Tumgik
#L. Kent Hollister
Photo
Tumblr media
Moby Grape, It's a Beautiful Day, and Sweet Rush at the Carousel Ballroom in San Francisco, CA on April 12 and 13, 1968.
Artist: L. Kent Hollister
99 notes · View notes
fugengulsen · 9 months
Video
youtube
Tumblr media
The Grateful Dead and a group of other rock bands of the times including the Jefferson Airplane, took a lease out on the old Carousel Ballroom on Market Street in San Francisco (formerly the El Patio) back in 1968 which only lasted for several short months. During that time however there were many great shows and dance/concerts that took place. Not to forget the ALWAYS great Tuesday night Jam Sessions for just a Buck! The posters that came out of that period at the Carousel were certainly some of the BEST of the times.  It was a Saturday night, back in 1968 that Moby Grape, along with It's a Beautiful Day and Sweet Rush started their two night engagement there at the Carousel Ballroom. The original poster is printed on white stock and measures only 8½" x 14½". A fairly small poster compared to many of the others at the time. It was printed only once and is quite difficult to find these days in any condition! The artist for this piece was L. Kent Hollister.
11 notes · View notes
gslocksmiths894 · 4 years
Text
Why You Should Hire Residential Locksmith Service
When people lock themselves out of their property or their vehicles the simple and easiest thing which they do is break the locks and get inside as soon as possible. At any point of time if you face such kind of situation then before doing anything .i.e. breaking the locks or banging at the door, instead of getting panic you should just take time some time out and look for the options which you have in your hand.
Think about what you can do in such a situation?
Whom you should approach?
What kind of people you should approach for help?
Hiring a locksmith who is specialized in offering locksmith and security service in USA should be your first option because of the following reasons:
For those who have just purchased a new commercial or residential property, it is important for them to change the locks. Providing a safe and comfortable environment for your employees and family members should be the main priority. For this purpose, you can hire the services of an experienced and professional locksmith.
You can get stuck in such kind of at any day and at any point of time and so it is important that you search for a locksmith service provider who is available 24*7
The professional and expert locksmith can give guarantee for the service to their clients so that they can feel safe and relax.
To hire the right people one of the best ways is to get a recommendation from family members, friends or neighbors.
Taking the service from a professional and expert locksmith will ensure that you get complete security.
They can easily install a high-security system in your office and home.
The type of locksmith service provider which you are planning to hire will decide the level of security that you will get. While the professionals and expert service providers can provide you with a high class of service at an affordable price, the inexperienced one will fail to do so.
They will not only open the lock but if you want them to make duplicate keys for your commercial or residential property or even for your vehicles they will easily offer you the service for that too and within a reasonable price.
They can fix the locks of any company and of any size.
With so many things and the different kind of service that a professional and experienced locksmith service provider can offer to you, you should always make an effort and hire them.
Find Locksmith Services in All Over USA:
Locksmith abilene
Locksmith akron
Locksmith Alameda
Locksmith albuquerque
Locksmith alexandria
Locksmith allen
Locksmith allentown
Locksmith amarillo
Locksmith anaheim
Locksmith anchorage
Locksmith ann arbor
Locksmith antioch
Locksmith apalachicola
Locksmith arcadia
Locksmith arlington
Locksmith arvada
Locksmith atascocita
Locksmith athens
Locksmith atlanta
Locksmith auburn
Locksmith augusta
Locksmith aurora
Locksmith austin
Locksmith bakersfield
Locksmith baltimore
Locksmith bartow
Locksmith baton rouge
Locksmith baytown
Locksmith beaumont
Locksmith bellevue
Locksmith berkeley
Locksmith billings
Locksmith birmingham
Locksmith blountstown
Locksmith boise
Locksmith bonifay
Locksmith boston
Locksmith boulder
Locksmith bradenton
Locksmith Brentwood
Locksmith bridgeport
Locksmith broken arrow
Locksmith bronson
Locksmith brooklyn
Locksmith brooksville
Locksmith brownsville
Locksmith bryan
Locksmith buffalo
Locksmith bunnell
Locksmith burbank
Locksmith bushnell
Locksmith cambridge
Locksmith Campbell
Locksmith cape coral
Locksmith carlsbad
Locksmith carrollton
Locksmith cary
Locksmith cedar park
Locksmith cedar rapids
Locksmith centennial
Locksmith chandler
Locksmith charleston
Locksmith charlotte
Locksmith chattanooga
Locksmith chesapeake
Locksmith chicago
Locksmith chipley
Locksmith chula vista
Locksmith cincinnati
Locksmith clarksville
Locksmith clearwater
Locksmith cleveland
Locksmith clovis
Locksmith college station
Locksmith colorado springs
Locksmith columbia
Locksmith columbus
Locksmith colusa
Locksmith concord
Locksmith conroe
Locksmith coral springs
Locksmith corona
Locksmith corpus christi
Locksmith costa mesa
Locksmith crescent city
Locksmith crestview
Locksmith cross city
Locksmith Cupertino
Locksmith dade city
Locksmith dallas
Locksmith daly city
Locksmith Danville
Locksmith davenport
Locksmith davie
Locksmith dayton
Locksmith defuniak springs
Locksmith deland
Locksmith denton
Locksmith denver
Locksmith des moines
Locksmith desoto
Locksmith detroit
Locksmith downey
Locksmith Dublin
Locksmith durham
Locksmith edinburg
Locksmith edison
Locksmith el cajon
Locksmith el centro
Locksmith elgin
Locksmith elizabeth
Locksmith elk grove
Locksmith el monte
Locksmith el paso
Locksmith escondido
Locksmith eugene
Locksmith euless
Locksmith eureka
Locksmith evansville
Locksmith everett
Locksmith fairfield
Locksmith fargo
Locksmith fayetteville
Locksmith fernandina beach
Locksmith flower mound
Locksmith fontana
Locksmith fort collins
Locksmith fort lauderdale
Locksmith fort myers
Locksmith fort pierce
Locksmith fort wayne
Locksmith fort worth
Locksmith fremont
Locksmith fresno
Locksmith frisco
Locksmith fullerton
Locksmith gainesville
Locksmith galveston
Locksmith garden grove
Locksmith garland
Locksmith georgetown
Locksmith gilbert
Locksmith Gilroy
Locksmith glendale
Locksmith grand prairie
Locksmith grand rapids
Locksmith grapevine
Locksmith greeley
Locksmith green bay
Locksmith green cove springs
Locksmith greensboro
Locksmith gresham
Locksmith hampton
Locksmith hanford
Locksmith harlingen
Locksmith hartford
Locksmith hayward
Locksmith henderson
Locksmith hialeah
Locksmith high point
Locksmith hillsboro
Locksmith hollister
Locksmith hollywood
Locksmith honolulu
Locksmith houston
Locksmith huntington beach
Locksmith huntsville
Locksmith independence
Locksmith indianapolis
Locksmith inglewood
Locksmith inverness
Locksmith irvine
Locksmith irving
Locksmith jackson
Locksmith jasper
Locksmith jersey city
Locksmith joliet
Locksmith jurupa valley
Locksmith kansas city
Locksmith kent
Locksmith key west
Locksmith killeen
Locksmith kissimmee
Locksmith knoxville
Locksmith labelle
Locksmith lafayette
Locksmith lake butler
Locksmith lake city
Locksmith lakeland
Locksmith lakeport
Locksmith lakewood
Locksmith lancaster
Locksmith lansing
Locksmith laredo
Locksmith las cruces
Locksmith las vegas
Locksmith league city
Locksmith lewisville
Locksmith lexington
Locksmith lincoln
Locksmith little rock
Locksmith live oak
Locksmith Livermore
Locksmith long beach
Locksmith longview
Locksmith los angeles
Locksmith louisville
Locksmith lowell
Locksmith lubbock
Locksmith macclenny
Locksmith macon
Locksmith madera
Locksmith madison
Locksmith manchester
Locksmith manhattan
Locksmith mansfield
Locksmith marianna
Locksmith Martinez
Locksmith marysville
Locksmith mayo
Locksmith mcallen
Locksmith mckinney
Locksmith memphis
Locksmith merced
Locksmith mesa
Locksmith mesquite
Locksmith miami
Locksmith miami gardens
Locksmith midland
Locksmith Milpitas
Locksmith milton
Locksmith milwaukee
Locksmith minneapolis
Locksmith miramar
Locksmith mission
Locksmith missouri city
Locksmith mobile
Locksmith modesto
Locksmith montgomery
Locksmith monticello
Locksmith moore haven
Locksmith moreno valley
Locksmith Morgan Hill
Locksmith Mountain View
Locksmith murfreesboro
Locksmith murrieta
Locksmith Napa
Locksmith naperville
Locksmith naples
Locksmith nashville
Locksmith nevada city
Locksmith newark
Locksmith Newark
Locksmith new braunfels
Locksmith new haven
Locksmith new orleans
Locksmith new york
Locksmith norfolk
Locksmith norman
Locksmith north charleston
Locksmith north las vegas
Locksmith north richland hills
Locksmith norwalk
Locksmith Novato
Locksmith oakland
Locksmith ocala
Locksmith oceanside
Locksmith odessa
Locksmith okeechobee
Locksmith olathe
Locksmith omaha
Locksmith ontario
Locksmith orange
Locksmith orlando
Locksmith oroville
Locksmith overland park
Locksmith oxnard
Locksmith Pacifica
Locksmith palatka
Locksmith palm bay
Locksmith palmdale
Locksmith Palo Alto
Locksmith panama city
Locksmith pasadena
Locksmith paterson
Locksmith pearland
Locksmith pembroke pines
Locksmith pensacola
Locksmith peoria
Locksmith perry
Locksmith Petaluma
Locksmith pflugerville
Locksmith pharr
Locksmith philadelphia
Locksmith phoenix
Locksmith Pittsburg
Locksmith pittsburgh
Locksmith placerville
Locksmith plano
Locksmith Pleasanton
Locksmith pomona
Locksmith pompano beach
Locksmith port arthur
Locksmith portland
Locksmith port st lucie
Locksmith providence
Locksmith provo
Locksmith pueblo
Locksmith punta gorda
Locksmith quincy
Locksmith raleigh
Locksmith rancho cucamonga
Locksmith red bluff
Locksmith redding
Locksmith Redwood City
Locksmith reno
Locksmith renton
Locksmith rialto
Locksmith richardson
Locksmith richmond
Locksmith riverside
Locksmith rochester
Locksmith rockford
Locksmith Rohnert Park
Locksmith roseville
Locksmith round rock
Locksmith rowlett
Locksmith sacramento
Locksmith saint paul
Locksmith salem
Locksmith salinas
Locksmith salt lake city
Locksmith san angelo
Locksmith san antonio
Locksmith san bernardino
Locksmith San Bruno
Locksmith san diego
Locksmith sandy springs
Locksmith sanford
Locksmith san francisco
Locksmith san jose
Locksmith San Leandro
Locksmith san luis obispo
Locksmith san marcos
Locksmith san mateo
Locksmith San Rafael
Locksmith San Ramon
Locksmith santa ana
Locksmith santa barbara
Locksmith santa clara
Locksmith santa clarita
Locksmith santa cruz
Locksmith santa maria
Locksmith santa rosa
Locksmith sarasota
Locksmith savannah
Locksmith scottsdale
Locksmith seattle
Locksmith sebring
Locksmith shreveport
Locksmith simi valley
Locksmith sioux falls
Locksmith sonora
Locksmith south bend
Locksmith spokane
Locksmith spring
Locksmith springfield
Locksmith stamford
Locksmith starke
Locksmith st  augustine
Locksmith sterling heights
Locksmith st  louis
Locksmith stockton
Locksmith st  petersburg
Locksmith stuart
Locksmith sugar land
Locksmith sunnyvale
Locksmith surprise
Locksmith susanville
Locksmith syracuse
Locksmith tacoma
Locksmith tallahassee
Locksmith tampa
Locksmith tavares
Locksmith temecula
Locksmith tempe
Locksmith temple
Locksmith the woodlands
Locksmith thornton
Locksmith thousand oaks
Locksmith titusville
Locksmith toledo
Locksmith topeka
Locksmith torrance
Locksmith trenton
Locksmith tucson
Locksmith tulsa
Locksmith tyler
Locksmith ukiah
Locksmith Union City
Locksmith Vacaville
Locksmith vallejo
Locksmith vancouver
Locksmith ventura
Locksmith vero beach
Locksmith victoria
Locksmith victorville
Locksmith virginia beach
Locksmith visalia
Locksmith vista
Locksmith waco
Locksmith Walnut Creek
Locksmith warren
Locksmith washington
Locksmith waterbury
Locksmith wauchula
Locksmith west covina
Locksmith west jordan
Locksmith westminster
Locksmith west palm beach
Locksmith west valley city
Locksmith wichita
Locksmith wichita falls
Locksmith willows
Locksmith wilmington
Locksmith winston salem
Locksmith woodbridge
Locksmith woodland
Locksmith worcester
Locksmith yonkers
Locksmith yuba city
1 note · View note
gerosarecords · 4 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Iron Butterfly Indian Head Band The Collectors Avalon Ballroom July 4-7, 1968 Artwork by Dottie The Youngbloods Santana It's a Beautiful Day Dog Avalon Ballroom June 28- 30, 1968 Artwork by David Warren and L. Kent Hollister Original double postcard @gerosarecords (at Gerosa Records) https://www.instagram.com/p/B8u5g1DpG2W/?igshid=1hgk2mbjh4vpv
0 notes
marymosley · 4 years
Text
New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion
New PatentlyO Law Journal article by Thomas F. Cotter, Taft Stettinius & Hollister Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Innovators Network Foundation Intellectual Property Fellow.  Professor Cotter is also the author of the Comparative Patent Remedies blog. 
Abstract: On August 11, 2020, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment in favor of the FTC. This essay argues that the Court of Appeals made two significant errors in its analysis. The first relates to the court’s failure to understand how Qualcomm’s conduct in the market for patent licenses affects competition in the complementary market for smartphone chips. The second concerns the court’s statement, at odds with the D.C. Circuit’s landmark decision in Microsoft, that if conduct “is not anticompetitive under § 1, the court need not separately analyze conduct under § 2.”
From the Introduction: 
On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc.[1] The opinion, authored by Judge Consuelo Callahan and joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Stephen Murphy III, reversed the district court’s judgment in favor of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).[2]  Whether the FTC will pursue any further relief, by way of a petition for rehearing en banc or for certiorari, remains (as of this writing) uncertain.  Regardless of whether it does or not, however, it is important to note two fundamental errors in the court’s analysis which, if not corrected or limited by subsequent case law, could lead to serious problems in future litigation.
Read Thomas F. Cotter, Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion, 2020 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2020).
Prior Patently-O Patent L.J. Articles:
Jasper L. Tran & J. Sean Benevento, Alice at Five, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 25 (2019) (Tran.2019.AliceatFive.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Implementing Apportionment, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 20 (Chao.2019.ImplementingApportionment)
Jeremy C. Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas?, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 10. (2019.Doerre.AnyNeed)
Colleen V. Chien, Piloting Applicant-Initiated 101 Deferral Through A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2019 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (2019.Chien.DeferringPSM)
David A. Boundy, Agency Bad Guidance Practices at the Patent and Trademark Office: a Billion Dollar Problem, 2018 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 20. (Boundy.2018.BadGuidance)
Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1.
Paul M. Janicke, Patent Venue: Half Christmas Pie, And Half Crow, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 13. (Janicke.2017.ChristmasPie.pdf)
Paul M. Janicke, The Imminent Outpouring from the Eastern District of Texas, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2017) (Janicke.2017.Venue)
Mark A. Lemley, Erik Oliver, Kent Richardson, James Yoon, & Michael Costa, Patent Purchases and Litigation Outcomes, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 15 (Lemley.2016.PatentMarket)
Bernard Chao and Amy Mapes, An Early Look at Mayo’s Impact on Personalized Medicine, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 10 (Chao.2016.PersonalizedMedicine)
James E. Daily, An Empirical Analysis of Some Proponents and Opponents of Patent Reform, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (Daily.2016.Professors)
Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. CLS Bank in Patent Examination, 2014 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (GrayLeCozDuan)
Robert L. Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf)
Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29.  (Morgan.2011.AIAAmbiguities)
Joshua D. Sarnoff, Derivation and Prior Art Problems with the New Patent Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 12 (sarnoff.2011.derivation.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Not So Confidential: A Call for Restraint in Sealing Court Records, 2011 Patently-O Patent Patent Law Journal 6 (chao.sealedrecords.pdf)
Benjamin Levi and Rodney R. Sweetland, The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Recommendations to the International Trade Commission (ITC):  Unsound, Unmeasured, and Unauthoritative, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (levi.ftcunsound.pdf)
Kevin Emerson Collins, An Initial Comment on King Pharmaceuticals: The Printed Matter Doctrine as a Structural Doctrine and Its Implications for Prometheus Laboratories, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 111 (Collins.KingPharma.pdf)
Robert A. Matthews, Jr., When Multiple Plaintiffs/Relators Sue for the Same Act of Patent False Marking, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 95 (matthews.falsemarking.pdf)
Kristen Osenga, The Patent Office’s Fast Track Will Not Take Us in the Right Direction, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 89 (Osenga.pdf)
Peter S. Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79
Donald S. Chisum, Written Description of the Invention: Ariad (2010) and the Overlooked Invention Priority Principle, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 72
Kevin Collins, An Initial Comment on Ariad: Written Description and the Baseline of Patent Protection for After-Arising Technology, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24
Etan Chatlynne, Investigating Patent Law’s Presumption of Validity—An Empirical Analysis, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 37
Michael Kasdan and Joseph Casino, Federal Courts Closely Scrutinizing and Slashing Patent Damage Awards, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24 (Kasdan.Casino.Damages)
Dennis Crouch, Broadening Federal Circuit Jurisprudence: Moving Beyond Federal Circuit Patent Cases, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 19 (2010)
Edward Reines and Nathan Greenblatt, Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009, Part II, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 7  (2010) (Reines.2010)
Gregory P. Landis & Loria B. Yeadon, Selecting the Next Nominee for the Federal Circuit: Patently Obvious to Consider Diversity, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (2010) (Nominee Diversity)
Paul Cole, Patentability of Computer Software As Such, 2008 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1. (Cole.pdf)
John F. Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf)
Mark R. Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38
Arti K. Rai, The GSK Case: An Administrative Perspective, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 36
Joshua D. Sarnoff, BIO v. DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf)
John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 21. (Duffy.BPAI.pdf)
Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)
  New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
marymosley · 4 years
Text
New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion
New PatentlyO Law Journal article by Thomas F. Cotter, Taft Stettinius & Hollister Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Innovators Network Foundation Intellectual Property Fellow.  Professor Cotter is also the author of the Comparative Patent Remedies blog. 
Abstract: On August 11, 2020, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment in favor of the FTC. This essay argues that the Court of Appeals made two significant errors in its analysis. The first relates to the court’s failure to understand how Qualcomm’s conduct in the market for patent licenses affects competition in the complementary market for smartphone chips. The second concerns the court’s statement, at odds with the D.C. Circuit’s landmark decision in Microsoft, that if conduct “is not anticompetitive under § 1, the court need not separately analyze conduct under § 2.”
From the Introduction: 
On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc.[1] The opinion, authored by Judge Consuelo Callahan and joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Stephen Murphy III, reversed the district court’s judgment in favor of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).[2]  Whether the FTC will pursue any further relief, by way of a petition for rehearing en banc or for certiorari, remains (as of this writing) uncertain.  Regardless of whether it does or not, however, it is important to note two fundamental errors in the court’s analysis which, if not corrected or limited by subsequent case law, could lead to serious problems in future litigation.
Read Thomas F. Cotter, Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion, 2020 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2020).
Prior Patently-O Patent L.J. Articles:
Jasper L. Tran & J. Sean Benevento, Alice at Five, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 25 (2019) (Tran.2019.AliceatFive.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Implementing Apportionment, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 20 (Chao.2019.ImplementingApportionment)
Jeremy C. Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas?, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 10. (2019.Doerre.AnyNeed)
Colleen V. Chien, Piloting Applicant-Initiated 101 Deferral Through A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2019 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (2019.Chien.DeferringPSM)
David A. Boundy, Agency Bad Guidance Practices at the Patent and Trademark Office: a Billion Dollar Problem, 2018 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 20. (Boundy.2018.BadGuidance)
Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1.
Paul M. Janicke, Patent Venue: Half Christmas Pie, And Half Crow, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 13. (Janicke.2017.ChristmasPie.pdf)
Paul M. Janicke, The Imminent Outpouring from the Eastern District of Texas, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2017) (Janicke.2017.Venue)
Mark A. Lemley, Erik Oliver, Kent Richardson, James Yoon, & Michael Costa, Patent Purchases and Litigation Outcomes, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 15 (Lemley.2016.PatentMarket)
Bernard Chao and Amy Mapes, An Early Look at Mayo’s Impact on Personalized Medicine, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 10 (Chao.2016.PersonalizedMedicine)
James E. Daily, An Empirical Analysis of Some Proponents and Opponents of Patent Reform, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (Daily.2016.Professors)
Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. CLS Bank in Patent Examination, 2014 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (GrayLeCozDuan)
Robert L. Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf)
Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29.  (Morgan.2011.AIAAmbiguities)
Joshua D. Sarnoff, Derivation and Prior Art Problems with the New Patent Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 12 (sarnoff.2011.derivation.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Not So Confidential: A Call for Restraint in Sealing Court Records, 2011 Patently-O Patent Patent Law Journal 6 (chao.sealedrecords.pdf)
Benjamin Levi and Rodney R. Sweetland, The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Recommendations to the International Trade Commission (ITC):  Unsound, Unmeasured, and Unauthoritative, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (levi.ftcunsound.pdf)
Kevin Emerson Collins, An Initial Comment on King Pharmaceuticals: The Printed Matter Doctrine as a Structural Doctrine and Its Implications for Prometheus Laboratories, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 111 (Collins.KingPharma.pdf)
Robert A. Matthews, Jr., When Multiple Plaintiffs/Relators Sue for the Same Act of Patent False Marking, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 95 (matthews.falsemarking.pdf)
Kristen Osenga, The Patent Office’s Fast Track Will Not Take Us in the Right Direction, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 89 (Osenga.pdf)
Peter S. Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79
Donald S. Chisum, Written Description of the Invention: Ariad (2010) and the Overlooked Invention Priority Principle, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 72
Kevin Collins, An Initial Comment on Ariad: Written Description and the Baseline of Patent Protection for After-Arising Technology, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24
Etan Chatlynne, Investigating Patent Law’s Presumption of Validity—An Empirical Analysis, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 37
Michael Kasdan and Joseph Casino, Federal Courts Closely Scrutinizing and Slashing Patent Damage Awards, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24 (Kasdan.Casino.Damages)
Dennis Crouch, Broadening Federal Circuit Jurisprudence: Moving Beyond Federal Circuit Patent Cases, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 19 (2010)
Edward Reines and Nathan Greenblatt, Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009, Part II, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 7  (2010) (Reines.2010)
Gregory P. Landis & Loria B. Yeadon, Selecting the Next Nominee for the Federal Circuit: Patently Obvious to Consider Diversity, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (2010) (Nominee Diversity)
Paul Cole, Patentability of Computer Software As Such, 2008 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1. (Cole.pdf)
John F. Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf)
Mark R. Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38
Arti K. Rai, The GSK Case: An Administrative Perspective, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 36
Joshua D. Sarnoff, BIO v. DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf)
John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 21. (Duffy.BPAI.pdf)
Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)
  New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes
marymosley · 4 years
Text
New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion
New PatentlyO Law Journal article by Thomas F. Cotter, Taft Stettinius & Hollister Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School, and Innovators Network Foundation Intellectual Property Fellow.  Professor Cotter is also the author of the Comparative Patent Remedies blog. 
Abstract: On August 11, 2020, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment in favor of the FTC. This essay argues that the Court of Appeals made two significant errors in its analysis. The first relates to the court’s failure to understand how Qualcomm’s conduct in the market for patent licenses affects competition in the complementary market for smartphone chips. The second concerns the court’s statement, at odds with the D.C. Circuit’s landmark decision in Microsoft, that if conduct “is not anticompetitive under § 1, the court need not separately analyze conduct under § 2.”
From the Introduction: 
On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc.[1] The opinion, authored by Judge Consuelo Callahan and joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Stephen Murphy III, reversed the district court’s judgment in favor of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).[2]  Whether the FTC will pursue any further relief, by way of a petition for rehearing en banc or for certiorari, remains (as of this writing) uncertain.  Regardless of whether it does or not, however, it is important to note two fundamental errors in the court’s analysis which, if not corrected or limited by subsequent case law, could lead to serious problems in future litigation.
Read Thomas F. Cotter, Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion, 2020 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2020).
Prior Patently-O Patent L.J. Articles:
Jasper L. Tran & J. Sean Benevento, Alice at Five, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 25 (2019) (Tran.2019.AliceatFive.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Implementing Apportionment, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 20 (Chao.2019.ImplementingApportionment)
Jeremy C. Doerre, Is There Any Need to Resort to a § 101 Exception for Prior Art Ideas?, 2019 PatentlyO L.J. 10. (2019.Doerre.AnyNeed)
Colleen V. Chien, Piloting Applicant-Initiated 101 Deferral Through A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2019 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (2019.Chien.DeferringPSM)
David A. Boundy, Agency Bad Guidance Practices at the Patent and Trademark Office: a Billion Dollar Problem, 2018 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 20. (Boundy.2018.BadGuidance)
Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1.
Paul M. Janicke, Patent Venue: Half Christmas Pie, And Half Crow, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 13. (Janicke.2017.ChristmasPie.pdf)
Paul M. Janicke, The Imminent Outpouring from the Eastern District of Texas, 2017 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (2017) (Janicke.2017.Venue)
Mark A. Lemley, Erik Oliver, Kent Richardson, James Yoon, & Michael Costa, Patent Purchases and Litigation Outcomes, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 15 (Lemley.2016.PatentMarket)
Bernard Chao and Amy Mapes, An Early Look at Mayo’s Impact on Personalized Medicine, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 10 (Chao.2016.PersonalizedMedicine)
James E. Daily, An Empirical Analysis of Some Proponents and Opponents of Patent Reform, 2016 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (Daily.2016.Professors)
Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. CLS Bank in Patent Examination, 2014 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1. (GrayLeCozDuan)
Robert L. Stoll, Maintaining Post-Grant Review Estoppel in the America Invents Act: A Call for Legislative Restraint, 2012 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (Stoll.2012.estoppel.pdf)
Paul Morgan, The Ambiguity in Section 102(a)(1) of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 29.  (Morgan.2011.AIAAmbiguities)
Joshua D. Sarnoff, Derivation and Prior Art Problems with the New Patent Act, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 12 (sarnoff.2011.derivation.pdf)
Bernard Chao, Not So Confidential: A Call for Restraint in Sealing Court Records, 2011 Patently-O Patent Patent Law Journal 6 (chao.sealedrecords.pdf)
Benjamin Levi and Rodney R. Sweetland, The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Recommendations to the International Trade Commission (ITC):  Unsound, Unmeasured, and Unauthoritative, 2011 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1 (levi.ftcunsound.pdf)
Kevin Emerson Collins, An Initial Comment on King Pharmaceuticals: The Printed Matter Doctrine as a Structural Doctrine and Its Implications for Prometheus Laboratories, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 111 (Collins.KingPharma.pdf)
Robert A. Matthews, Jr., When Multiple Plaintiffs/Relators Sue for the Same Act of Patent False Marking, 2010 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 95 (matthews.falsemarking.pdf)
Kristen Osenga, The Patent Office’s Fast Track Will Not Take Us in the Right Direction, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 89 (Osenga.pdf)
Peter S. Menell,  The International Trade Commission’s Section 337 Authority, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 79
Donald S. Chisum, Written Description of the Invention: Ariad (2010) and the Overlooked Invention Priority Principle, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 72
Kevin Collins, An Initial Comment on Ariad: Written Description and the Baseline of Patent Protection for After-Arising Technology, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24
Etan Chatlynne, Investigating Patent Law’s Presumption of Validity—An Empirical Analysis, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 37
Michael Kasdan and Joseph Casino, Federal Courts Closely Scrutinizing and Slashing Patent Damage Awards, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24 (Kasdan.Casino.Damages)
Dennis Crouch, Broadening Federal Circuit Jurisprudence: Moving Beyond Federal Circuit Patent Cases, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 19 (2010)
Edward Reines and Nathan Greenblatt, Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009, Part II, 2010 Patently‐O Patent L.J. 7  (2010) (Reines.2010)
Gregory P. Landis & Loria B. Yeadon, Selecting the Next Nominee for the Federal Circuit: Patently Obvious to Consider Diversity, 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (2010) (Nominee Diversity)
Paul Cole, Patentability of Computer Software As Such, 2008 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1. (Cole.pdf)
John F. Duffy, The Death of Google’s Patents, 2008 Patently O-Pat. L.J. ___ (googlepatents101.pdf)
Mark R. Patterson, Reestablishing the Doctrine of Patent Exhaustion, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 38
Arti K. Rai, The GSK Case: An Administrative Perspective, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 36
Joshua D. Sarnoff, BIO v. DC and the New Need to Eliminate Federal Patent Law Preemption of State and Local Price and Product Regulation, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 30 (Download Sarnoff.BIO.pdf)
John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 21. (Duffy.BPAI.pdf)
Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate)
  New PatentlyO Law Journal Essay: Two Errors in the Ninth Circuit’s Qualcomm Opinion published first on https://immigrationlawyerto.tumblr.com/
0 notes