Tumgik
#Daenerys Targaryen
lilymarch · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
the woman dies.
542 notes · View notes
bl00dlight · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
When a Targaryen is born, the gods flip a coin. One side a gorgeous woman, the other a fucking criminal.
148 notes · View notes
vodkaletters · 2 days
Text
Yes, Targaryen men are gorgeous. The beauty of a malnourished twink who wasn't sleep well in years but Targaryen women? They're superior in beauty. A powerful woman who can fight, ride a dragon and be kinda psychic? There's no debate in that.
I don't care if you bring your stupid brother-husband with you, let me get to know you better
101 notes · View notes
dragondreamers · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
200 DAYS OF HOUSE TARGARYEN ↳ day 5: daenerys targaryen & viserys iii targaryen in winter is coming
85 notes · View notes
la-pheacienne · 2 days
Text
So let me get this straight.
If I believe that a particular character should be ruler/would be a good ruler/would have been a good ruler/deserves to be ruler/will probably end up being ruler/was unfairly deprived of their rulership, be it dany, or jon, or rhaenyra or rhaegar or arya or bran or stannis the mannis (ew) or my neighbour or your mother or whomever the hell you want them to be, I am classist. And royalist. And conservative. And going against the themes of asoiaf. Because no one can fix westeros, because there are no good rulers/there can be no good rulers/rulership is inherently bad/inherently moraly wrong/ the throne is doomed to be destroyed because it is the root of all evil-
But somehow if you believe that one particular character, coincidentally your fave, will probably be a ruler (queen in the north or in any other position of FEUDAL power- ruling is not just reserved to the iron throne btw), or that she should be a ruler or that she would be a good ruler, you are somehow not classist or royalist or conservative.
Can somebody tell me why that is? What is the justification behind your speculation in the first place? Why will she/why should she be a ruler? Because she deserves it? Because she has been through so much? Because she's strong and powerful and resilient? Okay? So, the only meaningful difference between your take and my take is that I actually (naively!) have faith in the possibility that a character that has been established again and again as a progressive and radical leader could possibly contribute to a meaningful radical collective change in the world while you just consider rulership as a prize, as a reward for individual struggle? And somehow that makes me more conservative? That makes me a classist? Besties, it is literally the other way round.
I don't even hate that character. I am pretty neutral towards her, I would even say that I am sympathetic towards her. And I actually believe she will end up in a position of power (not queen in the north but a position of power nonetheless). Yes, in a position of feudal power, that's what I mean, that's the only real power any character could ever have in a book series that is set in a pseudomedieval world. But you need to be very careful before you start throwing around classism and royalism and conservatism accusations at people for actively engaging with a pseudomedieval fantasy (fantasy!!) book series whose entire foundation is the question "what is a good leader?", "what makes a good leader?", "how does someone become a good leader?", "how could this system become slightly better?", "what are the powers that stop any real progress? how can these powers be defeated?" The answers to these questions in asoiaf are not easy or automatic. But they exist. All of these questions have answers in the text. Concrete, solid answers, whether you like it or not. Believing in the truth of those answers simply means we engage with the themes of the (fictional!) story. It simply makes us fans of the text. It does not make us stupid or naive, and it definitely does not make us conservative.
There is nothing that I despise more in this fandom than the double standard of "oh you are so lame if you actually believe someone could/will be a good ruler, nobody should be king or queen, meanwhile let's talk about my fave's ruling arc" (asoiaf version), or "oh you are so lame if you actually believe a particular character should have been ruler and not the other, that makes you a classist and we're not, all sides are bad because monarchy, meanwhile let's dedicate 99,9% of our posts explaining why one side is wrong. One specific side. Entirely coincidentally, since we do not take sides" (fire and blood version).
The meaningful difference between these two fandom "factions" is that one is honest and openly engages with the themes of the story in an organic and positive and hopeful way, while the other is just this annoying group of college kids repeating the same, holier-than-thou, pseudo-intellectual takes ad infinitum to appear smarter than anyone else while carefully concealing their obvious bias.
69 notes · View notes
theteamgreen · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Daenerys Targaryen is one of my favorite Targaryen characters.
60 notes · View notes
saintdeimos · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
you’re a dragon, be a dragon!
get this ring ~ direct link to Saínt Deimos
78 notes · View notes
100 notes · View notes
baelontargaryen · 17 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Illustrations by Darryl Elliott of Daenerys Targaryen for The Iron Throne Saga by George R. R. Martin
64 notes · View notes
Text
120 notes · View notes
bi-alinaoretsev · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
@pscentral​ event 25: seasons ↳ the seasons of my love
60 notes · View notes
mirabritart · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media
The great thing about drawing is that you can choose to inflict your "Daenerys Targaryen has a mullet" headcanon on other people
42 notes · View notes
Note
I wanted to know why so many people believe in the theory that Aemond is the Stark ancestor
So sorry this took me so long to answer anon!
I would say that it's driven purely out of a hatred for the Greens' ending. GRRM shows how they were in the wrong by wiping out their bloodline, so TG stans want to basically retcon that.
Certain TG stans are very obsessed with the thought of having the moral high ground over the Blacks. GOT chose to establish the Starks as these paragons of virtue and morality, basically having them have the final say on what's moral. So in order to try to put their favs in a morally superior light they want to connect them to the Starks, even though the Starks supported Rhaenyra.
They also want to remove the fact that Rhaenyra's true victory is in her descendants, namely Daenerys. Because TG stans tend to be anti Targaryen and anti Dany (not all of them, but a majority), they really like the show's ending. So they think that having Aemond's bloodline be the Starks, they will have both the moral and literal victory over Rhaenyra.
34 notes · View notes
art-raer · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media
was having fun with textured brushes in clip studio paint
28 notes · View notes
g0oshtt · 15 hours
Text
"aegon is a rapist, I know, but I love him anyway"
This is simply the most disgusting comment I've read today from an anonymous person who commented on a green profile that is blocked because I can block it if I don't want to read nonsense like this.
However, this came to me from another blog here.
And this comment gave me a "fuck Dyana, I really like Aegon" vibe.
Using the excuse that he is a complex character to defend rape is stupid, considering that all the characters are complex.
And it's funny, because even though some TG say that Viserys is a demon for abusing Alicent, none of them ever bring up what Aegon did to a girl of no more than 15 years old.
Please TG who defend rape, find better excuses.
36 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
MY FAVORITE DUOS YIPPEEE!!!
31 notes · View notes