- Controlled mass media     Five oligarchs own and control 80% of the UK’s media. The Tory party has appointed it’s own supporters to important positions within the BBC….and it shows!      7- Obsession with national security      Our national security is under threat from ‘illegal’ migration, from Russia, from China, from the EU, from the unpatriotic left wing and those others who disagree the Tory view. Remember, striking nurse were helping Putin!      8- Religion and government intertwined      Though there are several religious zealots among the Tories. But this is the one area that does not stand out, where I feel things are not and will not happen. Their personal hypocrisy stand out so much as to undermine excessive religious influence. And then we have the example of Ulster as a warning to us.       9- Corporate power protected      Where do I start? Their simple reluctance to use a windfall tax on energy companies massive profits or failure to act against the profiteering that created these profits and the cost of living crisis, are the starkest examples of so, so many.      10- Labour power suppressed      The new anti-strike laws – enough said !      11- Disdain for intellectuals & the arts      “We’ve had enough of experts!” To quote a senior member of the Tories.       12- Obsession with crime & punishment      The new anti-protest laws and the desperation to leave the ECHR so they can take more and more draconian action, along with the new ‘Immigration Bill’.      13- Rampant cronyism & corruption      The massive PPE scandal is just the perfect and unavoidable example of so, so much that has gone on, the buying and selling of position and influence is becoming the norm.      14- Fraudulent elections      The need for voter ID in the coming elections because of half a dozen individual cases and the redrawing of boundaries in the Tories favour are reasons to worry, in an area I have never been concerned about before !                         Look around yourself, you are living in a right wing world. Our society is being run along a right wing lines. The bulk of our media supports a right wing agenda. We are governed by right wing politics and policies. Key, we have moved beyond right wing conservatism. We are in a phase of radical elitism driven by personal advancement and personal and corporate profit (greed). We are in an economy that is running society for the benefit of the few who can control the economy. Rather than for the benefit of all who are in both the economy and society in general. This is the right wing world we live in and it is going more and more to the right politically. This can only end in one place. We’ve been there before. With one political agenda.                                              One ideology.                                                                                                        Fascism !                                                                                                                   (sorry that the layout is a mess. Tumblr just wouldn’t load the ‘cut & paste’ as it was originally). 
4 notes · View notes