Tumgik
#dennis nilsen
prettyv1s1tor · 1 year
Text
Serial killers with animals
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
488 notes · View notes
morbidology · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
All throughout Dennis Nilsen's murderous rampage, he had one true companion - a dog named Bleep. She remained by his side throughout his brutal murders which took place in his apartment. On one occasion, she alerted Nilsen that one of his intended victims, Carl Stottor, was still alive. Bleep went over and licked Stottor and Nilsen decided he would revive him. 
When Nilsen was finally apprehended, Bleep was taken to Horney Police Station where Nilsen could hear her crying from his cell -  “I am ashamed that her last days should be so painful. She had always forgiven me everything.” 
Bleep was euthanized the following week.
226 notes · View notes
jackelated · 6 months
Text
I have watched 7 different things with David Tennant playing some kind of murderer
Edit: 9 now...
91 notes · View notes
edmndhpl · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Xp
34 notes · View notes
wrathofbloodeye · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
a letter from dennis nilsen to brian masters, 23 August 1991. as the two have similar components in their cases, nilsen provides his opinion on jeffrey dahmer’s motives and psyche.
Dear Brian,
Thanks for the (all too brief) visit. My first observation of D is that he had two primary social factors working against him. The first is that obviously recurring theme of being “a loner.” The second is that (to use the American phrase) he was born on the wrong side of the tracks. I guess that in his most early formative years his immediate household may have been female-dominated (with or without the presence of a passive male adult). As is often the case with serial killers “he always secretly wanted to be someone” as an adjunct to his lifelong world of fantasy (where he is already powerful and potent). In “real” society he feels that he is a dispensable “nobody” as insignificant as those whose remains adorn his private world (his apartment).
The dichotomy is that his power aspirations are not easily transferable into the real world because he has not been endowed with the overt powers of viable drive and ambition in interpersonal relationships in the real world. He achieves “sexual” fulfillment by acts of power of conquest to render the threatening potency of another man into the absolute and manageable state of passivity. He “fears” the potency of real men because he is by nature a wan and socially shy personality. His need for feelings of self-esteem are usually satisfied only in his fantasies (imagination) because he cannot garner such fruits from live people. He needs a totally unresisting, passive model of a human being in order to “cross the bridge” temporarily into “society.” (Being human he needs “fulfillment” in the human three-dimensional world of real flesh and blood.)
It is significant that a common view of the Stone Age depicts a potent male clubbing a sexually desirable female into unconsciousness and “wedding” her by an act of copulation with her passive body. Here we have the ingredients of power/violence rendering the desired person into a state of extreme passivity followed by sexual release for the conqueror. It is the opposite poles of gross action and gross passivity that attract. This is the constant in the serial-killing conundrum whether the victim is male, female or child. Dahmer’s “buzz” comes from the whole continuing ritual exploitation of the victim’s passivity. Each expressive sequence in the ritual gives sexual and self-esteemed satisfaction. It is a grossly perverted psychosexual act of copulation and like normal acts of copulation the satisfaction is of relatively temporary duration. The ejaculation is merely the biological release of inner pressure as is necessary for this human cycle of peaks and troughs.
D is buzzing with excitement and power (his heart rate is pounding at maximum speed) as he “lives out” his omnipotence. (It’s the only time in his life when he feels in his fantasies.) This is while he is stripping, washing and handling his unresisting spouse. These are all acts of possession and expression of extreme dominance. Perhaps subconsciously he is regressing back to his first (and only) memories of human touch, dependency, security and comfort. (As a very small boy being soiled, undressed, washed, powdered, dressed and “laid out.”) After this brief and early period of clear identity and security he drifts away into the wan growing little boy devoid of warmth, touch and comfort. As all humans will do if they cannot satisfy their needs in reality he has drifted to a substitute world where his imagination creates false fodder to feed his hunger. As conditioning advances he finds it less and less easy to relate to other people. Psychologically speaking Dahmer becomes both victim and predator (an easy accomplishment in one’s imaginary world). Brian, this is what you described in me as “virile male in performance and passive female in spirit” (an ungovernable mess of contradictions).
His unfolding aberration escalates in accordance with to what degree he is detached from reality (for example, what is termed NECROPHAGY is an extreme example of extreme detachment). This is manifested in “going all the way” in eating the heart of one’s victim/spouse. (If you have the power to eat a man’s heart this demonstrates your extreme power to possess and his extreme passivity.) The painting and display of the victim’s skull is a constant reminder of one’s potency.
The paradox is that D cannot hate his victims because his objective is achieved by exercising his will to sexual power and potency. The need is “love” for him and death for the hapless victim. Dahmer is “forced” to unnaturally seek to accede to the demands of his natural instinctive drives. He is perhaps partially aware that his “love” is really for himself or a created entity within his deranged personality. It seems clear that his personality will remain disordered in the absence of a self or presented therapy to help him come to terms with the engine of his acts.
P.S. I’m still in the dungeon.”
full source
249 notes · View notes
queerfordennis · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Drew Nilsen. Again.
18 notes · View notes
prettyhatetrentchine · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I love you so much David as Des, you are my emotional support 😭😭😭
19 notes · View notes
darkfantasies606 · 9 months
Text
I'm looking for roleplay parners
I have no triggers and will roleplay as most killers. no triggers except for needles, ask anything I will do it all no matter how bad. My personal favorite is Richard Ramirez, and Ted bundy. My snapchat is Pattoninsanity, and I am pansexual and agender neutral (he/her/they/it)
24 notes · View notes
lumpyorgan4799 · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media
Dennis Nilsen notes: 
“How to explain the irresistible compulsion to join the sea, to be part of it, to sink into the solace of its company? His mother would think him mad! A love for sea has never ceased to feed his imagination in the years since he left Scotland. “I am at one with visions of breaks in the dark wild sky,’ he writes. “With heavenly shafts of light searching the grumbling sea.” > pg. 51 || indicative of the SX instinct 
‘Dennis, however, rarely participated or joined in; still melancholic and drawn to the sea, he formed no close friendships with the children of his new neighbourhoods.’ 
‘He was, in the local word, a ‘Skowkie’ child, unsmiling and resentful of questioning adults, to whom he gave a clear impression of disgust and reserve.’ > 
Dennis confirmed that he felt cold towards the family  — there wasn’t anyone he had positive feelings for except for his grandfather. > 
‘In those days, I could hate my stepfather, Adam Scott very easily. I was, I suppose, very jealous of him having a relationship with my mother. 
‘I was a very lonely and turbulent child. I inhabited my own secret world full of ideal and imaginary friends. Nature had mismatched me from the flock.’ > Ni + enneagram image 4 + E5 influence 
In spite of Dennis having school-mates, he would often wander the fields and woods alone  — lost in his own thoughts and head. 
‘He felt inferior and ashamed; he did not dare approach him, but merely hovered in the playground watching him and trying to get near him, his legs quivering like jelly.”  > SO 4
‘He was a frail and skinny boy, very self-conscious, introverted, and shy’
. ‘then he must indulge his secret emotions in private, where the imagination rules  — not reality.’ > enneagram 5w4 
‘Dennis was aroused by the image of himself, but of himself only as a dead man. Love and death were becoming dangerously mingled in his mind, as he remembered the image of his adored dead grandfather.’ > image type 4 (idealism of own self). Quietly in the quarters of his mind, Dennis was dead, too. 
‘Dennis especially enjoyed the free ambiance of equality, which accorded well with his rapidly developing sense of idealism in political matters.’  
‘His mother recalls that he would stay up late listening to music and writing poetry. He was a moody uncommunicative stranger in the house.’ > strong BETA NF (EIE/IEI) 
‘So the endless search for companionship continued.’ > SX INSTINCT 
‘Motivated by a strong social conscience, he quickly became immersed in the task and it was not long until he was a branch secretary’ 
‘Work became an obsessive substitute for an empty life, and since he seemed unable to convey his concern for individuals in any way which they understood or could accept, he would devote his concern to the nebulous concept of mankind in general’. 
‘He was too keen, too impulsive, too angry; they wondered what deep irritations fed his manic eagerness.’ > high neuroticism (big 5) 
Dennis was no diplomat; he was impatient of the strategy whereby an important objective was attained by subtle means. > Te frustration 
in their view, he was volatile and excitable, and although they could not fault his work (indeed, he worked harder than most). 
He was not, and never would consent to be, submissive. On the contrary, he fought with ever increasing vigour to break, bend, or divert the rules which he seemed to think were being applied for his personal chastisement. > Enneagram 8 + Se (socionics) 
He was meticulously efficient and a workaholic 
his demeanour was confusing; he could be abrupt, short-tempered, impatient, and driven by a need to talk without pause, or even better to argue. He was passionate in debate. When aroused, he would be wonderfully sarcastic. On the other hand, he was at times docile, generous and kind. 
There were plenty of occasions when he generated real laughter. On the other hand, he was secretive and erratic. 
One of the most astonishing aspects of the case is Nilsen’s ability to go about his daily work with energy and enthusiasm, to go out for drinks, walk the dog, and even entertain people peacefully at his flat. All while there was a collection of bodies under his floor or cupboard. > low Si (socionics) 
29 notes · View notes
prettyv1s1tor · 1 year
Text
sweet innocent children
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
87 notes · View notes
Video
🤨❓
47 notes · View notes
sexydude228koridor · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
True Crime 🤠
25 notes · View notes
kissychan34 · 6 months
Text
Esta es mi cuenta de tiktok: kissy_chan34
Lastimosamente no lo van a encontrar ahí porque el tiktok no me lo deja poner por riesgo de no se que cosa pipipi :,<
Foto de mis reales,mi mejores amigos,amigos y yo:
Tumblr media
💔~~~CELOS Y RECHAZO~~~💔
7 notes · View notes
edmndhpl · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
17 notes · View notes
auburngods · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
i'm tired of this human duet, no civilising hides our animal impulses
205 notes · View notes
wrathofbloodeye · 1 year
Text
dennis nilsen letters: part two
Tumblr media Tumblr media
nilsen wrote to another unnamed penpal on september 4th, 2003. while the letter found in this article is seemingly ordinary, i think there are some interesting insights on his personality to consider throughout it.
he begins with his criticisms on the prison system’s procedures on receiving money. he then begins to talk about a documentary on myra hindley, who killed five children in england with her lover, ian brady.
“I watched the Channel Five documentary on Myra Hindley last night. One suspects that any programme with “Monster” in its title is not to be taken seriously as offering any new insight into the subject. TV journalism remains too set in its populist formulas. It revealed no new analysis or enlightening information. It hinged itself on that famous ‘demonic’ photograph of her taken at the police station. That saved millions the bother of ever having to think deeply about her ever again.”
this excerpt gives us insight on his opinions towards true crime material. in another letter circulating around, he writes to another person saying “my singular observation on crimes crackers is that they are mostly crackers.” i admit, i share the same opinion on the title of the documentary. the word monster is a reoccurring word in the titles of many serial killer documentaries and dramas. two examples would be the series invisible monsters: serial killers in america and monster: the jeffrey dahmer story. the use of the word can become overused and repetitive, which simplifies the unique details of an individual and their case.
my favorite part of this letter is towards the end.
“Scientists tell us that an asteroid might strike the earth on 21st April 2014. If I’m still around, I’ll look out for it as the end of the world is something not to be missed. Friendly greetings as always, Des. PS: What do you think of the new Bull Ring development?”
some of nilsen’s personality is revealed through these few lines. he seems quite pretentious even in his letters. not surprising, given his narcissistic personality disorder diagnosis. he is intelligent and provides thorough descriptions for his opinions (whether they make sense or not). and then he just out of nowhere, adds on something completely irrelevant and a little bizarre. seems like he had the attention span of a squirrel here, but it was probably just an attempt to make the recipient laugh. honestly, i found it amusing. it truly feels like you are reading the letter of a pretentious old man that likes to joke around.
i’m not sure if this next excerpt is from this same letter, but the article mentions it nonetheless, as it connects with earlier topics.
"I serve my time as an extreme example of human contradiction in the wide continuum of human nature and its actions. I am not contained, mute and immobile in a glass jar as some kind of eternal official specimen of popular 'evil'. As I am alive I must live as a man. I seek only to reach out to engage with the human dimension which is anathema to rigid officials of the retribution machine who are content with the official view of men like me as eternally and evilly sub-human and monstrous."
i believe he means he is a complex person who should not be simply categorized as evil, just as myra was. he deeply wants people to understand him less as a criminal and more as a person. he feels he is interpreted through a lens that ultimately deems him as evil, and that opinion is therefore passed on to others without further thought like a machine. des honey this is a difficult thing to ask for, since you killed multiple innocent lives.
i have two opinions about this that coexist, even though they are conflicting. this makes a lot of sense, while making no sense at all. his opinions and meanings are there, but it’s overshadowed by fancy syntax that does not always fit. especially that last run on sentence, as it takes him a long time to get to the point. he’s right about being contradictory- he desperately wants to be seen, but toys around with the idea more than outright demands it. his autobiography in its draft form included hours of tapes and 6,000 pages of notes. he forces people to understand him and will drag time out to do it. however, he is too high up on his own hill to level with everyone else.
his intentions may come in bits and pieces, but we may never have a clear understanding of who dennis nilsen truly was.
also, if anyone has a clear photo of the letter, feel free to share!
61 notes · View notes