Fragmento-Dinâmica

Não há revisão as tuas sutilezas Um parir tênue de tensões O parir de um zoológico em cada gesto Não há tantos olhos assim para esculpir seu subtexto

Verter discursos como corrida de cavalos Cada olhar foste um diário de serpentes A céu aberto lobos dançam com cadeiras E nos convencem que cada rumor não tem sua influência

Tais mobílias coloquiais são objetos desgastados Provações tropicais em quatro cordas bambas Infiltra-se Babilônia por entre o ritmo dos suspiros Em terra sintética, todo silêncio é hostil

E todos valsam a música do anfitrião A duvidar de seus efeitos químicos Como um bom bailarino, atraindo sorrisos Tramando calmaria com sua língua de algodão

Há um ser híbrido que invade a pele Promove coices, confecciona pólvora E no segundo seguinte veste sua carapuça Onde muros e mísseis saltam pelos dentes

Ainda há um personagem que deseja Seus olhos se fragmentam em câmeras Barganham uma lança velada entre o carrossel Ele pôde nos afogar, mas ainda não o fez

A eterna compulsão, minha querida Ambientes que propositalmente prescrevem Ainda há um precipício escondido entre paladares Todo o resto atribuindo ao convencimento

É incondicional e bem regrado A recompensa se constrói em outros ritos A partir dos cavalos saltados, a aposta Desliza-se pela mesa untada de azeite

So are you one of those Western communists who assumes the USSR was great and that modern Russia is also awesome, purely because your own country is a capitalist hellhole, so it's enemies must be saints?

No my friend, I, like all Westerners, was raised to believe the USSR was a frigid starving 1984 hellscape.

I hope you will forgive the length of this, this is a good question prompt and I want to answer it as fully as I can. TLDR at bottom.

What very slowly changed my reluctant mind was slow exposure to the facts. I was a nerd and a sucker for dry information. I think this one simple study was pretty pivotal in my new understanding:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646771/

(The third page, labeled 663, has a very nice table that sums it up nicely)

Slowly over time I learned that the USSR had better life expectancy, nutritional intake, education, healthcare, real wages, democracy, mental wellness, social mobility, and even seemingly unrelated things like culture, interpersonal relationships, and sex, when compared to the U.S. and other peer capitalist nations. All in SPITE of their dire circumstances, and the many privileges of their capitalist bandit peers. More humane prisons, less drug addiction. A more efficient and ethical economy, better technological development. Incredible strides towards uplifting ethic and national minorities oppressed under the tsarist empire. Incredible strides towards gender equality.

I do not assume the USSR was great. The simple facts illustrate this. And, likewise, all socialist countries are far better in these critical metrics when compared to capitalist peers. China especially has taken these victories even further.

After the 1991 capitalist coup and the Union's dissolution, all of these metrics SHARPLY fell in the former Soviet states. Poverty, drugs, alcoholism. Life expectancy sharply fell. Depression and misery. Capitalist Russia, while it fared better than other countries in the Eastern Bloc and in Central Asia, was by every metric immediately worse compared to Soviet Russia.

Now, this is where it gets a little spicy: Russia today has slowly but surely returned some of these metrics to their prior status ever since Putin took power.

There is a lot of bad to say about Putin, particularly his queerphobia. However, in the 2 decades he's been in power, many social safety nets of Russia, many calcified remains of the Soviet bureaucracy that were being chipped away by capitalists have been preserved or even restored. Socially, things have continued to largely decline and become reactionary. But many ordinary people in Russia enjoy cushy, dignified lives, ESPECIALLY compared to American counterparts.

Modern Russia may be capitalist, and it may have some unsightly problems, but it is leagues better than the United States, and so yes, the fact that they foil the United States on a world stage is invaluable. Yes, I would support an equally evil country foiling the United States simply on virtue that the rise and fall of empires leaves lots of room for radical change, this is plain pragmatism. But I do not find the evils of Russia even remotely comparable to the evils of the U.S. I also strongly believe in the imminent leftward potential of Russia as a country that has a precedence, nostalgic reverence for and calcified remains of a socialist system, not to mention their burgeoning relationship with China only going to further disseminate socialist ideals to combat the Nazism that leaks in from the Baltic states.

Now, to speak on other countries briefly:

As I mentioned, I would indeed critically and pragmatically support almost any entity for the short term goal of toppling and containing the U.S. Empire. There are other clearly non-socialist states, movements, individuals and other entities I support in this World War against the U.S. I went from despising the Westernized monarchy Saudi Arabia as violent, arrogant vassal of the United States to celebrating their step towards peace with the theocratic Iran, both because I always enjoy peace-making but because I think Saudi Arabia would be an excellent turncoat despite how much I dislike them and nearly everything they do. In hindsight I flirt with enjoying the Trump presidency because I truly think it accelerated the rot that is destroying this Empire whereas another Obama would have prolonged it another cycle, even though Trump was and is a terrible person, especially in power. The fascist Taliban were created BY the United States to destroy socialist Afghanistan, and yet I pinch my nose and celebrate them retaking Afghanistan in lieu of the American occupiers because it is all part of the long bloody process that will lead to a socialist Afghanistan one day soon. I am well aware of the socially conservative and otherwise reactionary views of many who, even as Useful Idiots, will play a pivotal and passionate role in toppling the US hegemony.

Yes, it is a shame. No, it is not preferable. But I believe this World War and the process of geopolitical development is incremental. There will be new challenges that arise after the death of the US Empire, I would not be surprised if for a century after its death we were still dealing with Western Wokeism and the social conservatism it creates as reaction.

One problem at a time.

` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` `

TLDR:

I do not assume the USSR or, to a significantly lesser degree, capitalist Russia is better than the United States; the fact is they simply were and are, by every metric.

That being said, yes, I also critically support any enemy of the United States no matter how foul, because quite simply that is the logic one must follow to win a multi-faceted war against a powerful mutual enemy such as this. I also have faith that as the US Empire dies that the natural tendency of societies to become more progressive will resume, as the US suppressed all leftward movement across the world for 30 years straight, yet the second they began losing their grip we've seen a damaged and distorted but always still alive Left resume its inevitable march in non-Western countries across the world. The big tent zero-standards anti-imperialism of today will, after more conflict and reassessment and redevelopment, become the pro-socialism of tomorrow, especially with China as the new most powerful country.

🇵🇸📰 Anúncio de página inteira no New York Times de hoje.

“Se eu morrer, lembre-se que eu, nós, éramos indivíduos, humanos. Tínhamos nomes, sonhos e conquistas, e nosso único defeito foi termos sido classificados como inferiores.”

🔴 @DDGeopolitics

North Korea is into it with South Korea. The US is involved with that.

China and Taiwan are at odds and on the edge of war. The US is involved with that.

There's trouble in the middle east with this Israel and Hamas war. The US is involved in that.

Russia and Ukraine are yet at war. The US is involved in that. In fact, the US's role in the Russia and Ukraine conflict has given much fuel to BRICS' (Brazil Russia India China South Africa) dedollarisation international campaign.

It's so much that can further be said, even the fallen, backslidden state of the Church all adds to the signs of the time. The world is heading towards a new horizon that won't be sunny.

Just as John the Baptist was given to go before the Savior to "make his paths straight," the same has strongly been taking place to precede "the man of sin" that is to come upon the world stage. There is a strong antiChrist spirit within both the world and right in the midst of Churches today. . . When we're caught up with the lust of the flesh, lust of the eyes, or pride of life, we're oblivious to all the signs, sirens, and warnings that alarm to cause us to be prepared or flee because we're either not sober spiritually or spiritually in darkness. So much more can be said. If there ever was a time to get serious about God, nowd the time. Don't further put him off. 🙏

You get ready for war in a time of peace, and the warfare in this sense is spiritual . . . Be alarmed

📜‭‭Matthew‬ ‭24:3‭-‬6‬

[3] Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” [4] And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you. [5] For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many. [6] And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.

📜‭‭II Thessalonians‬ ‭2:3‭-‬4‬, 7-11

[3] Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition, [4] who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God.

[7] For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way. [8] And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming. [9] The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, [10] and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. [11] And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, [12] that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

📜‭‭II Timothy‬ ‭3:12‭-‬13‬

[12] Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. [13] But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived

"De todas maneras creo que si fuera cineasta me las arreglaría para cazar crepúsculos, en realidad solo un crepúsculo, pero para llegar al crepúsculo definitivo tendría que filmar cuarenta o cincuenta porque si fuera cineasta tendría las mismas exigencias que con la palabra, las mujeres o la geopolítica."

(J. Cortázar, Cazador de crepúsculos)

Como Elaborar uma Avaliação Diagnóstica Eficiente de Geografia

A avaliação diagnóstica em geografia transcende a simples mensuração; ela se apresenta como uma bússola guiando o caminho da jornada educativa. Este processo não apenas avalia, mas também informa e molda o ensino de geografia, integrando-se profundamente no ciclo de aprendizado. 

Através dela, somos capazes de compreender não só o que os alunos sabem, mas como eles pensam e se relacionam com o mundo geográfico ao seu redor. Conforme destacado por Philippe Perrenoud, a avaliação por competências, que é contínua e diagnóstica, permite uma avaliação mais holística das competências técnicas dos alunos.

Isso se alinha perfeitamente com os desafios e necessidades do ensino de geografia, uma disciplina que requer não apenas conhecimento factual, mas também a habilidade de aplicar esse conhecimento de maneira crítica e reflexiva. 

Além disso, a avaliação diagnóstica em geografia proporciona uma oportunidade única para que os educadores adaptem suas metodologias e conteúdos às necessidades específicas de seus alunos, conforme destacado em estudos sobre as metodologias de avaliação na disciplina de geografia. 

Este ajuste direcionado não só melhora a eficácia do ensino, mas também aumenta o engajamento e o interesse dos alunos pelo tema. Portanto, neste artigo, exploraremos como realizar uma avaliação diagnóstica eficaz em geografia, enfatizando sua importância não apenas como uma ferramenta de avaliação, mas como um elemento essencial no desenvolvimento de um ambiente de aprendizado rico e adaptativo. 

Abordaremos estratégias práticas, integrando tecnologia e feedback construtivo, para transformar os desafios da avaliação em oportunidades de crescimento, tanto para alunos quanto para professores.

Ainda não acabou... leia o artigo completo no blog, deixe um comentário lá, sua participação é muito importante!

¿Galápagos entre jaque o mate?

Por Juan J. Paz-y-Miño Cepeda

Las islas Galápagos son famosas en todo el mundo. Aún quienes no las han visitado conocen sobre su fauna y las asocian a Charles Darwin, quien las visitó en 1835 y realizó allí las investigaciones que le permitieron formular su teoría sobre el origen de las especies. No todos saben que pertenecen a la República del Ecuador, que fueron descubiertas por Tomás de Berlanga en 1535 y que fue Juan José Flores, el primer presidente en la historia republicana del país, quien tomó posesión soberana de las islas el 12 de febrero de 1832. Las Galápagos comprenden 13 grandes islas, 9 medianas y más de 100 islotes. Desde la época colonial fueron usadas por piratas, cuya historia la rescata Sebastián Donoso Bustamante en su libro Piratas en Galápagos: 1680-1720. Algunos colonos que se establecieron en el siglo XVII se interesaron en la explotación de grasas y aceites. Entre mitos y exotismos, las islas siguieron aisladas. Pero desde Darwin, la presencia inglesa marcó sus nombres, pues cada isla tuvo alguno que se conservó largamente (Albemarle, Narborough, Indefatigable, James, etc.), hasta que se impusieron las denominaciones nacionales (Isabela, Fernandina, Santa Cruz, San Salvador, etc.). A comienzos del siglo XX el colono Manuel Julián Cobos, considerado el “emperador” en Galápagos, estableció un ingenio azucarero. También existió una colonia penal. Hoy el Archipiélago constituye una provincia, con administración especial, crecida población y cuya base económica es el turismo, que el Estado ha procurado controlar. La Unesco declaró a las islas como Patrimonio Natural de la Humanidad (1979), aunque tiene altos riesgos medioambientales. Las alejadas islas Galápagos y su casi nula significación económica para los gobiernos del Ecuador en el siglo XIX, hicieron pensar en la posibilidad de arrendarlas e incluso venderlas. También fue acusado de esa posición el caudillo liberal-radical Eloy Alfaro. Pero él mismo relata, en Historia del Ferrocarril del Sur, que en 1895, todavía como Jefe Supremo, recibió la propuesta de cinco millones de Libras Esterlinas por el Archipiélago, que rechazó; que en 1898 le ofrecieron 300 millones de francos por las mismas islas y que también lo rechazó; que, además, dio un informe reservado sobre ello al Congreso, que sirvió para acallar a los conspiradores que, sin embargo, continuaron oponiéndose al ferrocarril; y que nuevamente volvió a recibir ofertas sobre las Galápagos a fines de su segunda administración. En Consejo de Ministros se resolvió consultar en cada provincia la opinión de los “vecinos principales” y Alfaro pasó una circular a los gobernadores, en la que pidió: “Mi deseo sería, si fuera posible, oír la opinión de todos los ecuatorianos, á fin de proceder con el dictamen y acuerdo de las mayorías”, sin exceptuar á ningún partido político, para consultarles sobre el arrendamiento de las islas. Esa circular, dice Alfaro, incendió a los confabuladores, azuzados por la prensa de oposición. Sin embargo, Alfaro cortó todas las reacciones, aclarando que la supuesta negociación no se realizaría. “Con esta contestación de mi parte, se desatendió el Gobierno en el asunto arrendamiento; pero no así los opositores que siguieron propalando rumores falsos que favorecieran sus planes proditorios”. El Archipiélago, que siempre despertó el interés de Gran Bretaña y Francia, también estuvo en la mira de los Estados Unidos. En 1883 el Senado las consideró “tierra de nadie”; tras la construcción del Canal de Panamá fueron vistas como islas estratégicas para defenderlo; durante la I Guerra Mundial también fueron consideradas; en 1935 se pretendió la “internacionalización” de las islas bajo orientación monroísta; pero fue durante la II Guerra Mundial cuando manu militari los EE.UU. establecieron una enorme base en la isla Baltra, quedándose allí hasta 1948, aunque hubo, de por medio, un acuerdo reservado con el gobierno de Carlos Arroyo del Río; y durante la larga época de la Guerra Fría, bajo la ideología del americanismo, las Galápagos fueron, sin duda, una región geoestratégica para la posible defensa de la costa sudamericana del Pacífico. En tiempos contemporáneos ya no solo pesan los intereses geoestratégicos, sino el espíritu de los buenos negocios. La pesca ilegal, que pone en riesgo a Galápagos como patrimonio universal, resulta incontenible. El turismo, cada vez masivo, también tiene riesgos. Y, sin duda, el interés por explotar recursos o extender infraestructuras y construcciones. Es un tema complejo, que requiere de la decisiva imposición de políticas de Estado. Pero el asunto no funciona como el ideal busca. Durante el gobierno de Lenín Moreno (2017-2021) se denunció la posibilidad de convertir nuevamente al Archipiélago en una base de acceso militar para los EE.UU., algo que no se aclaró totalmente (https://bit.ly/2KrfCMJ). Su sucesor, Guillermo Lasso, expidió el 9 de mayo (2023) el Decreto 735 con cuatro páginas de “Considerandos”, en los cuales se argumenta y justifica, que “se contempla el establecimiento de la corporación sin fines de lucro ¨GALAPAGOS LIFE FUND¨ (GLF), cuyo objeto es promover el mantenimiento, crecimiento y seguridad del capital natural de las Islas Galápagos y sus ecosistemas marinos mediante la concesión de subvenciones o la financiación de proyectos de organizaciones, agencias gubernamentales y otras entidades para proyectos medioambientales y de desarrollo sostenible pertinentes, teniendo en cuenta cuestiones de biodiversidad, sociales, económicas, de sostenibilidad y de cambio climático y pignorando activos para garantizar préstamos y otras obligaciones en apoyo de dicho propósito, en cumplimiento del marco normativo nacional”. Se crea un Directorio, en el que participan 4 ministerios y el Consejo de Gobierno de Galápagos, que decidirá sobre el uso de los “Fondos de Cooperación” destinados al GLF.   Pero ha sido el blog JACOBIN, el que ha puesto una alerta al Ecuador y al mundo (https://shorturl.at/pquA7). De acuerdo con el artículo de Justin Villamil, Ecuador reduce la deuda en mas de mil millones de dólares y proporciona alrededor de $12 millones al año para los esfuerzos de conservación en Galápagos, así como $5,4 millones adicionales para generar una dotación permanente, todo durante los próximos dieciocho años. Un asunto que luce “histórico” y loable. Pero agrega el autor que los detalles son menos halagüeños: los fondos de conservación serán gastados por un fideicomiso especial llamado Galapagos Life Fund, una compañía de responsabilidad limitada registrada en Delaware, dirigida por once directores: cinco del gobierno de Ecuador y seis externos. Y Villamil anticipa su conclusión: “Ecuador ha cedido el control soberano de las Islas Galápagos a un fideicomiso independiente con sede en los Estados Unidos”. En forma apresurada, el gobierno, a través de la Secretaría de Comunicación, ha tenido que salir a defender el fideicomiso y atacar las críticas, centrando su argumento en que Ecuador no ha cedido ningún tipo de control sobre la soberanía nacional de las Galápagos; que GLF es una “entidad privada”, cuyas inversiones provienen de fundaciones y no de fondos públicos; que en el Directorio hay 8 nacionales y 3 extranjeros; y que el fondo queda “fuera de influencias políticas” (https://shorturl.at/cMSU9 // https://shorturl.at/arCJN). Admitiendo la aclaración, la transparencia no está garantizada y mucho menos en una entidad privada que se superpone a las capacidades del Estado y su obligada institucionalidad. ¿Qué pensar sobre un fideicomiso constituido en Delaware, Estado considerado como “paraíso fiscal” (https://shorturl.at/epx24)? La posibilidad de que esta tendencia y la orientación económica “libertaria” y empresarial cambien en agosto de 2023, gracias a las elecciones forzadas por la “muerte cruzada”, es un asunto incierto.

Blog del autor: Historia y Presente www.historiaypresente.com

How the age of crises affects globalisation

Society must set itself on the path to peaceful coexistence and co-operation, to repair the social and economic damage of the past three decades, according to Social Europe.

Hyperglobalisation is no longer relevant. The commercial confrontation between the US and China, followed by war in Ukraine and, in October, the Middle East, has been exacerbated by ever-increasing inequality and wage stagnation, which has led to populist reactions in advanced economies and the rise to power of illiberal regimes in many developing countries.

Even the most vocal supporters of globalisation now argue that it has brought unfair benefits, and that the threats that became apparent during the pandemic and the collapse of supply chains do not justify lax regulation and low labour costs.

The outlook for the global economy has no clear horizon. In the United States, the Joe Biden administration is course correcting, seeking to ensure economic security at home while trying to maintain global supremacy. Many other countries are following the same approach and now see bilateral relations as essentially a zero-sum game. Geopolitical supremacy means that trade wars and economic sanctions can become a permanent feature of international trade and finance, Social Europe reports.

Read more HERE

En el trasfondo del conflicto, persistente entre Israel y Hamas, un complejo entramado de apoyos internacionales que moldean la dinámica de la guerra. Desde aliados tradicionales hasta nuevas alianzas en el mundo árabe, las fuerzas detrás de cada bando delinean un mapa geopolítico intrigante.

Conferencia: Descolonización, Geopolítica y Pluriculturalidad

MAPAS DE #UCRANIA SITUACION MILITAR 20.5.23 #BAKHMUT al fin caído #RUSIA controla todos los barrios

Todo aqui http://actualidadbelica.ml/ COLABORAR vía PayPal https://paypal.me/Leuful via Patreon https://www.patreon.com/TruthMaps via CAFECITO https://cafecito.app/actualidadbelica via MercadoPago: https://bit.ly/3FsUrmC Suscripcion Mensual MP: https://bit.ly/2TI8GRd via Bitcoin Wallet 13VquA5dpG3jjuqQrgHp4zZ7zsLHcT792K via LemonCash Leuful.LEMON Siguenos: https://twitter.com/lwkax86 https://twitter.com/KlaussThomas https://www.fb.com/truthmaps http://www.truthmaps.ml https://actualidadbelica.tumblr.com/ CANAL DE NOTICIAS EN TELEGRAM DIA A DIA: https://t.me/actualidadbelica COLABORA CON NOTICIAS o COMUNICATE CON NOSOTROS https://t.me/actualidadbelicachat PROX DIRECTO @actualidadbelica3197 https://www.youtube.com/@actualidadbelica3197 #Ucrania #Rusia #Siria #Iraq #Iran #Yemen #libya

Ualid Rabah, presidente da Federação Árabe Palestina.

William Ruto waiting 85 million dollars from European Union to help Somalia

AMLO waiting 40 million dollars from United States to help Center America

it sounds so familiar 😑😒🙄

O Mundo em Colapso 5

O mundo segue no seu ritmo em direção ao colapso total. Os líderes mundiais continuam sua saga doentia na destruição dos valores sociais. Até quando?

 À medida em que os meses avançam neste ano de 2023, os eventos que se sucedem seguem apontando para o inexorável colapso mundial ao qual estamos nos encaminhando, ao invés de indicar um eventual retorno no sentido contrário. A novidade destes últimos dias foi o lançamento do relógio da contagem regressiva pelo Rei Charles III da Inglaterra, junto com o prefeito de Londres, Sadic Khan, que é um…

View On WordPress

@QudsNen: Um vídeo de #UNGA78 mostra que a maioria dos participantes deixou o salão assim que o primeiro-ministro de Israel do #Apartheid, Benjamin Netanyahu, iniciou seu discurso…

@guardian: ‘Um universo oculto de sofrimento’: as crianças palestinas enviadas para a prisão…

“❀ #FreePalestine ❀ •❁🇵🇸🍉🗝❁ •”

Palestina 01

Palestina 02

#Group4Palestine ✌️✌️✌️✌️

Notícias 🗞🗞🗞🗞

Linkedin 👁🔗

Arquivo - Tumblr 👁🔗

Casa Da Cidadania 🍀🍀🍀🍀

Pag. Telegram 🔗

Grup. Telegram 🔗

Whatsapp 🍀 🔗

✌️✌️✌️✌️