#but it's funny bc i had no trouble accepting a Charr version of Dal when i made him in GW2
Text
....how different from the original can an AU of a character be. asking for a me
#missy rambles#im extremely predictable and my brain wants potential deathclaw oc to be an au of Dal#but. as a deathclaw. it feels too far removed from original Dal to be considered a version of him#but also even if it wasn't an AU of him. i'd still style the deathclaw after him a LITTLE bit#because Dal is an amalgamation of my favorite character tropes so they end up repeating + i wanna use the name Rex. maybe#so it's like...... i might as well! but it's not fitting in my head#i think it's because deathclaws aren't people. and it's not as simple as ''Dal as a Deathclaw''#like. i can do ''Dal as a dinosaur'' bc im not making lore for the dinosaur. it's temporary#''Dal as a dragon'' on FR has lore but is isolated. it's a fandragon and not really a character#but i'd want this oc to be a full Character#but it's funny bc i had no trouble accepting a Charr version of Dal when i made him in GW2#but again. Charr are people. Deathclaws are animals (that can be GIVEN intelligence. but it's not the same thing. not the same origin)#idk idk#i'll think about other names and maybe something else will crop up#Woman who's only made AUs of her OC for the past 12 years rather than New Characters voice: I could make a Dal outta this
5 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
pompeeeeeeiii
Untitled
fettiowi
Confetti circus
qqqqqqqqttttttt
Untitled
bara-du-des
bara dudes
floodtech
Flood Tech