#elena rotenberg
Text
from elena rotenberg’s porcelain figurines series
0 notes
Text
elena rotenberg
#quayrund#art#Illustration#design#graphic design#photography#vibe#core#Aesthetic#cute#Mood#moodboard#esoteric#magic
30 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Selected paintings by Elena Rotenberg https://www.thisispaper.com/mag/selected-paintings-by-elena-rotenberg
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
adrian: tomorrow’s garbage day.
elena: wow! i can’t believe they have a whole day dedicated to you.
0 notes
Text
Elena Panina was amazed at the claims of the Baltic countries on human rights
The desire of the Baltic countries and Poland to act as guardians of human rights can only cause amazement, since it is there that the most real political repression and persecution of freedom of speech have been going on for many years, says Elena Panina, a member of the State Duma’s international affairs committee.
Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland draw up their own sanctions list of persons who, in their opinion, are responsible for the arrest of Alexei Navalny upon his return to Russia and the sentencing of him, the Lithuanian Foreign Ministry said earlier.
In an interview with RIA Novosti, Panina noted that such actions are quite natural, since the ruling circles of these particular countries have long turned into a kind of “watchdog” of the collective West.
The politician also noted that it is in one of these countries – Estonia – that the fugitive Russian businessman Sergei Kolesnikov is “based”, who appeared in Navalny’s film about the “palace” in Gelendzhik as one of the main “witnesses.”
According to the parliamentarian, it was he who “the inventor of the odious fake” about the “palace in Gelendzhik”, which served as a source of “creativity” for the notorious film by Navalny. Back in 2010, Kolesnikov sent a letter to then-president Dmitry Medvedev, in which he claimed that a “recreation complex” of Vladimir Putin was being built on the Black Sea coast. This statement was denied by Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov in the same year.
“In general, the striving of the Baltic countries and Poland to act as guardians of human rights can only cause amazement. In all these states for many years there have been real political repressions, persecutions of freedom of speech, witch hunts. It is not surprising that their representatives are used for the most aggressive and boorish attacks against Russia “, – stated Panina.
Businessman Arkady Rotenberg earlier said that he is the beneficiary of a complex of buildings in the Gelendzhik area, on Cape Idokopas, and the “palace” belongs to him, work on creating an apart-hotel there has been going on for several years.
Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that he had not watched the film about the “palace” in Gelendzhik, since he did not have time, but had flipped through the videos that his assistants brought him. He noted that none of the property from the “investigation” belonged or belonged to either him or his relatives. The press secretary of the head of state Dmitry Peskov noted that the Kremlin had known for a long time about the impending pseudo exposures and information attacks on the president, which are designed to rock the situation.
http://interkomitet.com/about-the-committee/blogs/elena-panina/elena-panina-was-amazed-at-the-claims-of-the-baltic-countries-on-human-rights/
0 notes
Photo
https://www.itsnicethat.com/articles/elena-rotenberg-art-200320
Elena’s fantastical creations are an absolute bundle of joy. “My interest in the ways that an image can shape an object or a space got me thinking about painted installations that interact with the viewer’s movement and vision,” she says of her future plans. “So my next projects are going to be site specific installations that communicate with the space and the viewers’ experience.”
Play between reality and none-reality - where does it begin and end?
1 note
·
View note
Link
Artist: Irma Blank
Venues: CCA, Tel Aviv; Bauhaus Foundation, Tel Aviv and in the city of Tel Aviv-Yafo
Exhibition Title: Irma Blank: Blank
Date: July 23 – October 10, 2020
Curated By: Johana Carrier and Joana P. R. Neves
Note: Hdjt Ljr can be heard here. Presented as a sound piece during the exhibition and performed as readings by Yasmin Caspin, Candida Gertler, Danielle Gorodenzik, Chaya Hazan, Zuzanna Jakvobowska, Luciana Kaplun, Fiammetta Martegani, Bekriah Mawasi, and Elena Rotenberg. Produced by CCA – Center for Contemporary Art Tel Aviv. Recording by Adam Scheflan.
Click here to view slideshow
Full gallery of images, press release and link available after the jump.
Images:
Images courtesy of the artist and P420, Bologna. Photos by Eyal Agivayev.
Press Release:
The work of German-born Italian artist Irma Blank (*1934, Celle, Germany; lives and works in Milan) associates writing and drawing in a unique manner, positioning her practice in a place that seems independent from any movement in art history. While the work maintains this distinctive position, it does share elements with the history of asemantic writing, Conceptual Art and visual poetry. Blank’s body of work formulates a profound reflection about existence through the paradox of a text without words and a language that is truly personal. Indeed, while one might consider Blank’s art as visual poetry, a closer examination unfolds a solitary quest, resulting in a place where she sees art as life, writing as breathing, doing as pausing.
This project is conceived as an unprecedented collaboration with six other institutions abroad and is encapsulated by a comprehensive catalogue. The presentation in Tel Aviv is showcased in three locations: CCA Tel Aviv, the Bauhaus Foundation, Tel Aviv and in the city of Tel Aviv-Yafo. The exhibition generates a format unlike that of the “traveling exhibition”; in fact, the reformulation of such notion implies the adaptation of Blank’s oeuvres to different contexts. Furthermore, the ambitious goal behind such a tentacular project is to unfold the artist’s cohesive practice, which is conceived through series across several years with media such as drawing, painting, bookmaking, installation, sound, and actions.
The presentation in Tel Aviv-Yafo focuses on the role played by immateriality, ephemerality and site-specificity in Blank’s modus operandi. Guided by conceptual and aesthetic choices, the exhibition features a selection of works from different series. It includes works on paper, an installation, several artist books, the reenactment of a historical action, a live performance and a sound piece. While at CCA Tel Aviv spectators will be able to experience works conceived through different media in a neutral space, at the Bauhaus Foundation, Tel Aviv visitors will have the unique opportunity to engage with Blank’s works on paper and books in juxtaposition with the Foundation’s permanent display of Bauhaus design prototypes and artifacts.
Irma Blank: Blank is curated by Johana Carrier and Joana P. R. Neves and is presented at CCA Tel Aviv, the Bauhaus Foundation, Tel Aviv and in the city of Tel Aviv-Yafo. The exhibition is accompanied by a comprehensive catalogue in English, edited by the curators, published by Koenig Books, London, on the occasion of Blank’s seven exhibitions at Culturgest, Lisboa; MAMCO, Genève; CAPC, Bordeaux; CCA and the Bauhaus Foundation, Tel Aviv; Museo Villa Dei Cedri, Bellinzona; ICA Milano; and Bombas Gens Centre d’Art, Valencia.
The presentation in Tel Aviv-Yafo, managed by Nicola Trezzi, Director and Curator, and Bar Goren, Assistant Curator, CCA Tel Aviv, is accompanied by a catalogue in Hebrew, Arabic and English and is supported by Luxembourg & Dayan, New York / London; ifa (Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen), Stuttgart; Invitro; P420, Bologna; Daniel Milman; and Istituto Italiano di Cultura, Tel Aviv.
Link: Irma Blank at CCA Tel Aviv
from Contemporary Art Daily https://bit.ly/3kgvm3V
0 notes
Text
The newest Supreme Court Justice is already alienating his colleagues — and it looks like it could get worse
There are signs of trouble in the relationship between Justice Neil Gorsuch and the rest of the Supreme Court.
One reporter noted that Gorsuch "ticks off some members of the court—and I don't think it's just the liberals."
Gorsuch has reportedly been battling Justice Elena Kagan.
Following his nomination to the Supreme Court, Neil Gorsuch was packaged by his wealthy benefactors as the judicial equivalent of a carrot cake: mild and wholesome with the occasional hint of spice.
Now that the justice has been safely installed on the court for life, he has revealed himself to be more akin to melted sorbet: sickly sweet and insubstantial with a tangy finish that induces slight nausea.
Gorsuch’s abrupt pivot to arrogance has been on full display in his bumptious opinions and questions from the bench. But it also appears to be infecting his interactions with justices behind the scenes. Whispers emerging from the court indicate Gorsuch is more likely to alienate than influence even his conservative colleagues.
The latest sign of trouble comes from NPR’s Nina Rotenberg, who dropped in on the indispensable Supreme Court podcast First Mondays to dish some gossip about the newest justice. Totenberg, a renowned court reporter who is friendly with several justices, noted that Gorsuch “ticks off some members of the court—and I don’t think it’s just the liberals.”
Without exposing her sources—“you talk to former law clerks, you talk to friends, you talk to some of the justices”—Totenberg then dropped a bombshell:
My surmise, from what I’m hearing, is that Justice [Elena] Kagan really has taken [Gorsuch] on in conference. And that it’s a pretty tough battle and it’s going to get tougher. And she is about as tough as they come, and I am not sure he’s as tough—or dare I say it, maybe not as smart. I always thought he was very smart, but he has a tin ear somehow, and he doesn’t seem to bring anything new to the conversation.
Why is Totenberg’s reporting here so extraordinary? Because it’s astonishing that any reporter would hear details from conference, let alone score some genuinely juicy scuttlebutt.
Conference is famously sacrosanct: It’s where the justices gather to cast their votes in the cases of the week, with each explaining his or her reasoning in order of seniority. Nobody else is allowed to attend. If rumors leak about a justice’s behavior in conference—and they basically never do—it is almost certainly a justice who leaked them.
And when justices leak—which again, happens very rarely—they do so on purpose. The fact that we know about the “battle” in conference between Gorsuch and Kagan suggests that someone on the court wants us to know.
The substance of the leak is also startling since conference is not intended to foster the kind of arguments that Totenberg described. Sixty years ago, some justices did engage in ferocious debate during conference.
But Chief Justice John Roberts, like William Rehnquist before him, prides himself on presiding over civil orderly discussions. By all accounts, Kagan has adhered to this tradition throughout her seven years on the bench.
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Gorsuch, it seems, has disrupted it. Is he needling Kagan to the point that she explodes? Or is he expounding his opinion so obnoxiously or condescendingly that she feels compelled to speak out?
A clue comes in the form of a recent article by CNN’s Joan Biskupic, another well-connected, widely respected Supreme Court reporter. Biskupic notes that Gorsuch has “shaken relations at the high court,” creating “personal tensions” at a formerly placid workplace. (The justices do get cranky toward the end of each term, and snippy at tense oral arguments, but they typically make up quickly.)
In one ambiguously sourced yet tantalizing passage, Biskupic confirms what the rest of us have long suspected—that Gorsuch is irritating his colleagues:
It can be difficult for people outside the marble walls to know truly the relationships among the nine in their private chambers. But word seeps out, through clerks and other staff, through the justices’ friends, and through the justices themselves. Such communications make clear that Gorsuch has generated some ill will among justices. Signs have emerged from the bench, too, as Gorsuch has been on the receiving end of a few retorts.
Kagan is cool-headed and pragmatic, but she does not suffer fools gladly. She does enjoy sparring with Justice Samuel Alito, but Alito is a brilliant intellect with a misanthropic wit.
Gorsuch, by comparison, is a Fox News anchor’s idea of a first-rate justice: an insipid ideologue peddling warmed-over dogmas. Kagan just might find him exasperating enough to merit a rebuttal, drawing her into the ongoing “battle” that Totenberg described.
We’ll get a better sense of this burgeoning feud once the justices begin issuing opinions later this term. (The ever-voluble Gorsuch will surely spill much ink detailing his penetrating insights and repudiating those who contradict him.) For now it is safe to say that, in Gorsuch, the justices did not get the deal they were promised.
Justice Antonin Scalia could be a grouch, but he developed warm friendships with many of his colleagues, including those to his left. Gorsuch is a pale imitation of his predecessor, boasting a bratty attitudethat has nettled justices across the ideological spectrum.
He was supposed to build a new conservative consensus. Instead, it seems, his unctuous demeanor has given his colleagues something they can agree on.
NOW WATCH: 6 airline industry secrets that will help you fly like a pro
from Feedburner http://ift.tt/2kZdIHf
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
bansheeshq
. · * home of the banshees !
looking-for-rabbits-is-my-habit
THE RABBITS HABIT
h0
love'll surely break your heart then set you free
gambiet
Unbetitelt
smiffyboi
Toaster Fucker 69