#Is it perhaps difficult to cast for an 'ugly' role without insulting actresses? Also yes!
Text
The utter fury of reading about a character in a Victorian novel who is frankly described as ‘ugly’ and googling them only to find out that absolutely every tv adaptation portrays them as ‘brown haired but otherwise conventionally attractive to the 21st century’
#Are Victorian men very irritating when they choose to describe women based solely on their looks? Yes!#Is it perhaps difficult to cast for an 'ugly' role without insulting actresses? Also yes!#Is it possible that our beauty conventions have changed- I say yes but this particular actress would still have made a Victorian swoon#She has perfectly plucked eyebrows and clear skin too#So it's just going to frustrate me endlessly#Also there were aspects of this character which imo are still controversial in the 21st century#Body hair being one of many things which we still hold against women for god knows what reason#Beauty standards are bullshit and nobody should be treated better just because they're more physically attractive#But the answer to that is not 'Oh let's pretend all women are beautiful by only casting hot actresses so it's obvious these men were insane'#The answer to that is 'cast all sorts of people with all sorts of looks and if you explain to the actress the standards of the time period#I'm pretty sure she's not going to be insulted if you point out that this peanut-brained Victorian man may not have had the hots for her'#You know what's also unattractive? Internalised misogyny. But we can keep that in apparently it's just the body hair that's too much#This will never stop annoying me#It's up there with 'gives 24 year old actress grey highlights to pretend that she's now an old woman'#The Woman in White#reading log
36 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
