Yeah, exactly. They talk all this talk, but they don’t walk the walk. They mostly spew nonsense and just hope you don’t question them, and when you use their own words against them to literally prove to them that their own logic is flawed, they get mad at you, when yet all you did was point out the fact they’ve contradicted themselves. It’s like “dude, you’re the one who said that. I am literally quoting you. Why are you mad at me? You should be mad at yourself for saying what you said.” I guess they’re just used to people agreeing with them and never challenging their beliefs. Not to mention the American school system isn’t actually teaching people any critical thinking skills; they’re just teaching people what to think. It’s all incredibly messed up.

I was watching a woman interview pro-life marchers, and one of them was holding a sign that said “four of my siblings were aborted. Choose life.”

This marcher said she was raised in a family of pro-abortionists, and the siblings before and after her were aborted because the mother “wasn’t ready” at first, and after she gave birth to the third baby, the mother just “didn’t feel like going through another pregnancy.”

That alone hit me so hard. But the part that hit the hardest was when the pro-lifer said “the reason why I was had is…because I was the more conveniently timed one.”

Why do we have to boil down the lives of children to one’s “convenience”? Why? This poor girl has 4 siblings who have no graves, no dates, nowhere to mourn or place flowers, all because her mother chose to think of herself before her children.

It’s so sad. It’s so so sad.

Having an abortion is not accepting the consequences. It is deliberately trying to get rid of the natural aftermath of sex.

What sounds more like accenting the consequences and taking responsibility of your actions to you: “if I get pregnant from having sex, even though I’m not ready to be a mother, I will go through with it because I understand that sex can lead to a pregnancy, and a child shouldn’t die just because I wasn’t excepting or ready to get pregnant,” OR “I’m going to have sex, and—oh, darn, I’m pregnant. I forgot that enduring in my own desires could lead to this…but I don’t really want to have to deal with the consequences, soooo…I’ll just kill the baby.” One shows you’re aware of the consequences and are accepting to take responsibility for them, and the other shows an attempt to reverse the consequences because you don’t want to take responsibility for your actions.

Also, the study you cited was done by a woman who works for a company that produces abortion pills. That alone shows a bias. Not only that, but abortion clinics have been been shown to hide botched abortions from many many many years, so no matter how much research you do on the mortality rate of abortions, all the evidence is inconclusive because they deliberately hide the information necessary to make conclusive claims. This is why you always look at who’s writing the article or doing the research before trusting what you’re reading.

I don't know how many times we have to say this before people start to listen

You do not get to kill someone just because you think their life isn't worth living

As stated earlier: abortion is absolutely not safer than giving birth. I don’t know who told you that, but they’re lying to you. Babies do have the right to reside in the womb; that’s what the womb was made for, and if you’re having sex, you should be aware and ready for the consequence instead of just trying to reverse the consequence when it happens. By having sex, you are openly inviting in sperm to fertilize your eggs; that’s just a fact, and I’m sorry you have trouble accepting that.

I don't know how many times we have to say this before people start to listen

You do not get to kill someone just because you think their life isn't worth living

If you’re so concerned about “owning” your body, wouldn’t you want to protect your body? Yet you’re advocating for abortions, which are incredibly invasive to women’s bodies, and women literally die due to them. Maybe it would be better to try to prevent getting pregnant, right? Instead of getting an invasive procedure done that’s harmful to you and kills the innocent human being you decided to make by having sex.

You advocate for these awful procedures that hurt women and kill innocent children, yet you turn around and say it’s better to have these procedures done instead of giving birth (which isn’t even close to being as bad as abortions) all because you “own” your body. And if you truly believe people own their bodies, wouldn’t you want the babies to be able to make decisions about their own bodies, too? Instead of the woman deciding for the child on what happens to the child’s body? If you actually cared about people getting to make decisions because they own their bodies, then you’d care just as much about the children, whose bodies are being mutilated from abortions, as you care for the women getting these invasive procedures.

Your argument is a double standard, and what you’re saying is: the woman owns her own body, so she get’s to decide what happens to another person’s body. Does the baby not own their own body??? That would be like saying “I get to decide what happens to this person because they live in my house because I invited them to live here.” Girl, you invited them! You had sex and invited the sperm in! Of course it’s going to live there! You literally invited it in!

I really would like for you to think through your beliefs, and when you find contradictions, take a moment to process those and see what truly makes sense. I’m not trying to be rude; I just want you to see what is a foundational truth and what actually makes the most sense. I want you to come to your own conclusions about what’s right and true instead of just saying stuff you’ve heard other people say.

I don't know how many times we have to say this before people start to listen

You do not get to kill someone just because you think their life isn't worth living

But killing a pre born child (and literally digging their mutilated body out of the woman’s womb) does not violate that child’s bodily autonomy? The child has a body, too, you know. Also, you do know it’s legal in some places to kill a baby right before birth, right? At that point, the baby isn’t at all dependent on the mother’s body, so by your own logic, that type of abortion should be illegal because it violates the baby’s bodily autonomy. The child’s body is their own body, regardless of whether their body is located in or outside of the womb; the reason a baby can live separately from the mother is literally because the baby has their own body.

You’re arguing women can do whatever they want with their body when yet abortion is the mutilation of another human’s body; they aren’t deciding what happens to themselves, they’re deciding what happens to a whole other human being.

I don't know how many times we have to say this before people start to listen

You do not get to kill someone just because you think their life isn't worth living

Well, since you believe morals are relative, and the majority of doctors agree that life begins at conception and it’s wrong to kill a living human being, then you should respect it when doctors don’t provide abortions and the government bans abortions. Since it’s all relative to you, you should be respectful of other people’s “relative” moral standpoints. And if you can’t bring yourself to do that, then that would suggest you don’t ACTUALLY see morals as relative and you don’t ACTUALLY see people’s rights as relative either, since you’d be pushing for people to agree with YOUR moral standpoint…which is exactly what you’re doing now.

Weird you think it’s all relative, but then asserted YOU knew what was weird, and YOU knew what was morally right, and YOU’RE the one coming back and wasting your energy on trying to convince other people that their “relative” moral standpoint is wrong. If it truly is all relative, you shouldn’t care nearly as much as you seem to care right now.

I was watching a woman interview pro-life marchers, and one of them was holding a sign that said “four of my siblings were aborted. Choose life.”

This marcher said she was raised in a family of pro-abortionists, and the siblings before and after her were aborted because the mother “wasn’t ready” at first, and after she gave birth to the third baby, the mother just “didn’t feel like going through another pregnancy.”

That alone hit me so hard. But the part that hit the hardest was when the pro-lifer said “the reason why I was had is…because I was the more conveniently timed one.”

Why do we have to boil down the lives of children to one’s “convenience”? Why? This poor girl has 4 siblings who have no graves, no dates, nowhere to mourn or place flowers, all because her mother chose to think of herself before her children.

It’s so sad. It’s so so sad.

Also, if morals are relative, then you can never be morally outraged. You know…since it’s all relative. And since it’s all relative, why are you even choosing to have this conversation with us? Since we’re apparently allowed to have conflicting views, why are you spending so much time trying to convince us we’re wrong? You just said so yourself—it’s all relative—so this conversation is completely useless according to your point of view, yet you still choose to keep coming back and waste energy on something you see as completely relative. I’m just saying, your actions don’t align with what you’re saying.

I was watching a woman interview pro-life marchers, and one of them was holding a sign that said “four of my siblings were aborted. Choose life.”

This marcher said she was raised in a family of pro-abortionists, and the siblings before and after her were aborted because the mother “wasn’t ready” at first, and after she gave birth to the third baby, the mother just “didn’t feel like going through another pregnancy.”

That alone hit me so hard. But the part that hit the hardest was when the pro-lifer said “the reason why I was had is…because I was the more conveniently timed one.”

Why do we have to boil down the lives of children to one’s “convenience”? Why? This poor girl has 4 siblings who have no graves, no dates, nowhere to mourn or place flowers, all because her mother chose to think of herself before her children.

It’s so sad. It’s so so sad.

I wasn’t talking about me. I was asking YOU.

Who do YOU think gets to tell us what is right? Is it you? Do YOU get to tell everyone what is right? Is that why you insisted that it was “weird” to mourn the death of an unborn child? Because you think you have the right to tell everyone else what is right and what isn’t?

Does the government get to tell us what is right? Do they get to pass and overturn laws because they’re the ones deciding what is right? It would seem so, and because of that, that would make abortion wrong and the intentional killing of unborn babies illegal and not right since Roe v Wade was overturned.

I was watching a woman interview pro-life marchers, and one of them was holding a sign that said “four of my siblings were aborted. Choose life.”

This marcher said she was raised in a family of pro-abortionists, and the siblings before and after her were aborted because the mother “wasn’t ready” at first, and after she gave birth to the third baby, the mother just “didn’t feel like going through another pregnancy.”

That alone hit me so hard. But the part that hit the hardest was when the pro-lifer said “the reason why I was had is…because I was the more conveniently timed one.”

Why do we have to boil down the lives of children to one’s “convenience”? Why? This poor girl has 4 siblings who have no graves, no dates, nowhere to mourn or place flowers, all because her mother chose to think of herself before her children.

It’s so sad. It’s so so sad.

Just out of curiosity, @beccasapunk14, who do you think tells us what’s right? Is it God or the government?

I was watching a woman interview pro-life marchers, and one of them was holding a sign that said “four of my siblings were aborted. Choose life.”

This marcher said she was raised in a family of pro-abortionists, and the siblings before and after her were aborted because the mother “wasn’t ready” at first, and after she gave birth to the third baby, the mother just “didn’t feel like going through another pregnancy.”

That alone hit me so hard. But the part that hit the hardest was when the pro-lifer said “the reason why I was had is…because I was the more conveniently timed one.”

Why do we have to boil down the lives of children to one’s “convenience”? Why? This poor girl has 4 siblings who have no graves, no dates, nowhere to mourn or place flowers, all because her mother chose to think of herself before her children.

It’s so sad. It’s so so sad.

Me sitting on my throne: ugghhhhhh everyone is so dumb and I’m kinda done dealing with them. :/ Executioner!! The whole kingdom. We’re starting over.

I approve this approval of this message

People who eat super spicy peppers are pretty much just bored

I use the word moist as much as I can just to watch the people around me inwardly cringe

if you unscramble the word “seasons” it spells “no asses”

showed this to my non-tumblr friend and her only response was “what the fuck is a salad”

eww why are you having salad

are you five years old

ah yes my 2 favorite web celebs

Hatsune Miku

and

Sperm

Little cousin: what are humans made of?

Me: